Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle

被引:51
|
作者
Chen, L. [1 ,2 ]
Schenkel, F. [2 ]
Vinsky, M. [3 ]
Crews, D. H., Jr. [4 ]
Li, C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Agr Food & Nutr Sci, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada
[2] Univ Guelph, Dept Anim & Poultry Sci, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[3] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Lacombe Res Ctr, Lacombe, AB T4L 1W1, Canada
[4] Colorado State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
across breed genomic prediction; beef cattle; Illumina Bovine SNP50 Beadchip; residual feed intake; within breed genomic prediction; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; SELECTION; PERFORMANCE; EFFICIENCY; IMPACT; MAPS;
D O I
10.2527/jas.2013-5715
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
In beef cattle, phenotypic data that are difficult and/or costly to measure, such as feed efficiency, and DNA marker genotypes are usually available on a small number of animals of different breeds or populations. To achieve a maximal accuracy of genomic prediction using the phenotype and genotype data, strategies for forming a training population to predict genomic breeding values (GEBV) of the selection candidates need to be evaluated. In this study, we examined the accuracy of predicting GEBV for residual feed intake (RFI) based on 522 Angus and 395 Charolais steers genotyped on SNP with the Illumina Bovine SNP50 Beadchip for 3 training population forming strategies: within breed, across breed, and by pooling data from the 2 breeds (i.e., combined). Two other scenarios with the training and validation data split by birth year and by sire family within a breed were also investigated to assess the impact of genetic relationships on the accuracy of genomic prediction. Three statistical methods including the best linear unbiased prediction with the relationship matrix defined based on the pedigree (PBLUP), based on the SNP genotypes (GBLUP), and a Bayesian method (BayesB) were used to predict the GEBV. The results showed that the accuracy of the GEBV prediction was the highest when the prediction was within breed and when the validation population had greater genetic relationships with the training population, with a maximum of 0.58 for Angus and 0.64 for Charolais. The within-breed prediction accuracies dropped to 0.29 and 0.38, respectively, when the validation populations had a minimal pedigree link with the training population. When the training population of a different breed was used to predict the GEBV of the validation population, that is, across-breed genomic prediction, the accuracies were further reduced to 0.10 to 0.22, depending on the prediction method used. Pooling data from the 2 breeds to form the training population resulted in accuracies increased to 0.31 and 0.43, respectively, for the Angus and Charolais validation populations. The results suggested that the genetic relationship of selection candidates with the training population has a greater impact on the accuracy of GEBV using the Illumina Bovine SNP50 Beadchip. Pooling data from different breeds to form the training population will improve the accuracy of across breed genomic prediction for RFI in beef cattle.
引用
收藏
页码:4669 / 4678
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for carcass merit traits in Angus and Charolais beef cattle
    Chen, L.
    Vinsky, M.
    Li, C.
    [J]. ANIMAL GENETICS, 2015, 46 (01) : 55 - 59
  • [2] Accuracy of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in crossbred beef cattle
    Mujibi, F. D. N.
    Nkrumah, J. D.
    Durunna, O. N.
    Stothard, P.
    Mah, J.
    Wang, Z.
    Basarab, J.
    Plastow, G.
    Crews, D. H., Jr.
    Moore, S. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2011, 89 (11) : 3353 - 3361
  • [3] Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population
    Khansefid, M.
    Pryce, J. E.
    Bolormaa, S.
    Miller, S. P.
    Wang, Z.
    Li, C.
    Goddard, M. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2014, 92 (08) : 3270 - 3283
  • [4] Residual feed intake of Angus beef cattle divergently selected for feed conversion ratio
    Smith, S. N.
    Davis, M. E.
    Loerch, S. C.
    [J]. LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2010, 132 (1-3) : 41 - 47
  • [5] Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle
    Bolormaa, S.
    Pryce, J. E.
    Kemper, K.
    Savin, K.
    Hayes, B. J.
    Barendse, W.
    Zhang, Y.
    Reich, C. M.
    Mason, B. A.
    Bunch, R. J.
    Harrison, B. E.
    Reverter, A.
    Herd, R. M.
    Tier, B.
    Graser, H. -U.
    Goddard, M. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (07) : 3088 - 3104
  • [6] Expression of candidate genes for residual feed intake in Angus cattle
    Al-Husseini, W.
    Gondro, C.
    Quinn, K.
    Herd, R. M.
    Gibson, J. P.
    Chen, Y.
    [J]. ANIMAL GENETICS, 2014, 45 (01) : 12 - 19
  • [7] Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multibreed beef cattle populations derived from deregressed breeding values and phenotypes
    Weber, K. L.
    Thallman, R. M.
    Keele, J. W.
    Snelling, W. M.
    Bennett, G. L.
    Smith, T. P. L.
    McDaneld, T. G.
    Allan, M. F.
    Van Eenennaam, A. L.
    Kuehn, L. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2012, 90 (12) : 4177 - 4190
  • [8] Divergent breeding values for fatness or residual feed intake in Angus cattle. 5. Cow genotype affects feed efficiency and maternal productivity
    Hebart, M. L.
    Accioly, J. M.
    Copping, K. J.
    Deland, M. P. B.
    Herd, R. M.
    Jones, F. M.
    Laurence, M.
    Lee, S. J.
    Lines, D. S.
    Speijers, E. J.
    Walmsley, B. J.
    Pitchford, W. S.
    [J]. ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2018, 58 (01) : 80 - 93
  • [9] Genomic heritabilities and genomic estimated breeding values for methane traits in Angus cattle
    Hayes, B. J.
    Donoghue, K. A.
    Reich, C. M.
    Mason, B. A.
    Bird-Gardiner, T.
    Herd, R. M.
    Arthur, P. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 (03) : 902 - 908
  • [10] Molecular basis for residual feed intake in beef cattle
    Moore, S. S.
    Mujibi, F. D.
    Sherman, E. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2009, 87 (14) : E41 - E47