AN EXPERIMENTAL EXAMINATION OF FISHERIES WITH CONCURRENT COMMON POOL AND INDIVIDUAL QUOTA MANAGEMENT

被引:3
|
作者
Anderson, Christopher M. [1 ]
Uchida, Hirotsugu [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Aquat & Fishery Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Rhode Isl, Dept Environm & Nat Resource Econ, Kingston Coastal Inst 205, Kingston, RI 02881 USA
关键词
RESOURCE;
D O I
10.1111/ecin.12057
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
An emerging trend in fisheries management allows different groups of harvesters pursuing the same stock, even under the same management plan, to manage their effort using different rules, so long as each group remains within its "catch share" portion of mortality. Thus harvesters in a single fishery, with a single total allowable catch, concurrently must respond strategically to the behavior not only of those being managed as they are but also of those facing incentives of different management. In a novel quasi-continuous time experimental environment with a contemporaneous price externality, we explore the effort timing behavior of harvesters managed under common pool (CP) management with that of subjects managed with individual quotas (IQ). Consistent with Nash equilibrium, CP-managed subjects race-to-fish, exerting high levels of effort to secure landings but selling at correspondingly low prices. IQ-managed subjects in the same fishery hold effort back until the CP fishery closes, and use their quota over the balance of the season at a lower weekly landings level, receiving higher prices. After experiencing both management systems, subjects choose to be in a group with IQ by a 3:1 margin. (JEL Q22, Q28, C73)
引用
收藏
页码:900 / 913
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE COMMON FISHERIES POLICY AND UK QUOTA MANAGEMENT
    SYMES, D
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 1992, 18 (2-4) : 319 - 338
  • [2] A CRITICAL-REVIEW OF THE INDIVIDUAL QUOTA AS A DEVICE IN FISHERIES MANAGEMENT
    COPES, P
    [J]. LAND ECONOMICS, 1986, 62 (03) : 278 - 291
  • [3] Resource Rent in Individual Quota Fisheries
    Asche, Frank
    Bjorndal, Trond
    Gordon, Daniel V.
    [J]. LAND ECONOMICS, 2009, 85 (02) : 279 - 291
  • [4] Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives?
    Melnychuk, Michael C.
    Essington, Timothy E.
    Branch, Trevor A.
    Heppell, Selina S.
    Jensen, Olaf P.
    Link, Jason S.
    Martell, Steven J. D.
    Parma, Ana M.
    Smith, Anthony D. M.
    [J]. FISH AND FISHERIES, 2016, 17 (01) : 126 - 142
  • [5] Are input controls required in individual transferable quota fisheries to address ecosystem based fisheries management objectives?
    Emery, Timothy J.
    Green, Bridget S.
    Gardner, Caleb
    Tisdell, John
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2012, 36 (01) : 122 - 131
  • [6] QUOTA HOPPING - THE COMMON FISHERIES POLICY WRONGFOOTED
    CHURCHILL, RR
    [J]. COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW, 1990, 27 (02): : 209 - 247
  • [7] Producers' organizations and devolved fisheries management in the United Kingdom: collective and individual quota systems
    Hatcher, AC
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 1997, 21 (06) : 519 - 533
  • [8] Application of total allowable catch and individual transferable quota approaches to Chinese Fisheries management
    Tang, JY
    Huang, SL
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD WORLD FISHERIES CONGRESS: FEEDING THE WORLD WITH FISH IN THE NEXT MILLENIUM-THE BALANCE BETWEEN PRODUCTION AND ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 38 : 539 - 543
  • [9] Developments on fisheries management in Peru: The new individual vessel quota system for the anchoveta fishery
    Aranda, Martin
    [J]. FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2009, 96 (2-3) : 308 - 312
  • [10] Evaluation of quota management policies for developing fisheries
    Walters, C
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 1998, 55 (12) : 2691 - 2705