Breast reconstruction and risk of arm lymphedema development: A meta-analysis

被引:28
|
作者
Siotos, Charalampos [1 ]
Sebai, Mohamad E. [2 ]
Wan, Eric L. [1 ]
Bello, Ricardo J. [1 ]
Habibi, Mehran [2 ]
Cooney, Damon S. [1 ]
Manahan, Michele A. [1 ]
Cooney, Carisa M. [1 ]
Seal, Stella M. [3 ]
Rosson, Gedge D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 601 N Caroline St, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, 4940 Eastern Ave, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Welch Med Lib, 1900 E Monument St, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
Breast cancer; Breast reconstruction; Lymphedema; Upper-extremity lymphedema; Meta-analysis; CANCER-RELATED LYMPHEDEMA; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; POSTMASTECTOMY LYMPHEDEMA; PROSPECTIVE-COHORT; MASTECTOMY; SURVIVORS; TISSUE; DIAGNOSIS; SEVERITY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2018.01.012
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Lymphedema remains a significant complication following breast cancer surgery when there is axillary lymph node intervention. Previous systematic reviews have identified risk factors for breast cancer-related lymphedema, including increased BMI, number of lymph nodes dissected and radiotherapy. However, they have not examined the effect of breast reconstruction on lymphedema occurrence. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we sought to evaluate the association between breast reconstruction (BR) and lymphedema. Methods: We searched PubMed (1966-2016), Embase (1966-2016), Scopus (2004-2016) and Google Scholar (2004-2016) for studies involving breast reconstruction and upper-extremity lymphedema or breast cancer-related lymphedema. Our primary outcome was lymphedema occurrence. We performed a meta-analysis using random effects due to heterogeneity of the studies. Results: Our search strategy identified 934 articles. After screening, 19 studies were included in our meta-analysis evaluating outcomes based on number of patients (7501) or number of breasts surgically treated (2063). Breast reconstruction was significantly associated with lower odds of lymphedema (p < 0.001) compared to mastectomy only or breast-conserving surgery. Lymphedema rates were not statistically significantly different between patients undergoing implant-based or autologous BR. Conclusions: Breast reconstruction is associated with lower rates of lymphedema compared to mastectomy only or breast conserving surgery patients. Although the study does not prove causation, we hypothesize that this association is likely due to multiple factors, including a self-selecting population and mechanisms through which BR may contribute to primary or secondary prevention of lymphedema. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify this beneficial relationship between breast reconstruction and reduced lymphedema risk. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:807 / 818
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk Factors of Arm Lymphedema Following Breast Reconstruction - An Updated Meta-Analysis
    Alghamdi, Abdulrahman
    Al Qurashi, Abdullah
    Alghamdi, Faisal
    Alfaqeeh, Khaled
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2023, 11 (3S) : 21 - 21
  • [2] The Risk of Developing Arm Lymphedema Among Breast Cancer Survivors: A Meta-Analysis of Treatment Factors
    Rebecca J. Tsai
    Leslie K. Dennis
    Charles F. Lynch
    Linda G. Snetselaar
    Gideon K. D. Zamba
    Carol Scott-Conner
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2009, 16 : 1959 - 1972
  • [3] The Risk of Developing Arm Lymphedema Among Breast Cancer Survivors: A Meta-Analysis of Treatment Factors
    Tsai, Rebecca J.
    Dennis, Leslie K.
    Lynch, Charles F.
    Snetselaar, Linda G.
    Zamba, Gideon K. D.
    Scott-Conner, Carol
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (07) : 1959 - 1972
  • [4] Prospective Surveillance for Breast Cancer-Related Arm Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Rafn, Bolette S.
    Christensen, Jan
    Larsen, Anders
    Bloomquist, Kira
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (09) : 1009 - +
  • [5] Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction for Prevention of Secondary Lymphedema: A Meta-Analysis
    Chun, Magnus J.
    Saeg, Fouad
    Meade, Anna
    Kumar, Taruni
    Toraih, Eman A.
    Chaffin, Abigail E.
    Homsy, Christopher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2022, 75 (03): : 1130 - 1141
  • [6] Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis
    Barry, M.
    Kell, M. R.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2011, 127 (01) : 15 - 22
  • [7] Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis
    M Barry
    M. R. Kell
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2011, 127 : 15 - 22
  • [8] Risk prediction models for breast cancer-related lymphedema: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shen, Aomei
    Wei, Xiaoxia
    Zhu, Fei
    Sun, Mengying
    Ke, Sangsang
    Qiang, Wanmin
    Lu, Qian
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2023, 64
  • [9] A meta-analysis to determine the risk of breast cancer treatment combinations on the incidence of breast cancer-related lymphedema
    Swarup, Arushri
    Vella, Alain
    Frattolin, Jennifer
    Kalamaras, Ilias
    Drosou, Anastasios
    Makri, Elpiniki
    Moore, James, Jr.
    Thiruchelvam, Paul
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (SUPPL 1) : 178 - 179
  • [10] Use of the Cephalic Vein in DIEP Breast Reconstruction Does Not Increase Risk of Lymphedema of the Ipsilateral Arm
    Svee, Andreas
    Falk-Delgado, Alberto
    Folkvaljon, Folke
    Cederland, Christoffer
    Wallenius, Imke
    Audolfsson, Thorir
    Drazan, Lubos
    Mani, Maria
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 151 (01) : 195 - 201