How does literacy break mirror invariance in the visual system?

被引:27
|
作者
Pegado, Felipe [1 ]
Nakamura, Kimihiro [2 ]
Hannagan, Thomas [3 ]
机构
[1] KU Leuven Univ, Dept Psychol & Educ Sci, Lab Biol Psychol, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Human Brain Res Ctr, Kyoto, Japan
[3] Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Lab Psychol Cognit, Federat Rech 3C, Marseille, France
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2014年 / 5卷
关键词
multisensory; multi-system; reading; writing; literacy; alphabetization; mirror invariance; mirror discrimination; DEVELOPMENTAL DYSLEXIA; CORTICAL NETWORKS; LANGUAGE NETWORK; CHILDREN; VISION; SPEECH; BRAIN; RECOGNITION; AWARENESS; STIMULI;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00703
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A growing literature has been showing a profound impact of alphabetization at several levels of the visual system, including the primary visual cortex (Szwed et al., 2014) and higher-order ventral and dorsal visual areas (Carreiras et al., 2009; Dehaene et al., 2010). Importantly, in typical alphabetization courses, learning to read is not isolated but instead combined with both learning to write and learning to segment the spoken language, relating all these different representations to each other. Indeed, learning to write and to pronounce the elementary sounds of language promotes additional mapping between the visual and motor systems by linking visual representations of letters and motor plans for handwriting and speech production. Thus, besides the already recognized influence of the phonological system, the potential influence from other neural systems in the functioning of the visual system seems to be relatively neglected. In this opinion paper we highlight the importance of multi-systems interplay during literacy acquisition, focusing on the question of how literacy breaks mirror invariance in the visual system. Specifically, we argue for a large contribution of top-down inputs from phonological, handwriting and articulatory representations toward the ventral visual cortex during the development of the visual word form system, which then plays a pivotal role in mirror discrimination of letters in literate individuals. © 2014 Pegado, Nakamura and Hannagan.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Braille readers break mirror invariance for both visual Braille and Latin letters
    de Heering, Adelaide
    Kolinsky, Regine
    COGNITION, 2019, 189 : 55 - 59
  • [2] Literacy Breaks Mirror Invariance for Visual Stimuli: A Behavioral Study With Adult Illiterates
    Pegado, Felipe
    Nakamura, Kimihiro
    Braga, Lucia W.
    Ventura, Paulo
    Nunes Filho, Gilberto
    Pallier, Christophe
    Jobert, Antoinette
    Morais, Jose
    Cohen, Laurent
    Kolinsky, Regine
    Dehaene, Stanislas
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2014, 143 (02) : 887 - 894
  • [3] How to Break the Configuration of Moving Objects? Geometric Invariance in Visual Working Memory
    Sun, Zhongqiang
    Huang, Yuan
    Yu, Wenjun
    Zhang, Meng
    Shui, Rende
    Gao, Tao
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2015, 41 (05) : 1247 - 1259
  • [4] Blind readers break mirror invariance as sighted do
    de Heering, Adelaide
    Collignon, Olivier
    Kolinsky, Regine
    CORTEX, 2018, 101 : 154 - 162
  • [5] How does bone break?
    David Taylor
    Nature Materials, 2003, 2 (3) : 133 - 134
  • [6] How Does Rock Break?
    Bond, Fred C.
    SCIENTIFIC MONTHLY, 1955, 81 : 196 - 198
  • [7] Visual System: How Does Blindsight Arise?
    Cowey, Alan
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (17) : R702 - R704
  • [8] Mirror-invariance is not exclusively visual but extends to touch
    Maksymilian Korczyk
    Katarzyna Rączy
    Marcin Szwed
    Scientific Reports, 14 (1)
  • [9] How does the mirror neuron system change during development?
    Kilner, James M.
    Blakemore, Sarah-Jayne
    DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2007, 10 (05) : 524 - 526
  • [10] Where, and how, does a nanowire break?
    Wang, Dongxu
    Zhao, Jianwei
    Hu, Shi
    Yin, Xing
    Liang, Shuai
    Liu, Yunhong
    Deng, Shengyuan
    NANO LETTERS, 2007, 7 (05) : 1208 - 1212