Evaluation of Deep Learning-Based Automated Detection of Primary Spine Tumors on MRI Using the Turing Test

被引:15
|
作者
Ouyang, Hanqiang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Meng, Fanyu [4 ,5 ]
Liu, Jianfang [6 ]
Song, Xinhang [4 ]
Li, Yuan [6 ]
Yuan, Yuan [6 ]
Wang, Chunjie [6 ]
Lang, Ning [6 ]
Tian, Shuai [6 ]
Yao, Meiyi [4 ,5 ]
Liu, Xiaoguang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yuan, Huishu [6 ]
Jiang, Shuqiang [4 ]
Jiang, Liang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ Third Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Engn Res Ctr Bone & Joint Precis Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Key Lab Spinal Dis Res, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Comp Technol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Peking Univ Third Hosp, Dept Radiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 12卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
spine tumor; Turing test; deep learning; MRI; primary tumor; STENOSIS;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2022.814667
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundRecently, the Turing test has been used to investigate whether machines have intelligence similar to humans. Our study aimed to assess the ability of an artificial intelligence (AI) system for spine tumor detection using the Turing test. MethodsOur retrospective study data included 12179 images from 321 patients for developing AI detection systems and 6635 images from 187 patients for the Turing test. We utilized a deep learning-based tumor detection system with Faster R-CNN architecture, which generates region proposals by Region Proposal Network in the first stage and corrects the position and the size of the bounding box of the lesion area in the second stage. Each choice question featured four bounding boxes enclosing an identical tumor. Three were detected by the proposed deep learning model, whereas the other was annotated by a doctor; the results were shown to six doctors as respondents. If the respondent did not correctly identify the image annotated by a human, his answer was considered a misclassification. If all misclassification rates were >30%, the respondents were considered unable to distinguish the AI-detected tumor from the human-annotated one, which indicated that the AI system passed the Turing test. ResultsThe average misclassification rates in the Turing test were 51.2% (95% CI: 45.7%-57.5%) in the axial view (maximum of 62%, minimum of 44%) and 44.5% (95% CI: 38.2%-51.8%) in the sagittal view (maximum of 59%, minimum of 36%). The misclassification rates of all six respondents were >30%; therefore, our AI system passed the Turing test. ConclusionOur proposed intelligent spine tumor detection system has a similar detection ability to annotation doctors and may be an efficient tool to assist radiologists or orthopedists in primary spine tumor detection.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Automated Deep Learning-based Detection and Segmentation of Lung Tumors at CT Imaging
    Kashyap, Mehr
    Wang, Xi
    Panjwani, Neil
    Hasan, Mohammad
    Zhang, Qin
    Huang, Charles
    Bush, Karl
    Chin, Alexander
    Vitzthum, Lucas K.
    Dong, Peng
    Zaky, Sandra
    Loo, Billy W.
    Diehn, Maximilian
    Xing, Lei
    Li, Ruijiang
    Gensheimer, Michael F.
    RADIOLOGY, 2025, 314 (01)
  • [2] Fully Automated Deep Learning-Based Renal Mass Detection on Multi-Parametric MRI
    Gaikar, Rohini
    Azad, Azar
    Schieda, Nicola
    Ukwatta, Eranga
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 112714 - 112728
  • [3] Machine learning-based automated scan prescription of lumbar spine MRI acquisitions
    Ozhinsky, Eugene
    Liu, Felix
    Pedoia, Valentina
    Majumdar, Sharmila
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2024, 110 : 29 - 34
  • [4] Deep Learning-Based Automated Cell Detection-Facilitated Meat Quality Evaluation
    Zheng, Hui
    Zhao, Nan
    Xu, Saifei
    He, Jin
    Ospina, Ricardo
    Qiu, Zhengjun
    Liu, Yufei
    FOODS, 2024, 13 (14)
  • [5] Evaluation of a Cascaded Deep Learning-based Algorithm for Prostate Lesion Detection at Biparametric MRI
    Lin, Yue
    Yilmaz, Enis C.
    Belue, Mason J.
    Harmon, Stephanie A.
    Tetreault, Jesse
    Phelps, Tim E.
    Merriman, Katie M.
    Hazen, Lindsey
    Garcia, Charisse
    Yang, Dong
    Xu, Ziyue
    Lay, Nathan S.
    Toubaji, Antoun
    Merino, Maria J.
    Xu, Daguang
    Law, Yan Mee
    Gurram, Sandeep
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Turkbey, Baris
    RADIOLOGY, 2024, 311 (02)
  • [6] Automated Breast Cancer Detection in Mammograms using Transfer Learning-based Deep Learning Models
    Katiyar, Preeti
    Singh, Krishna
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2025, 19 (01) : XC1 - XC6
  • [7] A review on deep learning-based automated lunar crater detection
    Chaini, Chinmayee
    Jha, Vijay Kumar
    EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2024, 17 (05) : 3863 - 3898
  • [8] Deep Learning-Based Automated Intracranial Hemorrhage Detection and Notification
    Zahneisen, Benjamin
    Straka, Matus
    Bammer, Shalini
    Albers, Greg
    Bammer, Roland
    STROKE, 2020, 51
  • [9] Deep learning-based reconstruction for acceleration of lumbar spine MRI: a prospective comparison with standard MRI
    Yoo, Hyunsuk
    Yoo, Roh-Eul
    Choi, Seung Hong
    Hwang, Inpyeong
    Lee, Ji Ye
    Seo, June Young
    Koh, Seok Young
    Choi, Kyu Sung
    Kang, Koung Mi
    Yun, Tae Jin
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (12) : 8656 - 8668
  • [10] Automated structural bolt looseness detection using deep learning-based prediction model
    Yuan, Cheng
    Wang, Shuyin
    Qi, Yanzhi
    Kong, Qingzhao
    STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2022, 29 (03):