Class II versus Class III radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: An observational study in a tertiary center

被引:16
|
作者
Ditto, A. [1 ]
Martinelli, F. [1 ]
Ramondino, S. [1 ]
Vullo, S. L. [2 ]
Carcangiu, M. [3 ]
Haeusler, E. [4 ]
Mariani, L. [2 ]
Lorusso, D. [1 ]
Raspagliesi, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Inst, IRCCS, Dept Gynecol Oncol, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Natl Canc Inst, IRCCS, Unit Clin Epidemiol & Trial Org, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[3] Natl Canc Inst, IRCCS, Dept Pathol, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[4] Natl Canc Inst, IRCCS, Dept Anaesthesiol, I-20133 Milan, Italy
来源
EJSO | 2014年 / 40卷 / 07期
关键词
Cervical cancer; Radical hysterectomy; Tailoring radicality; Overall/disease free survival; Recurrence rate; STAGE; CARCINOMA; PARAMETRECTOMY; INVOLVEMENT; HISTORY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2014.02.229
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aims: The purpose of this observational study was to evaluate disease free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and local recurrence rate (LRR) in patients submitted to Class II RH compared with Class III RH in early FIGO stage cervical cancer (ECC). Materials and methods: We investigated 127 patients with CC admitted to the National Cancer Institute of Milan from June 2001 to October 2011 treated with Class II RH, and compared them with 202 patients operated with Class III RH between March 1980 and March 2001. A total of 329 patients were collected. Results: Median follow-up time was 91 months (IQ range:58-196). Five-year OS and DFS estimates were 89.5% (95%CI: 86.0-93.2%) and 85.6% (95%CI: 81.6-89.7%), respectively. Estimates of effect of surgical treatment (Class III RH versus Class II RH) on OS showed a HR of death = 3.38 (95%CI: 1.18-9.63, P = 0.0228), at univariable Cox analysis, and a HR = 3.08 (95%CI: 0.96-9.93; P = 0.0595) at multivariable analysis. For DFS, a HR of relapse = 2.51 (95%CI 1.10-5.72; P = 0.0290) comparing Class III vs Class II was found at multivariable analysis. Overall recurrence rate was 12.8%, whilst it was 16.3% for Class III and 7.1% for Class II respectively. Conclusions: The present data suggest that the outcomes of Class H RH are comparable in terms of LRR and OS to those of Class III RH, according to literature data. The opportunity of extending the indication to all women with ECC needs further investigations. Clearer data are warranted by prospective controlled studies. (c) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:883 / 890
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CLASS II VERSUS CLASS III RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY IN EARLY CERVICAL CANCER: AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY IN A TERTIARY CENTER
    Ditto, A.
    Martinelli, F.
    Ramondino, S.
    Lo Vullo, S.
    Mariani, L.
    Carcangiu, M.
    Lorusso, D.
    Raspagliesi, F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2013, 23 (08)
  • [2] Class III Nerve-sparing Radical Hysterectomy Versus Standard Class III Radical Hysterectomy: An Observational Study
    Antonino Ditto
    Fabio Martinelli
    Flavia Mattana
    Claudio Reato
    Eugenio Solima
    Marialuisa Carcangiu
    Edward Haeusler
    Luigi Mariani
    Francesco Raspagliesi
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2011, 18 : 3469 - 3478
  • [3] Class III Nerve-sparing Radical Hysterectomy Versus Standard Class III Radical Hysterectomy: An Observational Study
    Ditto, Antonino
    Martinelli, Fabio
    Mattana, Flavia
    Reato, Claudio
    Solima, Eugenio
    Carcangiu, Marialuisa
    Haeusler, Edward
    Mariani, Luigi
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 (12) : 3469 - 3478
  • [4] Class II versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: A prospective randomized study
    Landoni, F
    Maneo, A
    Cormio, G
    Perego, P
    Milani, R
    Caruso, O
    Mangioni, C
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 80 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [5] Class I versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB1-IIA cervical cancer. A prospective randomized study
    Landoni, F.
    Maneo, A.
    Zapardiel, I.
    Zanagnolo, V.
    Mangioni, C.
    [J]. EJSO, 2012, 38 (03): : 203 - 209
  • [6] Class I versus Class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB1 (tumor ≤ 2 cm) cervical cancer: a matched cohort study
    Wang, Wei
    Shang, Chun-liang
    Du, Qi-qiao
    Wu, Di
    Liang, Yan-chun
    Liu, Tian-yu
    Huang, Jia-ming
    Yao, Shu-zhong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 8 (05): : 825 - 831
  • [7] Class III vs class II radical hysterectomy in stage IB cervical carcinoma: A comparison of morbidity and survival
    Fotiou, S
    Tserkezoglou, A
    Hatzieleftheriou, G
    Apostolikas, N
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 1997, 7 (02) : 117 - 121
  • [8] RADICAL VERSUS MODIFIED RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY IN THE TREATMENT OF EARLY CERVICAL CANCER
    Jeon, S.
    Jeon, H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 : 773 - 773
  • [9] Vaginal radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer
    Roy, M
    Plante, M
    Renaud, MC
    Tetu, B
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1996, 62 (03) : 336 - 339
  • [10] Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early cervical cancer
    Kucukmetin, Ali
    Biliatis, Ioannis
    Naik, Raj
    Bryant, Andrew
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (10):