Laparoscopic Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision of the Rectum with Primary Suturing: Short-Term Outcomes from Single-Institution Study

被引:19
|
作者
Yang, Xuyang [1 ]
Jin, Chengwu [2 ]
Deng, Xiangbing [1 ]
Wang, Meng [1 ]
Zhang, Yuanchuan [1 ]
Wei, Mingtian [1 ]
Meng, Wenjian [1 ]
Wang, Ziqiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, 37 Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Provinc, Peoples R China
[2] Fifth Peoples Hosp Chengdu, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Chengdu, Sichuan Provinc, Peoples R China
关键词
TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; PELVIC FLOOR; PERINEAL RECONSTRUCTION; POOLED ANALYSIS; CANCER; RESECTION; EXPERIENCE; SURGERY; ELAPE; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1089/lap.2015.0325
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims: This study evaluated the safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision (laparoscopic-ELAPE) with primary suturing for low rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic-ELAPE with primary suturing for low rectal cancer at our institution between September 2013 and January 2015 were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained database. Short-term outcomes, including intraoperative complications, postoperative morbidity, and oncologic adequacy of surgical specimens, were evaluated. Results: Laparoscopic-ELAPE was successful in all 33 included patients, with no patient requiring conversion to an open approach. Mean operation time was 200 minutes, and mean intraoperative blood loss was 90mL. Except for bowel perforation in 2 patients (6.1%), there were no intraoperative complications. Two patients (6.1%) had positive circumferential resection margins. Median length of hospital stay was 7 days. The 30-day morbidity and mortality rates were 15.2% and 0%, respectively. Postoperative complications within 30 postoperative days included perineal wound infection (2 patients, 6.1%), respiratory infection (2 patients, 6.1%), and chylous fistula (1 patient, 3.0%). Complications at a median follow-up time of 12 months (range, 3-19 months) included local tumor recurrence (1 patient, 3.0%), perineal dehiscence (2 patients, 6.1%), perineal seroma (1 patient, 3.0%), bowel obstruction (1 patient, 3.0%), urinary retention (2 patients, 6.1%), and chronic perineal pain (2 patients, 6.1%). There were no instances of perineal hernia, persistent sinus, or peristomal hernia. Conclusions: Laparoscopic-ELAPE with primary suturing appears to be a feasible and safe treatment approach for low rectal cancer, with acceptable short-term outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 46
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: short-term outcomes of a prospective case series
    Kipling, S. L.
    Young, K.
    Foster, J. D.
    Smart, N. J.
    Hunter, A. E.
    Cooper, E.
    Francis, N. K.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2014, 18 (05) : 445 - 451
  • [2] Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: short-term outcomes of a prospective case series
    S. L. Kipling
    K. Young
    J. D. Foster
    N. J. Smart
    A. E. Hunter
    E. Cooper
    N. K. Francis
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2014, 18 : 445 - 451
  • [3] Short-term surgical outcomes and patient quality of life between robotic and laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision for adenocarcinoma of the rectum
    Kamali, D.
    Reddy, A.
    Imam, S.
    Omar, K.
    Jha, A.
    Jha, M.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2017, 99 (08) : 607 - 613
  • [4] A prospective case–control study of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) of the rectum versus conventional laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal excision: comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and quality of life
    P. G. Vaughan-Shaw
    T. Cheung
    J. S. Knight
    P. H. Nichols
    S. A. Pilkington
    A. H. Mirnezami
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2012, 16 : 355 - 362
  • [5] A prospective case-control study of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) of the rectum versus conventional laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal excision: comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and quality of life
    Vaughan-Shaw, P. G.
    Cheung, T.
    Knight, J. S.
    Nichols, P. H.
    Pilkington, S. A.
    Mirnezami, A. H.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2012, 16 (05) : 355 - 362
  • [6] Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: A Surgical Technique for Improved Short-term and Oncological Outcomes in Very-Low Rectal Cancer - Experience of a Single Institution
    Raptis, Dimitrios
    Beradze, Nikolaos
    Martzivanou, Eirini-Chrysovalantou
    Papatzelos, Athanasios
    Velikoudi, Maria
    Basios, Anestis
    Chatzopoulos, Dimitrios
    Vaxevanidou, Archodoula
    Tzitiridou, Maria
    Papaziogas, Thomas
    Papaziogas, Vasilios
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 118 (10): : S1675 - S1675
  • [7] Short term surgical outcomes of biological mesh reconstruction of perineal wounds following extralevator abdominoperineal excision of rectum
    Balasubramanya, Supriya
    Smolarek, Sebastian
    Franklyn, Joshua
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 : 139 - 140
  • [8] Early experience with laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision within an enhanced recovery setting: analysis of short-term outcomes and quality of life
    Vaughan-Shaw, P. G.
    King, A. T.
    Cheung, T.
    Beck, N. E.
    Knight, J. S.
    Nichols, P. H.
    Nugent, K. P.
    Pilkington, S. A.
    Smallwood, J. A.
    Mirnezami, A. H.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2011, 93 (06) : 451 - 459
  • [9] COMPARISON OF SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES OF 3D LAPAROSCOPIC EXTRALEVATOR ABDOMINOPERINEAL EXCISION VERSUS CONVENTIONAL ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION IN LOW RECTAL CANCER.
    Gao, W.
    Fu, C.
    Wang, K.
    Lu, B.
    Zhu, Z.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2019, 62 (06) : E254 - E254
  • [10] Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery in octogenarians with colorectal cancer: a single-institution analysis
    Miguchi, Masashi
    Yoshimitsu, Masanori
    Hakoda, Keishi
    Omori, Ichiro
    Kohashi, Toshihiko
    Hihara, Jun
    Ohdan, Hideki
    Hirabayashi, Naoki
    SURGERY TODAY, 2018, 48 (03) : 292 - 299