Differences in gene expression of granulosa cells from women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with either recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone or highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin

被引:83
|
作者
Grondahl, Marie Louise [1 ]
Borup, Rehannah [3 ]
Lee, Young Bae [2 ]
Myrhoj, Vibeke [2 ]
Meinertz, Helle [1 ]
Sorensen, Steen [2 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Hvidovre Hosp, Fertil Clin, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Hvidovre Hosp, Dept Biochem, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
[3] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Microarrayctr, Rigshosp, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
关键词
Granulosa; human; recombinant FSH; hMG; LH receptor; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; ASSISTED REPRODUCTION TREATMENT; MESSENGER-RIBONUCLEIC-ACID; RNA-BINDING-PROTEIN; LUTEINIZING-HORMONE; DOWN-REGULATION; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAYS; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CORPUS-LUTEUM; FSH;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.137
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the differences in the gene expression profile of granulosa cells from preovulatory follicles after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) or urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) FSH. Design: Prospective randomized study. Setting: University-based facilities for clinical services and research. Patient(S): Thirty women undergoing treatment with vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). Intervention(s): Patients were randomly allocated to receive recombinant FSH or human (hMG) COH. Granulosa cells were collected from follicular fluid after oocyte retrieval, and mRNA were isolated for gene expression analysis. Main Outcome Measure(s): General gene expression profile. Result(S): Ninety-six probe sets (85 genes) showed statistically significant differences in expression level in the two groups of granulosa cells. Expression level of luteinizing hormone/human chorionic gonadotropin (LH/hCG) receptor gene and genes involved in biosynthesis of cholesterol and steroids were expressed at lower levels in the hMG-treated cells; inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate-3-kinase-A and S100-calcium-binding-protein-P (anti-apoptosis protein) were expressed at higher levels in hMG than in recombinant FSH. Conclusion(S): The different hormone compositions of the two drugs used for COH had a statistically significant impact on the gene expression profile of preovulatory granulosa cells. Some of these genes may be important for periovulatory events, which suggests that the preparation used for COH is important for granulosa cell function and may influence the developmental competence of the oocyte and the function of corpus luteum. (Fertil Steril(R) 2009;91:1820-30. (C) 2009 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:1820 / 1830
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Human menopausal gonadotropin and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in assisted reproductive cycles
    van Wely, M
    Westergaard, LG
    Bossuyt, PMM
    van der Veen, F
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 80 (05) : 1121 - 1122
  • [2] Gene expression profiles of cumulus cells obtained from women treated with recombinant human luteinizing hormone plus recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone or highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin versus recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone alone
    Gatta, Valentina
    Tatone, Carla
    Ciriminna, Rosanna
    Vento, Marilena
    Franchi, Sara
    d'Aurora, Marco
    Sperduti, Samantha
    Cela, Vito
    Borzi, Placido
    Palermo, Roberto
    Stuppia, Liborio
    Artini, Paolo Giovanni
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 99 (07) : 2000 - +
  • [3] Comparison of controlled ovarian stimulation with human menopausal gonadotropin or recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone
    Filicori, M
    Cognigni, GE
    Pocognoli, P
    Tabarelli, C
    Ferlini, F
    Perri, T
    Parmegiani, L
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 80 (02) : 390 - 397
  • [4] Follicular recruitment is reduced in minimal stimulation for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation using purified human menopausal gonadotropin compared with follicle-stimulating hormone
    Park, John K.
    Clark, Rachel
    Session, Donna R.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 91 (04) : 1434 - 1436
  • [5] Effectiveness of human menopausal gonadotropin versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in assisted reproductive cycles: a meta-analysis
    van Wely, M
    Westergaard, LG
    Bossuyt, PMM
    van der Veen, F
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 80 (05) : 1086 - 1093
  • [6] Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone versus human menopausal gonadotropin in the late follicular phase during ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization
    Commenges-Ducos, M
    Piault, S
    Papaxanthos, A
    Ribes, C
    Dallay, D
    Commenges, D
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 78 (05) : 1049 - 1054
  • [7] Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection After Follicle Stimulation with Highly Purified Human Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Compared with Human Menopausal Gonadotropin
    Ariel Weissman
    James Meriano
    Susan Ward
    Lynda Gotlieb
    Robert F. Casper
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 1999, 16 : 63 - 68
  • [8] Intracytoplasmic sperm injection after follicle stimulation with highly purified human follicle-stimulating hormone compared with human menopausal gonadotropin
    Weissman, A
    Meriano, J
    Ward, S
    Gotlieb, L
    Casper, RF
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 1999, 16 (02) : 63 - 68
  • [9] FOLLICLE-STIMULATING HORMONE RECEPTOR GENE POLYMORPHISM AND OVARIAN RESPONSES TO CONTROLLED OVARIAN HYPERSTIMULATION
    Trevisan, C. M.
    Cordts, E. B.
    Barbosa, C. P.
    Bianco, B.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2012, 98 (03) : S104 - S104
  • [10] Endometrial HOXA10 expression after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone
    Taylor, HS
    Daftary, GS
    Selam, B
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 80 : 839 - 843