Double Jeopardy: Insurance, Animal Harm, and Domestic Violence

被引:3
|
作者
Signal, Tania [1 ]
Taylor, Nik [6 ]
Burke, Karena J. [2 ,3 ]
Brownlow, Luke [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Cent Queensland Univ, Rockhampton, Qld, Australia
[2] Cent Queensland Univ, Psychol, Rockhampton, Qld, Australia
[3] Cent Queensland Univ, Dept Psychol & Publ Hlth, Rockhampton, Qld, Australia
[4] Cent Queensland Univ, Sch Human Hlth & Social Sci, Rockhampton, Qld, Australia
[5] Cent Queensland Univ, Sch Business & Law, Rockhampton, Qld, Australia
[6] Flinders Univ S Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
domestic violence; animal abuse; pets; insurance discrimination; INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE; AUSTRALIAN VETERINARIANS; ABUSE; EXPERIENCES; ATTITUDES; WOMEN; LINK;
D O I
10.1177/1077801217711266
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Although the role of companion animals within the dynamic of domestic violence (DV) is increasingly recognized, the overlap of animal harm and insurance discrimination for victims/survivors of DV has not been considered. Prompted by a case study presented in a National Link Coalition LINK-Letter, this research note examines Pet Insurance policies available in Australia and whether nonaccidental injury caused by an intimate partner would be covered. We discuss the implications of exclusion criteria for victims/survivors of DV, shelters providing places for animals within a DV dynamic, and, more broadly, for cross- or mandatory-reporting (of animal harm) initiatives.
引用
收藏
页码:718 / 726
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条