The estimation process in the Bayesian quantile structural equation modeling approach

被引:0
|
作者
Shafeeq, Balsam Mustafa [1 ]
Muhamed, Lekaa Ali [2 ]
机构
[1] Middle Tech Univ, Tech Coll Management, Baghdad, Iraq
[2] Univ Baghdad, Coll Adm & Econ, Dept Stat, Baghdad, Iraq
关键词
structural equations model; Bayesian inference; latent variable models; quantile regression;
D O I
10.22075/ijnaa.2022.5909
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Latent variable models define as a wide class of regression models with latent variables that cannot be directly measured, the most important latent variable models are structural equation models. Structural equation modeling (SEM) is a popular multivariate technique for analyzing the interrelationships between latent variables. Structural equation models have been extensively applied to behavioral, medical, and social sciences. In general, structural equation models includes a measurement equation to characterize latent variables through multiple observable variables and a mean regression type structural equation to investigate how the explanatory latent variables affect the outcomes of interest. Despite the importance of the structural equations model, it does not provide an accurate analysis of the relationships between the latent variables. Therefore, the quantile regression method will be presented within the structural equations model to obtain a comprehensive analysis of the latent variables. we apply the quantile regression method into structural equation models to assess the conditional quantile of the outcome latent variable given the explanatory latent variables and covariates. The posterior inference is performed using asymmetric Laplace distribution. The estimation is done using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo technique in Bayesian inference. The simulation was implemented assuming different distributions of the error term for the structural equations model and values for the parameters for a small sample size. The method used showed satisfactorily performs results.
引用
收藏
页码:2137 / 2149
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Estimation Process in Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling Approach
    Yanuar, Ferra
    [J]. 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE & ENGINEERING IN MATHEMATICS, CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS (SCIETECH 2014), 2014, 495
  • [2] Bayesian empirical likelihood estimation of quantile structural equation models
    Yanqing Zhang
    Niansheng Tang
    [J]. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2017, 30 : 122 - 138
  • [3] Bayesian Empirical Likelihood Estimation of Quantile Structural Equation Models
    Zhang Yanqing
    Tang Niansheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE & COMPLEXITY, 2017, 30 (01) : 122 - 138
  • [4] Bayesian Empirical Likelihood Estimation of Quantile Structural Equation Models
    ZHANG Yanqing
    TANG Niansheng
    [J]. Journal of Systems Science & Complexity, 2017, 30 (01) : 122 - 138
  • [5] Structural equation modeling: A Bayesian approach
    Hayashi, Kentaro
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2008, 15 (03) : 534 - 540
  • [6] Bayesian Quantile Structural Equation Models
    Wang, Yifan
    Feng, Xiang-Nan
    Song, Xin-Yuan
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2016, 23 (02) : 246 - 258
  • [7] Structural Equation Modeling, A Bayesian Approach.
    Palomo, Jesus
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2009, 74 (04) : 747 - 748
  • [8] Asymptotic properties of nonparametric estimation and quantile regression in Bayesian structural equation models
    Kim, Gwangsu
    Choi, Taeryon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS, 2019, 171 : 68 - 82
  • [9] Bayesian regularized quantile structural equation models
    Feng, Xiang-Nan
    Wang, Yifan
    Lu, Bin
    Song, Xin-Yuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS, 2017, 154 : 234 - 248
  • [10] Evaluating Factorial Invariance: An Interval Estimation Approach Using Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling
    Shi, Dexin
    Song, Hairong
    DiStefano, Christine
    Maydeu-Olivares, Alberto
    McDaniel, Heather L.
    Jiang, Zhehan
    [J]. MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2019, 54 (02) : 224 - 245