A low-carbon transport infrastructure in Taiwan based on the implementation of energy-saving measures

被引:29
|
作者
Lu, Shyi-Min [1 ]
机构
[1] Ind Technol Res Inst, Energy & Environm Labs, 195,Sect 4,Chung Hsing Rd, Hsinchu 310, Taiwan
来源
关键词
Land transport; Taiwan; Energy intensity; Energy-saving strategy; LONG-RANGE TRANSPORT; EMISSIONS; ETHANOL; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.242
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Transport is the lifeblood of a nation's economy. Because fossil fuels are being gradually depleted and global warming phenomena are becoming more and more serious, the aim of this article is to study a low-carbon transport infrastructure based on existing energy efficiency indices and green transport policy formulated by Taiwanese Department of Transportation. First, via data collection and analysis, we observed that small passenger cars and large trucks are the largest energy users in the transport sector due to their high energy intensities and large transport volumes. Therefore, the energy-conserving potentials of these vehicles are the focus of this study. According to 'Top-Down" methodology, the most effective and economical energy-saving strategies for Taiwan's transport sector are the significant adoption of rail transport and electrification mode. With a maximum energy-saving scenario, including the adoption of Best Available Technologies (BAT) and the comprehensive expansion of public transport infrastructure, the energy savings potential in the land transport sector of Taiwan is 2931 million liters of oil equivalent (MLOEs). This savings is equivalent to a greenhouse gas emissions reduction of approximately 5.91 Mt CO2e with a scale of 16.73% or crediting 2.40% reduction in national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Finally, we suggest that the green transport infrastructure of Taiwan should primarily include railway, mass rapid transit (MRT), and hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs). (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 509
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Review of Low-Carbon and Energy-Saving Renovation of Existing Buildings
    Yu, Haitao
    Man, Qingpeng
    Feng, Kailun
    [J]. CARBON PEAK AND NEUTRALITY STRATEGIES OF THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY (ICCREM 2022), 2022, : 1 - 8
  • [2] Energy-Saving and Low-Carbon Gear Blank Dimension Design Based on Business Compass
    Xiao, Yongmao
    Zhou, Jincheng
    Wang, Ruping
    Zhu, Xiaoyong
    Zhang, Hao
    [J]. PROCESSES, 2022, 10 (09)
  • [3] New-type of Low-carbon and Energy-saving Toilets Based on Wind Energy and Hydropower Technologies
    Li, Hongjie
    Tao, Xueheng
    Li, Baoying
    [J]. 2011 ASIA-PACIFIC POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APPEEC), 2011,
  • [4] BIM-Based Multi-Objective Optimization of Low-Carbon and Energy-Saving Buildings
    Zhao, Liang
    Zhang, Wei
    Wang, Wenshun
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (20)
  • [5] Measures for Energy Saving and Emission Reduction of Low-Carbon Building Based on Life Cycle
    Ge, Meng
    Li, Xiaodong
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2011, : 385 - 389
  • [6] Tianjin City's Low-Carbon Energy-Saving Building Usage Analysis
    Lu, Jinfeng
    Li, Tingting
    [J]. ICCREM 2015: ENVIRONMENT AND THE SUSTAINABLE BUILDING, 2015, : 532 - 537
  • [7] ENERGY-SAVING MEASURES
    不详
    [J]. ENERGY WORLD, 1977, (42): : 9 - 12
  • [8] Energy-saving potential analysis and assessment on land transport of Taiwan
    Lu, Shyi-Min
    [J]. CASE STUDIES ON TRANSPORT POLICY, 2015, 3 (04) : 468 - 476
  • [9] An energy-saving segment analysis and low-carbon development process model of telecom operators
    Yang, Tian-Jian
    Shu, Hua-Ying
    Hu, Yi-Wen
    Xu, Ning-Ning
    [J]. Beijing Youdian Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2011, 34 (06): : 82 - 85
  • [10] Study on Low-carbon and Energy-saving New Rural Countryside Construction in the Northeast of China
    Xu, Daming
    Zhao, Tianyu
    Cheng, Wen
    [J]. GREEN BUILDING MATERIALS AND ENERGY-SAVING CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 280 : 179 - 182