The good, the bad and the technology: Endogeneity in environmental production models

被引:23
|
作者
Kumbhakar, Subal C. [1 ]
Tsionas, Efthymios G. [2 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Binghamton, Dept Econ, POB 6000, Binghamton, NY 13902 USA
[2] Univ Lancaster, Dept Econ, Sch Management, Bailrigg LA1 4YX, England
关键词
By-production; Endogeneity; MCMC; Technical and environmental efficiency; UNDESIRABLE OUTPUTS; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.06.008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper we consider an environmental production process in which firms intend to produce outputs (which we label as desirable/good) but the production process is such that it automatically produces some other unintentional but inevitable undesirable (bad) outputs as by-products (emission of pollutants), Like stochastic production frontier, by-production technology specifies that there is a minimal amount of the by-product that is produced, given the quantities of inputs and desirable outputs. The presence of (environmental) inefficiency in by-production therefore means that more than this minimal amount of the undesirable output is produced. Similarly, the presence of technical inefficiency implies that, given inputs, less than the maximal possible amount of desirable outputs is produced. Alternatively, it means that more than the minimal amounts of inputs are used to produce a given level of desirable output. We use the "by production technology" approach which is a composition of production technology of desirable outputs and the technology of by-products, and estimate both technical and environmental efficiency. Given that electricity, the good output in our application, is demand determined, we treat it as exogenous and address the endogeneity of inputs by using the first-order conditions of cost minimization. Some of our models automatically take endogeneity of bad outputs into account. We use an efficient Bayesian MCMC technique to estimate both good and bad output technologies and both types of inefficiency. We also compare results with some alternative models with and without endogeneity corrections. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 327
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Medical technology for good or bad
    Didriksen, Julie
    [J]. TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LAEGEFORENING, 2021, 141 (05) : 488 - 488
  • [2] TECHNOLOGY - GOOD OR BAD - AND FOR WHOM
    KELLY, M
    [J]. COMPUTER, 1982, 15 (03) : 8 - 8
  • [3] Medical technology: the good and the bad
    Collier, Roger
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2014, 186 (18) : 1353 - 1353
  • [5] FIGHT BAD POLITICS WITH GOOD TECHNOLOGY
    VERVALIN, CH
    [J]. HYDROCARBON PROCESSING, 1994, 73 (11): : 15 - 15
  • [6] TECHNOLOGY, A GOOD THING OR A BAD THING
    NIKLASSON, R
    [J]. KEMISK TIDSKRIFT, 1988, 100 (05): : 5 - 5
  • [7] Models of osteoarthritis: the good, the bad and the promising
    Cope, P. J.
    Ourradi, K.
    Li, Y.
    Sharif, M.
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2019, 27 (02) : 230 - 239
  • [8] Models and applications of nonparametric environmental production technology: A survey
    Zhou, Peng
    An, Chao
    Sun, Jie
    Wen, Wen
    [J]. Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2020, 40 (08): : 2065 - 2075
  • [9] Environmental disease - Ozone: Good, bad, or indifferent?
    Weinhold, Bob
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2006, 114 (09) : A522 - A522
  • [10] Environmental compliance: The good, the bad, and the super green
    Wu, JunJie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (11) : 3363 - 3381