Evaluation of farming systems according to valuation indices developed within a European network on integrated and ecological arable farming systems

被引:39
|
作者
Helander, CA
Delin, K
机构
[1] Rural Econ & Agr Soc Skaraborg, SE-53222 Skara, Sweden
[2] SLU, Dept Ecol & Crop Prod Sci, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
crop rotation; cropping system; nitrogen; organic farming; phosphorous; sustainable farming;
D O I
10.1016/S1161-0301(03)00089-3
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The aim of this fanning systems' project was to design, layout, evaluate, improve and disseminate results from two approaches to sustainable farming systems, namely those of "ecological" and "integrated" farming. As a reference, a conventional system was used as well. The farming systems were set up and studied at a farm-size scale; the total area for the experiment covered 60 ha of arable land, each field being between 2.5 and 4.0 ha. Our main emphasis was on development of farming systems; the design did not give priority to direct comparisons between different systems. For the evaluation of farming systems, multi-objective and dynamic parameters, such as a Soil Cover Index (SCI), Nitrogen Available Reserves (NAR), a Pesticide Index (PI), Energy Efficiency (EE), Phosphorus Available Reserves (PAR) and Net Surplus (NS) were used. The evaluation of the different farming systems showed that the ecological system surpassed the desired level for Net Surplus by a wide margin and also just reached the desired level for the Soil Cover Index, but failed to reach the desired level for Energy Efficiency and Nitrogen Available Reserves. The integrated system reached desired levels for Nitrogen Available Reserves and Energy Efficiency in 3 out of 4 years, and on average it reached the desired level for the Soil Cover Index and Net Surplus for the 4 years. The integrated system did not on average reach the desired level for the Pesticide Index. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 67
页数:15
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [2] Towards a method for the economic evaluation of environmental indicators for UK integrated arable farming systems
    Bailey, AP
    Rehman, T
    Park, J
    Keatinge, JDH
    Tranter, RB
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 72 (02) : 145 - 158
  • [3] BALANCE OF NITROGEN AND MAGNESIUM IN INTEGRATED AND ECOLOGICAL FARMING SYSTEMS
    Kajanovicova, L.
    Lozek, O.
    [J]. MENDELNET 2010, 2010, : 67 - 72
  • [5] A comparison of energy use in conventional and integrated arable farming systems in the UK
    Bailey, AP
    Basford, WD
    Penlington, N
    Park, JR
    Keatinge, JDH
    Rehman, T
    Tranter, RB
    Yates, CM
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 97 (1-3) : 241 - 253
  • [6] Integrated farming systems: the third way for European agriculture?
    Morris, C
    Winter, M
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 1999, 16 (04) : 193 - 205
  • [7] ARABLE ACRONYMS ANALYZED - A REVIEW OF INTEGRATED ARABLE FARMING SYSTEMS RESEARCH IN WESTERN-EUROPE
    HOLLAND, JM
    FRAMPTON, GK
    CILGI, T
    WRATTEN, SD
    [J]. ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 1994, 125 (02) : 399 - 438
  • [8] Experimental evaluation of Visual-Inertial Odometry systems for arable farming
    Cremona, Javier
    Comelli, Roman
    Pire, Taihu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FIELD ROBOTICS, 2022, 39 (07) : 1123 - 1137
  • [9] Seed bank depletion of wild oat and cleavers in integrated arable farming systems
    Watson, SJ
    Murdoch, A
    Park, JR
    [J]. 1999 BRIGHTON CONFERENCE: WEEDS, VOLS 1-3, 1999, : 569 - 570
  • [10] Evaluation of the sustainability of contrasted pig farming systems: integrated evaluation
    Bonneau, M.
    Klauke, T. N.
    Gonzalez, J.
    Rydhmer, L.
    Ilari-Antoine, E.
    Dourmad, J. Y.
    de Greef, K.
    Houwers, H. W. J.
    Cinar, M. U.
    Fabrega, E.
    Zimmer, C.
    Hviid, M.
    van der Oever, B.
    Edwards, S. A.
    [J]. ANIMAL, 2014, 8 (12) : 2058 - 2068