Integration of ecosystem-based models into an existing interactive web-based tool for improved aquaculture decision-making

被引:25
|
作者
Bricker, Suzanne B. [1 ]
Getchis, Tessa L. [2 ]
Chadwick, Cary B. [3 ]
Rose, Corim. [4 ]
Rose, Julie M. [5 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, Natl Ctr Coastal Sci, Silver Spring, MD 20910 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, UConn Extens, Connecticut Sea Grant, Groton, CT USA
[3] Univ Connecticut, Ctr Land Use Educ & Res, Haddam, CT USA
[4] US Army, Corps Engnineers, Concord, MA USA
[5] NOAA, Fisheries Northeast Fisheries Sci Ctr Milford Lab, Milford, CT USA
关键词
Shellfish; Aquaculture; GIS; Decision support tool; SHELLFISH AQUACULTURE; CARRYING-CAPACITY; MANAGEMENT; CULTURE; SITES; GIS; INDICATORS; ESTUARY; SOUND;
D O I
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.11.036
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Proper site selection is critical to the development and expansion of marine aquaculture. Major considerations for site selection include: potential for competing uses, environmental interactions, and animal productivity. Two types of existing site selection tools, mapping and modeling, have proven useful independently, and in some recent studies have proven useful when used together. GIS-based mapping tools have become important in the decision-making process. These tools provide access to marine and coastal datasets allowing farmers and extension agents to gather information on availability of cultivation sites. They are also used by resource managers to assess potential use conflicts (e.g. existence of commercial fishing, mooring areas, fixed fishing gear) and possible environmental interactions (e.g. presence of seagrasses, contaminants, threatened or endangered species). Models have been used separately to predict animal growth, farm productivity, and farm-related effects on the surrounding water and sediment quality. The integration of the Farm Aquaculture Resource Management (FARM) model (http://www.farmscale.org) into the U.S. state of Connecticut's Aquaculture Mapping Atlas (http://seagrant.uconn.edu/whatwedo/aquaculture/shellmap.php) was tested in three geographically distinct waterbodies within Connecticut (CT) waters of Long Island Sound. Nearshore waters within the towns of Mystic, Milford, and Westport were selected as pilot locations to determine usability and capability of the combined tools. Data from two long-term offshore sampling stations adjacent to existing shellfish leases were used to test spatial and temporal sampling variability impacts on model results. Partnerships with local monitoring programs and growers were important for acquisition of water quality data, oyster measurement data, and information about local culture practices. All sites were deemed suitable for oyster aquaculture based on model results that predicted Moderate to High growth based on estimated time to reach harvest size from one in (2.54 cm) seed oysters (Crassostrea virginica). Time to harvest varied from 282 days (High growth) to 645 days (Moderate growth) among the 22 stations in the three nearshore sites, and 724-956 days (Moderate growth) at the two offshore sites. Results from the two long-term offshore stations indicate that data from the same year must be used when comparing production-based suitability of sites. Addition of potential production estimates improved the ability to select between suitable mapping-based sites. This mapping and modeling combination should be encouraged to provide a strong basis for successful siting and expansion of aquaculture while minimizing user conflict and adverse environmental interactions. This approach may be particularly useful in waterbodies where shellfish aquaculture is possible but is not well established. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 146
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Structuring decision-making for ecosystem-based management
    Espinosa-Romero, Maria J.
    Chan, Kai M. A.
    McDaniels, Timothy
    Dalmer, Denise M.
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2011, 35 (05) : 575 - 583
  • [2] Teaching surgical decision-making: An interactive, web-based approach
    Servais, Elliot L.
    LaMorte, Wayne W.
    Agarwal, Suresh
    Moschetti, Wayne
    Mallipattu, Sandeep K.
    Moulton, Steven L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2006, 134 (01) : 102 - 106
  • [3] A web-based collaborative decision-making tool for life cycle interpretation
    Karacapilidis, Nikos I.
    Pappis, Costas P.
    Tsoulfas, Giannis T.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING FOR SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING BUSINESSES, 2007, : 41 - +
  • [4] Value-Based Decision-Making Using a Web-Based Tool: A Multiple Case Study
    Freitas, Vitor
    Perkusich, Mirko
    Mendes, Emilia
    Rodriguez, Pilar
    Oivo, Markku
    [J]. 2017 24TH ASIA-PACIFIC SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APSEC 2017), 2017, : 279 - 288
  • [5] Development of decision-making indicators for ecosystem-based river basin management
    Nakamura, T
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2006, 20 (06) : 1293 - 1308
  • [6] Integrating Stakeholders' Perceptions into Decision-Making for Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management
    Jones, Kristin
    Seara, Tarsila
    [J]. COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 48 (04) : 275 - 288
  • [7] A web-based tool for operational decision making and IWRM
    Buitrago, S.
    Franken, T.
    Leyssen, G.
    Osorio, S.
    Smets, S.
    Restrepo, D.
    Triana, H.
    Chaparro, A.
    [J]. 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HYDROINFORMATICS (HIC 2016) - SMART WATER FOR THE FUTURE, 2016, 154 : 42 - 48
  • [8] Web 2.0 integration in a WEB-based Decision Support System : Effect study of social networking on decision-making
    Bessedik, Imene
    Taghezout, Noria
    Saidi, Amina
    [J]. 2012 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY (INTECH), 2012, : 365 - 370
  • [9] Measuring Decision-Making During Thyroidectomy: Validity Evidence for a Web-Based Assessment Tool
    Madani, Amin
    Gornitsky, Jordan
    Watanabe, Yusuke
    Benay, Cassandre
    Altieri, Maria S.
    Pucher, Philip H.
    Tabah, Roger
    Mitmaker, Elliot J.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 42 (02) : 376 - 383
  • [10] Measuring Decision-Making During Thyroidectomy: Validity Evidence for a Web-Based Assessment Tool
    Amin Madani
    Jordan Gornitsky
    Yusuke Watanabe
    Cassandre Benay
    Maria S. Altieri
    Philip H. Pucher
    Roger Tabah
    Elliot J. Mitmaker
    [J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2018, 42 : 376 - 383