This study investigates how limit orders affect liquidity in a purely order-driven futures market. Additionally, the possible asymmetric relationship between market depth and transitory volatility in bull and bear markets and the effect of institutional trading on liquidity provision behavior are examined as well. The empirical results demonstrate that subsequent market depth increases as transient volatility increases in bull markets. Market depth exhibits significantly positive relationship to subsequent transient volatility in bull markets. Additionally, although trading volume positively influences transient volatility in bull markets, no such relationship exists in bear markets. Liquidity provision decreases when institutional trading activity intensifies during bear markets. Thus, liquidity provision for limit orders differs between bull and bear markets.
机构:
Univ Augsburg, Inst Stat & Math Wirtschaftstheorie, D-86135 Augsburg, GermanyUniv Augsburg, Inst Stat & Math Wirtschaftstheorie, D-86135 Augsburg, Germany
Bamberg, G
Dorfleitner, G
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Augsburg, Inst Stat & Math Wirtschaftstheorie, D-86135 Augsburg, GermanyUniv Augsburg, Inst Stat & Math Wirtschaftstheorie, D-86135 Augsburg, Germany
机构:
Queen Mary Univ London, Sch Econ & Finance, Mile End Rd, London E1 4NS, EnglandQueen Mary Univ London, Sch Econ & Finance, Mile End Rd, London E1 4NS, England
Bianchi, Daniele
Babiak, Mykola
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Lancaster Univ Management Sch, Dept Accounting & Finance, Lancaster, Lancs, EnglandQueen Mary Univ London, Sch Econ & Finance, Mile End Rd, London E1 4NS, England
Babiak, Mykola
Dickerson, Alexander
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Scarman Rd, Coventry CV4 7AL, Warwick, EnglandQueen Mary Univ London, Sch Econ & Finance, Mile End Rd, London E1 4NS, England