Assessing National Institutes of Health funding and scholarly impact in neurological surgery

被引:51
|
作者
Svider, Peter F. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Husain, Qasim [1 ]
Folbe, Adam J. [4 ]
Couldwell, William T. [5 ]
Liu, James K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Eloy, Jean Anderson [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Neurol Surg, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[2] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[3] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Ctr Skull Base & Pituitary Surg, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Detroit, MI USA
[5] Univ Utah, Dept Neurosurg, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
academic promotion; National Institutes of Health funding; h index; scholarly impact; research productivity; H-INDEX; RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY; GENDER DISPARITIES; ANESTHESIOLOGISTS; ASSOCIATION; PERFORMANCE; PROMOTION; TRENDS; CAREER;
D O I
10.3171/2013.8.JNS13938
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Object. Research productivity is increasingly important in academic neurological surgery and can be measured through a variety of methods, such as publications, objective bibliometrics, and securing external grant support. The authors' objectives were to determine whether there is an association between scholarly impact, as measured by the h index, and successful National Institutes of Health (NTH) grant funding awarded to faculty in neurological surgery departments. Methods. Primary investigators receiving National Institutes of Health (NIH) awards from Fiscal Years 2011 2013 were organized by academic rank, terminal degree, and their h index, as calculated from the Scopus database. These data were also obtained for nonfunded faculty from 15 randomly selected departments for comparison, and the average h index for each group was calculated. Results. National Institutes of Health funded faculty had higher average h indices than their nonfunded colleagues (23.6 vs 10.8, p < 0.0001), a finding that persisted upon controlling for academic rank. The mean h index increased with successive academic rank in both cohorts; greater funding totals were seen with successive academic position (Kruskal-Wallis, p < 0.05). National Institutes of Health funded MDs had higher h indices than their PhD colleagues (p = 0.04), although funding levels did not differ significantly. There was a trend of increasing h index with higher NTH-funding ranges (p < 0.05). Conclusions. The authors' findings demonstrate a strong relationship between scholarly impact and securing NIH funding among faculty in academic neurosurgical departments. Faculty receiving a greater amount of funding tended to have a higher h index. Mean scholarly impact, as measured by the h index, increased with successive academic rank among both NTH-funded and nonfunded faculty, suggesting that this bibliometric may have utility as an adjunct in the academic appointment and promotion process in academic neurological surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 196
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Impact of National Institutes of Health Funding on Scholarly Productivity in Academic Plastic Surgery
    Silvestre, Jason
    Abbatematteo, Joseph M.
    Chang, Benjamin
    Serletti, Joseph M.
    Taylor, Jesse A.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 137 (02) : 690 - 695
  • [2] The Association between Scholarly Impact and National Institutes of Health Funding in Ophthalmology
    Svider, Peter F.
    Lopez, Santiago A.
    Husain, Qasim
    Bhagat, Neelakshi
    Eloy, Jean Anderson
    Langer, Paul D.
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 121 (01) : 423 - 428
  • [3] Cardiothoracic Surgery Research Articles Supported by National Institutes of Health Grant Funding Exhibit Enhanced Scholarly Impact
    Wang, Hanjay
    Bajaj, Simar
    Williams, Kiah M.
    Woo, Y.
    Boyd, Jack
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2021, 144
  • [4] Neurological Surgery at the National Institutes of Health
    Mehta, Gautam U.
    Heiss, John D.
    Park, John K.
    Asthagiri, Ashok R.
    Zaghloul, Kareem A.
    Lonser, Russell R.
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 74 (01) : 49 - 59
  • [5] National Institutes of Health Funding in Plastic Surgery: A Crisis?
    Silvestre, Jason
    Abbatematteo, Joseph M.
    Serletti, Joseph M.
    Chang, Benjamin
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 138 (03) : 732 - 739
  • [6] Association Between Gender, Scholarly Impact, and National Institutes of Health Funding of United States Academic Ophthalmologists
    Answine, Adeline
    Camacci, Mona Lotfipour
    Ikpoh, Belinda
    Lehman, Erik
    Scott, Ingrid U.
    Pantanelli, Seth
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2020, 61 (07)
  • [7] Discussion: National Institutes of Health Funding in Plastic Surgery: A Crisis?
    Brown, David L.
    Cederna, Paul S.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 138 (03) : 740 - 741
  • [8] The Association between Scholarly Impact and Canadian Institutes of Health Research Funding in Psychiatry
    MacMaster, Frank
    Swansburg, Rose
    Rittenbach, Katherine
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 81 (10) : S412 - S412
  • [9] A Scholarly Dialog on Recent Trends in National Institutes of Health's Funding for the Thyroid Field
    Hidalgo-Alvarez, Jorge
    Bianco, Antonio C.
    [J]. THYROID, 2024, 34 (08) : 962 - 968
  • [10] The impact of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery on National Institutes of Health grant funding for cardiothoracic surgeons
    Mehaffey, J. Hunter
    Wang, Hanjay
    Narahari, Adishesh K.
    Bajaj, Simar S.
    Chandrabhatla, Anirudha S.
    Krupnick, Alexander S.
    Sellke, Frank W.
    Rosengart, Todd K.
    Woo, Y. Joseph
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 165 (05): : 1885 - +