Randomized open-labbel non-inferiority trial of acetaminophen or loxoprofen for patients with acute low back pain

被引:17
|
作者
Miki, Kenji [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Ikemoto, Tatsunori [3 ,6 ]
Hayashi, Kazuhiro [3 ,6 ]
Arai, Young-Chang [3 ,6 ]
Sekiguchi, Miho [4 ,6 ]
Shi, Kenrin [5 ,6 ]
Ushida, Takahiro [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Pain Med, Suita, Osaka, Japan
[2] Hayaishi Hosp, Ctr Pain Management, Osaka, Japan
[3] Aichi Med Univ, Multidisciplinary Pain Ctr, 1-1 Yazakokarimata, Nagakute, Aichi 4801195, Japan
[4] Fukushima Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Fukushima, Japan
[5] Tenjin Orthopaed & Rheumatol, Osaka, Japan
[6] Japanese Assoc Study Musculoskeletal Pain, Clin Res Grp, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
NONSTEROIDAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; PRESCRIPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jos.2018.02.007
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Current worldwide clinical practice guidelines recommend acetaminophen as the first option for the treatment of acute low back pain. However, there is no concrete evidence regarding whether acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is more effective for treating acute low back pain (LBP) in Japan. The present study aimed to investigate whether acetaminophen treatment for acute musculoskeletal pain was comparable with loxoprofen (a traditional NSAID in Japan) treatment. Methods: Of the 140 patients with acute LBP who visited out-patient hospitals, 127 were considered eligible and were randomly allocated to a group taking acetaminophen or one taking loxoprofen. As primary outcome measure, pain intensity was measured using a 0-10-numeric rating scale (NRS). Moreover, pain disability, pain catastrophizing, anxiety, depression, and quality of life, as well as adverse events, were assessed as secondary outcomes. The primary outcome was tested with a noninferiority margin (0.84 on changes in pain-NRS), and the secondary outcomes were compared using conventional statistical methods at week 2 and week 4. Results: Seventy patients completed the study (acetaminophen: 35, loxoprofen: 35). The dropout rates showed no significant difference between the two medication-groups. We found that the mean differences of changes in pain-NRS from baseline to week 2 or 4 between the two medication groups were not statistically beyond the noninferiority margin (mean [95% confidence interval]: -0.51 [-1.70, 0.67], at week 2 and -0.80 [-2.08, 0.48] at week 4). There were no consistent differences between the two medication groups in terms of secondary outcomes. Conclusions: The results suggest that acetaminophen has comparable analgesic effects on acute LBP, based on at least a noninferiority margin, compared with loxoprofen at 4 weeks. Acetaminophen seems to be a reasonable first-line option for patients with acute LBP in Japan. Copyright (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Japanese Orthopaedic Association.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 487
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized open-labbel non-inferiority trial of acetaminophen or loxoprofen for patients with acute low back pain (vol 23, pg 483, 2018)
    Miki, Kenji
    Ikemoto, Tatsunori
    Hayashi, Kazuhiro
    Arai, Young-Chang
    Sekiguchi, Miho
    Shi, Kenrin
    Ushida, Takahiro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2019, 24 (01) : 192 - 192
  • [2] Comment on Miki et al.: Randomized open-label non-inferiority trial of acetaminophen or loxoprofen for patients with acute low back pain
    Toda, Katsuhiro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2019, 24 (01) : 189 - 189
  • [3] Comment on Miki et al.: Randomized open-label non-inferiority trial of acetaminophen or loxoprofen for patients with acute low back pain Reply
    Miki, Kenji
    Ikemoto, Tatsunori
    Hayashi, Kazuhiro
    Arai, Young-Chang
    Sekiguchi, Miho
    Shi, Kenrin
    Ushida, Takahiro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2019, 24 (01) : 190 - 191
  • [4] Efficacy and safety of loxoprofen hydrogel patch versus loxoprofen tablet in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
    Mu, Rong
    Bao, Chun-de
    Chen, Zhi-wei
    Zheng, Yi
    Wang, Guo-chun
    Zhao, Dong-bao
    Hu, Shao-xian
    Li, Yu-jun
    Shao, Zeng-wu
    Zhang, Zhi-yi
    Xiao, Wei-guo
    Zhang, Weiya
    Li, Zhan-guo
    [J]. CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 35 (01) : 165 - 173
  • [5] Efficacy and safety of loxoprofen hydrogel patch versus loxoprofen tablet in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
    Rong Mu
    Chun-de Bao
    Zhi-wei Chen
    Yi Zheng
    Guo-chun Wang
    Dong-bao Zhao
    Shao-xian Hu
    Yu-jun Li
    Zeng-wu Shao
    Zhi-yi Zhang
    Wei-guo Xiao
    Weiya Zhang
    Zhan-guo Li
    [J]. Clinical Rheumatology, 2016, 35 : 165 - 173
  • [6] Qigong versus exercise therapy for chronic low back pain in adults - A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
    Bloedt, S.
    Pach, D.
    Kaster, T.
    Luedtke, R.
    Icke, K.
    Reisshauer, A.
    Witt, C. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2015, 19 (01) : 123 - 131
  • [7] A New Transmucous-Buccal Formulation of Acetaminophen for Acute Traumatic Pain: A Non-inferiority, Randomized, Double-Blind, Clinical Trial
    Pickering, Gisele
    Moustafa, Fares
    Macian, Nicolas
    Schmidt, Jeannot
    Pereira, Bruno
    Dubray, Claude
    [J]. PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2015, 18 (03) : 249 - 257
  • [8] Classical Massage and Acupuncture in Chronic Back Pain - Non-Inferiority Randomised Trial
    Klassen, Erika
    Wiebelitz, Karl-Ruediger
    Beer, Andre-Michael
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND UNFALLCHIRURGIE, 2019, 157 (03): : 263 - 269
  • [9] GROUP VERSUS INDIVIDUAL ACUPUNCTURE (AP) FOR CANCER PAIN: A RANDOMIZED NON-INFERIORITY TRIAL
    Carlson, Linda E.
    Reed, Erica N.
    Landmann, Jessa
    Oberoi, Devesh
    Piedalue, Katherine-Ann L.
    Faris, Peter D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2020, 54 : S496 - S496
  • [10] Outpatients versus inpatients treatment for patients with acute pulmonary embolism: an international, open-label, randomized, non-inferiority trial.
    Chleir, F.
    [J]. PHLEBOLOGIE-ANNALES VASCULAIRES, 2011, 64 (03): : 50 - 51