The validity and reliability of the English version of the diabetes distress scale for type 2 diabetes patients in Malaysia

被引:15
|
作者
Chin, Ying Woei [1 ]
Lai, Pauline Siew Mei [1 ]
Chia, Yook Chin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Med, Primary Care Res Grp, Dept Primary Care Med, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[2] Sunway Univ, Sunway lnst Healthcare Dev, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia
来源
BMC FAMILY PRACTICE | 2017年 / 18卷
关键词
Diabetes Distress Scale; DDS-17; Validity; Reliability; Malaysia; Type; 2; diabetes; English; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; EMOTIONAL DISTRESS; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; PROBLEM AREAS; DEPRESSION; STRESS; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION; MANAGEMENT; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-017-0601-9
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Several disease specific instruments have been developed to identify and assess diabetes distress. In Malaysia, the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale has been validated in Malay, but it does not have specific domains to assess the different areas of diabetes-related distress. Hence, we decided to use the Diabetes Distress Scale instead. To date, only the Malay version of the Diabetes Distress Scale has been validated in Malaysia. However, English is widely spoken by Malaysians, and is an important second language in Malaysia. Therefore, our aim was to determine the validity and reliability of the English version of the Diabetes Distress Scale among patients with type 2 diabetes in Malaysia. Methods: The Diabetes Distress Scale was administered to 114 patients with type 2 diabetes, who could understand English, at baseline and 4 weeks later, at a primary care clinic in Malaysia. To assess for convergent validity, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale was administered at baseline. Discriminative validity was assessed by analysing the total diabetes distress scores of participants with poor (Hb(A1c) > 7.0%) and good glycaemic control (Hb(A1c) <= 7.0%). Results: The majority of our participants were male 65(57.0%), with a median duration of diabetes of 9.5 years. Exploratory factor analysis showed that the Diabetes Distress Scale had 4 subscales, as per the original Diabetes Distress Scale. The overall Cronbach's a was 0.920 (range = 0.784-0.859 for each subscale). The intraclass correlation ranged from 0.436 to 0. 643 for test-retest. The Diabetes Distress Scale subscales were significantly correlated with the different subscales of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (spearman's rho range = 0.427-0.509, p < 0.001). Patients with poor glycaemic control had significantly higher diabetes distress score (1.88) compared to those with good glycaemic control (1.50) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The English version of the Diabetes Distress Scale was found to be a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate diabetes distress among patients with type 2 diabetes in Malaysia. It can be used in clinical practice to offer a useful indicator of the effect of diabetes-induced distress during clinic visits, especially for patients with poor glycemic control. This would ensure that these patients are provided the care that is required.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The validity and reliability of the English version of the diabetes distress scale for type 2 diabetes patients in Malaysia
    Ying Woei Chin
    Pauline Siew Mei Lai
    Yook Chin Chia
    [J]. BMC Family Practice, 18
  • [2] The Validity and Reliability of Japanese Version of the Diabetes Distress Scale for Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
    Matsumoto, Hirohide
    Okazaki, Kentaro
    Oya, Toshiki
    Takahashi, Noriyuki
    Suematsu, Mina
    [J]. DIABETES, 2018, 67
  • [3] Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Diabetes Distress Scale for type 2 diabetes and distress levels of the participants
    Telci Caklili, Ozge
    Alkaya Feyizoglu, Gunes
    Tulu, Selcan
    Dizman, Nazli
    Bozkurt, Irem Sidika
    Oguz, Aytekin
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 50 (02) : 464 - 470
  • [4] The reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Appraisal of Diabetes Scale for type 2 diabetes patients
    Hara, Yoriko
    Koyama, Satoshi
    Morinaga, Toru
    Ito, Hisao
    Kohno, Shusuke
    Hirai, Hiroyuki
    Kikuchi, Toshio
    Tsuda, Toru
    Ichino, Isao
    Takei, Satoko
    Yamada, Kentaro
    Tsuboi, Koji
    Breugelmans, Raoul
    Ishihara, Yoko
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2011, 91 (01) : 40 - 46
  • [5] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of diabetes distress screening scale
    Li, M.
    Mo, Y.
    Ji, L.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2012, 55 : S401 - S402
  • [6] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Self-Stigma Scale in patients with type 2 diabetes
    Kato, Asuka
    Takada, Misato
    Hashimoto, Hideki
    [J]. HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2014, 12
  • [7] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Self-Stigma Scale in patients with type 2 diabetes
    Asuka Kato
    Misato Takada
    Hideki Hashimoto
    [J]. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12
  • [8] Assessing the reliability and validity of the Slovenian version of the Appraisal of Diabetes Scale (ADS-S) in type 2 diabetes patients
    Mihevc, Matic
    Mirosevic, Spela
    Lukancic, Majda Mori
    Potocnik, Tina Virtic
    Zavrnik, Crt
    Ster, Marija Petek
    Klemenc-Ketis, Zalika
    Susic, Antonija Poplas
    Stiglic, Gregor
    Stiglic, Gregor
    Stiglic, Gregor
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (03): : 1 - 12
  • [9] Psychometric Performance of the Brazilian Version of the Diabetes Distress Scale in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
    Apolinario, Priscila Peruzzo
    Trevisan, Danilo Donizetti
    Matheus Rodrigues, Roberta Cunha
    Jannuzzi, Fernanda Freire
    Ferreira, Julia Fazzio
    de Oliveira, Henrique Ceretta
    Araujo, Eliana Pereira
    de Melo Lima, Maria Helena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING MEASUREMENT, 2016, 24 (02) : E101 - E113
  • [10] Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the diabetes knowledge test among in-patients with type 2 diabetes
    Minami, Taichi
    Shirakawa, Jun
    Hiiragi, Hiroko
    Yamada, Taku
    Suzuki, Youichi
    Shirabe, Shinitiro
    Maeda, Hajime
    Terauchi, Yasuo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION, 2022, 13 (03) : 580 - 587