Vaginal birth after cesarean: neonatal outcomes and United States birth setting

被引:31
|
作者
Tilden, Ellen L. [1 ]
Cheyney, Melissa [5 ]
Guise, Jeanne-Marie [2 ]
Emeis, Cathy [1 ]
Lapidus, Jodi [3 ,4 ]
Biel, Frances M. [2 ]
Wiedrick, Jack [3 ]
Snowden, Jonathan M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Sch Nursing, Dept Nurse Midwifery, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Biostat & Design Program, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[4] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Oregon Clin & Translat Res Inst, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[5] Oregon State Univ, Dept Anthropol, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
birth center; birth setting; cesarean; home birth; labor after cesarean; neonatal outcome; vaginal birth after cesarean; VBAC; OF-HOSPITAL BIRTHS; DELIVERY; HOME; TRENDS; LABOR; VBAC; RISK; AVAILABILITY; MORBIDITY; MIDWIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.001
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Women who seek vaginal birth after cesarean delivery may find limited in-hospital options. Increasing numbers of women in the United States are delivering by vaginal birth after cesarean delivery out-of-hospital. Little is known about neonatal outcomes among those who deliver by vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in-vs out-of-hospital. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare neonatal outcomes between women who deliver via vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in-hospital vs out-of-hospital (home and freestanding birth center). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using 2007e2010 linked United States birth and death records to compare singleton, term, vertex, nonanomolous, and liveborn neonates who delivered by vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in-or out-of-hospital. Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to estimate unadjusted, absolute, and relative birth-setting risk differences. Analyses were stratified by parity and history of vaginal birth. Sensitivity analyses that involved 3 transfer status scenarios were conducted. RESULTS: Of women in the United States with a history of cesarean delivery (n = 1,138,813), only a small proportion delivered by vaginal birth after cesarean delivery with the subsequent pregnancy (n = 109,970; 9.65%). The proportion of home vaginal birth after cesarean delivery births increased from 1.78-2.45%. A pattern of increased neonatal morbidity was noted in unadjusted analysis (neonatal seizures, Apgar score <7 or <4, neonatal seizures), with higher morbidity noted in the out-of-hospital setting (neonatal seizures, 23 [0.02%] vs 6 [0.19%; P<.001]; Apgar score <7, 2859 [2.68%] vs 139 [4.42%; P<.001; Apgar score <4, 431 [0.4%] vs 23 [0.73; P = .01]). A similar, but nonsignificant, pattern of increased risk was observed for neonatal death and ventilator support among those neonates who were born in the out-of-hospital setting. Multivariate regression estimated that neonates who were born in an out-of-hospital setting had higher odds of poor outcomes (neonatal seizures [adjusted odds ratio, 8.53; 95% confidence interval, 2.87-25.4); Apgar score < 7 [adjusted odds ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-1.96]; Apgar score < 4 [adjusted odds ratio, 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-2.79]). Although the odds of neonatal death (adjusted odds ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-6.05; P =.18) and ventilator support (adjusted odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-2.46) appeared to be increased in out-of-hospital settings, findings did not reach statistical significance. Women birthing their second child by vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in out-of-hospital settings had higher odds of neonatal morbidity and death compared with women of higher parity. Women who had not birthed vaginally prior to out-of-hospital vaginal birth after cesarean delivery had higher odds of neonatal morbidity and mortality compared with women who had birthed vaginally prior to out-of-hospital vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Sensitivity analyses generated distributions of plausible alternative estimates by outcome. CONCLUSION: Fewer than 1 in 10 women in the United States with a previous cesarean delivery delivered by vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in any setting, and increasing proportions of these women delivered in an out-of-hospital setting. Adverse outcomes were more frequent for neonates who were born in an out-of-hospital setting, with risk concentrated among women birthing their second child and women without a history of vaginal birth. This information urgently signals the need to increase availability of in-hospital vaginal birth after cesarean delivery and suggests that there may be benefit associated with increasing options that support physiologic birth and may prevent primary cesarean delivery safely. Results may inform evidence-based recommendations for birthplace among women who seek vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:403.e1 / 403.e8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: Characteristics and Outcomes by US Birth Setting
    Tilden, Ellen
    Cheyney, Melissa
    Guise, Jeanne-Marie
    Emeis, Cathy
    Biel, Frances
    Snowden, Jonathan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2016, 25 (09) : 973 - 973
  • [2] A description of the management and outcomes of vaginal birth after cesarean birth in the homebirth setting
    Latendresse, G
    Murphy, PA
    Fullerton, JT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2005, 50 (05) : 386 - 391
  • [3] Vaginal Birth After Cesarean New Insights on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes
    Guise, Jeanne-Marie
    Denman, Mary Anna
    Emeis, Cathy
    Marshall, Nicole
    Walker, Miranda
    Fu, Rongwei
    Janik, Rosalind
    Nygren, Peggy
    Eden, Karen B.
    McDonagh, Marian
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 115 (06): : 1267 - 1278
  • [4] Neonatal Mortality Risk for Repeat Cesarean Compared to Vaginal Birth after Cesarean (VBAC) Deliveries in the United States, 1998–2002 Birth Cohorts
    Fay Menacker
    Marian F. MacDorman
    Eugene Declercq
    [J]. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2010, 14 : 147 - 154
  • [5] Trends and Patterns of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Availability in the United States
    Gregory, Kimberly D.
    Fridman, Moshe
    Korst, Lisa
    [J]. SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2010, 34 (04) : 237 - 243
  • [6] Correlates of Trial of Labor and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean in the United States
    Attanasio, Laura B.
    Paterno, Mary T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2019, 28 (09) : 1302 - 1312
  • [7] Neonatal Mortality Risk for Repeat Cesarean Compared to Vaginal Birth after Cesarean (VBAC) Deliveries in the United States, 1998-2002 Birth Cohorts
    Menacker, Fay
    MacDorman, Marian F.
    Declercq, Eugene
    [J]. MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2010, 14 (02) : 147 - 154
  • [8] Do vaginal birth after cesarean outcomes differ based on hospital setting?
    DeFranco, Emily A.
    Rampersad, Roxane
    Atkins, Kristin L.
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    Stevens, Erika J.
    Peipert, Jeffrey F.
    Stamilio, David M.
    Macones, George A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (04) : 400.e1 - 400.e6
  • [9] Sociodemographic Factors Related to Obtaining a Vaginal Birth After Cesarean in the United States
    Ibrahim, Bridget Basile
    [J]. NURSING RESEARCH, 2018, 67 (02) : E30 - E31
  • [10] Neonatal Mortality Risk for Repeat Cesarean Compared to Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Deliveries in the United States, 1998-2002 Birth Cohorts EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Menacker, Fay
    MacDorman, Marian F.
    Declercq, Eugene
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2010, 65 (07) : 426 - 427