COMPARISON, VALIDATION, AND OPTIMIZATION OF INTERNAL GENOMIC DNA EXTRACTION PROTOCOL FOR CAMPYLOBACTER SPECIES

被引:0
|
作者
El Baaboua, Aicha [1 ,2 ]
El Maadoudi, Mohamed [2 ]
Kounnoun, Ayoub [2 ,3 ]
Bougtaib, Hajar [2 ,3 ]
Bouyahya, Abdelhakim [4 ,5 ]
Abrini, Jamal [1 ]
机构
[1] Abdelmalek Essaadi Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Biol, Biol & Hlth Lab,Biotechnol & Appl Microbiol Team, Tetouan, Morocco
[2] Natl Off Food Safety, Reg Lab Anal & Res, Tangier, Morocco
[3] Abdelmalek Essaadi Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Biol, Lab Appl Biol & Pathol, Tetouan, Morocco
[4] Mohammed V Univ, Fac Sci, Lab Human Pathol Biol, Rabat, Morocco
[5] Mohammed V Univ, Genom Ctr Human Pathol, Rabat, Morocco
来源
JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY BIOTECHNOLOGY AND FOOD SCIENCES | 2022年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
Campylobacter spp; DNA extraction; DNA quantity; qPCR; PureLink (TM) Genomic DNA Mini Kit; Wizard((R)) Genomic DNA Purification Kit; ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; JEJUNI; PCR; IDENTIFICATION; PREVALENCE; SPP; PURIFICATION; ENRICHMENT; VIRULENCE;
D O I
10.55251/jmbfs.4549
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Campylobacter remains the leading cause responsible of human gastroenteritis worldwide. The current study aimed to compare the internal DNA extraction protocol with two commercially available kits, using C. jejuni (ATCC((R)) 29428 (TM)) and C. coli (ATCC((R))43478 (TM)) and to validate and optimize the internal protocol through artificial contamination and confirmation of Campylobacter spp. from broiler chickens, turkeys, and beef meats samples. The extraction processes were carried out following the internal protocols steps and the manufacturer's instructions of PureLink (TM) Genomic DNA Mini Kit and Wizard((R)) Genomic DNA Purification Kit, respectively. The agarose gel electrophoresis system was used to control the DNA quality. After that, forty Campylobacter spp. isolates were confirmed, and finally, an artificial contamination of the aforementioned reference strains at three different concentrations was performed with sterilized minced meats. This is the first work comparing the PureLink (TM) Genomic DNA Mini Kit and Wizard((R)) Genomic DNA Purification Kit with internal genomic DNA extraction protocol for Campylobacter spp. The results indicated that the internal protocol provided similar efficiency to the two kits. All confirmed isolates were successfully amplified, in which28 isolates were C. coli and 12 were C. jejuni, as revealed by biochemical tests. A positive amplification was also observed in the three contaminated food matrices, after enrichment, at all examined doses. Except some reactions that were negative at 1 CFU/mL of C. jejuni and C. coli. This was explained by the detection limits of both internal protocol and qPCR. Based on our findings, three crucial steps in determining the extraction of DNA quality of this protocol were amended. Hence, the study highlighted the importance of validating simpler, cheaper and faster DNA extraction protocol, for each laboratory, as part of future risk assessment, control and monitoring programs of Campylobacter frequency required in molecular studies.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An efficient protocol for genomic DNA extraction fromCitrus species
    Yun-Jiang Cheng
    Wen-Wu Guo
    Hua-Lin Yi
    Xiao-Min Pang
    Xiuxin Deng
    Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 2003, 21 (2) : 177 - 178
  • [2] An inexpensive and rapid genomic DNA extraction protocol for rosaceous species
    Antanaviciute, L.
    Harrison, N.
    Battey, N. H.
    Harrison, R. J.
    JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2015, 90 (04): : 427 - 432
  • [3] High-Quality Genomic DNA Extraction Protocol for Bacillus and Clostridium Species
    Mekonnen, Yohannes Beyene
    Aspholm, Marina Elisabeth
    Zegeye, Ephrem Debebe
    CURRENT PROTOCOLS, 2024, 4 (10):
  • [4] An efficient protocol for genomic DNA extraction from the endangered species Rhinopithecus brelichi
    Zhang, Zhi Min
    Xiao, Dai Min
    Qian, Gang
    Li, Xue Ying
    Pan, You Fu
    BIOTECHNOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT, 2015, 29 (03) : 530 - 535
  • [5] Comparison and Optimization of Genomic DNAs Extraction of Four Pathogenic Bacteria by Genomic DNA Extraction Kit for Foodborne Microbial Detection
    Yang J.
    Yang H.
    Chen X.
    Wang Y.
    Zhu L.
    Chen L.
    Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2020, 20 (04) : 246 - 253
  • [6] Modification of CTAB protocol for maize genomic DNA extraction
    Irfan, Muhammad
    Ting, Zhang Ting
    Yang, Wang
    Zhang Chunyu
    Qing, Miao
    Zhang Lijun
    Feng, Lin
    RESEARCH JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2013, 8 (01): : 41 - 45
  • [7] A simplified high yielding miniprep genomic DNA extraction protocol for three chemotypically different plant species
    Adhikari, S.
    Chattopadhyay, S. K.
    Ghosh, P. D.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 11 (03): : 337 - 340
  • [8] An inexpensive and rapid genomic DNA extraction protocol for rosaceous species (vol 90, pg 427, 2015)
    Antanaviciute, L.
    Harrison, N.
    Battey, N. H.
    Harrison, R. J.
    JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 92 (04): : 446 - 446
  • [9] Comparison and optimization of ancient DNA extraction
    Rohland, Nadin
    Hofreiter, Michael
    BIOTECHNIQUES, 2007, 42 (03) : 343 - 352
  • [10] Optimization of genomic DNA extraction from grapevine cultivars
    Aubakirova, Karlygash
    Omasheva, Madina
    Ryabushkina, Natalya
    Yerbolova, Laura
    Tazhibaev, Tolepbergen
    Kampitova, Gulfaridat
    Galiakparov, Nurbol
    NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 29 : S220 - S220