Fetal growth regulation and intrauterine growth retardation

被引:0
|
作者
Carrascosa, A [1 ]
Yeste, D [1 ]
Copil, A [1 ]
Audí, L [1 ]
Gusinyé, M [1 ]
Vicens-Calvet, E [1 ]
Clemente, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Childrens Hosp Vall Hebron, E-08035 Barcelona, Spain
关键词
fetal growth; fetal anthropometric parameters; small for gestational age (SGA); intrauterine growth retardation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Gestational age and neonatal anthropometric parameters are currently used to evaluate fetal growth and are predictive factors of perinatal and postnatal morbidity and mortality. We performed a retrospective analysis of neonatal anthropometric parameters (weight, vertex-heel length and head circumference) in 1,470 live preterm neonates born between 1997 and 2002 and a prospective analysis of the same parameters in 1,786 live newborns of both sexes born in 2001 and 2002, products of single 37-42 week uncomplicated pregnancies in healthy Spanish Caucasian mothers. A progressive increase in these parameters with gestational age and sexual dimorphism were observed from the 30(th) week of gestational age onwards, with statistically-significant differences (p < 0.05) at 38-42 weeks of gestational age. An increase in weight and length values in relation to previous Spanish studies was also documented in preterm newborns. It is estimated that 10-15% of children born small for gestational age (SGA) do not experience catch-up growth by the age of 3 years and may have short stature in adulthood. Preliminary data of a cross-sectional study on spontaneous growth in boys and girls born SGA without postnatal catch-up growth show that their +2 SD values of height are similar to -2 SD values of our normal control population of children born with adequate weight and length for gestational age (AGE). However, weight +2 SD values are similar to mean values of control children born AGE. In summary, our data show sexual dimorphism in neonatal anthropometric growth parameters and that these parameters change with time and may he updated. In addition children born SGA without postnatal catch-up are shorter and have higher weight than age-, height- and sex-matched controls born AGE.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 443
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Endocrine regulation in asymmetric intrauterine fetal growth retardation
    Mahajan, S. D.
    Aalinkeel, R.
    Singh, S.
    Shah, P.
    Gupta, N.
    Kochupillai, N.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2006, 19 (10): : 615 - 623
  • [2] Intrauterine growth retardation - The role of insulin-like growth factors in the regulation of fetal growth
    Axt, R
    Jensen, A
    Schmidt, W
    Berger, R
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 1998, 58 (10) : 529 - 542
  • [3] PROGNOSIS OF INTRAUTERINE FETAL GROWTH RETARDATION
    SCHILLINGER, H
    BOEKER, B
    WEBER, S
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 1976, 36 (10) : 827 - 835
  • [4] Intrauterine growth retardation and fetal cardiac function
    Severi, FM
    Rizzo, G
    Bocchi, C
    D'Antona, D
    Verzuri, MS
    Arduini, D
    FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2000, 15 (01) : 8 - 19
  • [5] FETAL MOVEMENTS AND INTRAUTERINE GROWTH-RETARDATION
    MORYOSEF, S
    SADOVSKY, E
    BRZEZINSKI, A
    LEVINSKY, R
    OHEL, G
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1983, 21 (04) : 315 - 318
  • [6] Fetal renal hyperechogenicity in intrauterine growth retardation
    Avni, F
    PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2002, 17 (03) : 222 - 222
  • [7] Uteroplacental hemostasis in intrauterine fetal growth retardation
    Sheppard, BL
    Bonnar, J
    SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 1999, 25 (05): : 443 - 446
  • [8] Fetal renal hyperechogenicity in intrauterine growth retardation
    F. Avni
    Pediatric Nephrology, 2002, 17 : 222 - 222
  • [9] A FETAL GROWTH CURVE FOR THE APPROPRIATE DIAGNOSIS OF INTRAUTERINE GROWTH-RETARDATION
    JUEZ, G
    REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 1989, 117 (11) : 1311 - 1311
  • [10] INTRAUTERINE GROWTH IN TWIN PREGNANCIES - PREDICTION OF FETAL GROWTH-RETARDATION
    SECHER, NJ
    KAERN, J
    HANSEN, PK
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1985, 66 (01): : 63 - 68