Research on electric vehicle charging scheduling algorithms based on a 'fractional knapsack'

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Zhenzhou [1 ]
Li, Xinyuan [1 ]
Yu, Pingping [1 ]
Cao, Ning [2 ]
Higgs, Russell [3 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Informat Sci & Engn, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] Wuxi Inst Technol, Sch Internet Things, Wuxi, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Math & Stat, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
fractional knapsack; electric vehicle; charging scheduling; peak-valley load difference; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1504/IJES.2021.111972
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The large-scale disorderly charging of electric vehicles creates challenges for the security of power systems, especially power distribution systems. To avoid peak power consumption during the day and improve the utilisation rate of the power grid at night, a charging scheduling algorithm for electric vehicles based on a 'fractional knapsack' is proposed. Considering the constraints of the user's charging demand and charging system capacity, a charging model based on a fractional knapsack is established to optimise the peak-valley load difference and reduce load fluctuation and charging cost, which is the objective function. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm, the Monte Carlo method is used to simulate the charging demand of electric vehicles, and the disorderly charging and orderly charging scheduling are simulated and compared under a time-sharing tariff mode. The results show that the proposed scheduling algorithm improves the peak-valley difference of the power grid, reduces fluctuation in the power grid load, and improves the utilisation rate of the power grid.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 44
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Research progress of electric vehicle charging scheduling algorithms based on deep reinforcement learning
    Zhang, Yanyu
    Rao, Xinpeng
    Zhou, Shukui
    Zhou, Yi
    [J]. Dianli Xitong Baohu yu Kongzhi/Power System Protection and Control, 2022, 50 (16): : 179 - 187
  • [2] Approximation Scheduling Algorithms for Electric Vehicle Charging with Discrete Charging Options
    Khonji, Majid
    Chau, Sid Chi-Kin
    Elbassioni, Khaled
    [J]. E-ENERGY'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2018, : 579 - 585
  • [3] Research on Electric Vehicle Charging Scheduling Strategy Based on the Multiobjective Algorithm
    Jiang, Xuefeng
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [4] Competitive Algorithms for the Online Multiple Knapsack Problem with Application to Electric Vehicle Charging
    Sun, Bo
    Zeynali, Ali
    Li, Tongxin
    Hajiesmaili, Mohammad
    Wierman, Adam
    Tsang, Danny H. K.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM ON MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2020, 4 (03)
  • [5] Electric vehicle charging scheduling with mobile charging stations
    Li, Hua
    Son, Dongmin
    Jeong, Bongju
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 434
  • [6] Scheduling Mobile Charging Stations for Electric Vehicle Charging
    Chauhan, Vishal
    Gupta, Arobinda
    [J]. 2018 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS AND MOBILE COMPUTING, NETWORKING AND COMMUNICATIONS (WIMOB 2018), 2018, : 131 - 136
  • [7] Leveraging Knapsack QAOA Approach for Optimal Electric Vehicle Charging
    Kea, Kimleang
    Huot, Chansreynich
    Han, Youngsun
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 109964 - 109973
  • [8] Research on the charging load of an electric vehicle based on autoencoder
    Sheng, Rui
    Tang, Zhong
    Shi, Chenhao
    Xue, Jiacheng
    Xie, Linyu
    [J]. Dianli Xitong Baohu yu Kongzhi/Power System Protection and Control, 2021, 49 (02): : 149 - 159
  • [9] A Genetic Algorithm for Scheduling Electric Vehicle Charging
    Garcia-Alvarez, Jorge
    Gonzalez, Miguel A.
    Vela, Camino R.
    [J]. GECCO'15: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, 2015, : 393 - 400
  • [10] Online scheduling and pricing for electric vehicle charging
    Nejad, Mark M.
    Mashayekhy, Lena
    Chinnam, Ratna Babu
    Grosu, Daniel
    [J]. IISE TRANSACTIONS, 2017, 49 (02) : 178 - 193