A Comparison of Evidence-Based Practice and the ACRL Information Literacy Standards: Implications for Information Literacy Practice

被引:14
|
作者
Adams, Nancy E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Hershey George T Harrell Hlth Sci Lib, Hershey, PA USA
来源
COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES | 2014年 / 75卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.5860/crl12-417
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Evidence-based practice (EBP), like information literacy, is concerned with an individual's knowledge, skills, and attitudes relating to using information. EBP is now a professional competency in fields as diverse as social work, nursing and allied health fields, and public policy. A comparison of the Association of College and Research Libraries' Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education with the commonly accepted EBP model shows congruence, but the two models diverge in their use of authority of the producer as a marker of information quality and in their relative emphasis on formulation of the research question and application of information.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:232 / 248
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条