Duloxetine in the treatment of depression - A double-blind-placebo-controlled comparison with paroxetine

被引:255
|
作者
Goldstein, DJ
Lu, YL
Detke, MJ [1 ]
Wiltse, C
Mallinckrodt, C
Demitrack, MA
机构
[1] Eli Lilly & Co, Lilly Corp Ctr, Lilly Res Labs, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
[2] PRN Consulting, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pharmacol & Toxicol, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[4] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[5] McLean Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Belmont, MA 02178 USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Neuronet Inc, Malvern, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.jcp.0000132448.65972.d9
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Context: Major depressive disorder causes significant morbidity and mortality. Current therapies fail to fully treat both emotional and physical symptoms of major depressive disorder. Objective: To evaluate duloxetine, a dual reuptake inhibitor of serotonin and norepinephrine, on improvement of emotional and painful physical symptoms. Design: Randomized, double-blind, evaluation of duloxetine at 40 mg/d (20 mg twice daily) and 80 mg/d (40 mg twice daily) versus placebo and paroxetine 20 mg/d in depressed Outpatients. Main Outcome Measures: The primary efficacy measure was the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Visual Analog Scales for pain, Clinical Global Impression of Severity, Patient's Global Impression of Improvement, and Quality of Life in Depression Scale were also used. Safety was evaluated by assessing discontinuation rates, adverse event rates, vital signs, and laboratory tests. Results: Duloxetine 80 mg/d was superior to placebo on mean 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale total change by 3.62 points (95% CI 1.38, 5.86; P = 0.002). Duloxetine at 40 mg/d was also significantly superior to placebo by 2.43 points (95% Cl 0.19, 4.66; P = 0.034), while paroxetine was not (1.51 points; 95% Cl -0.55, 3.56; P = 0.150). Duloxetine 80 mg/d was superior to placebo for most other measures, including overall pain severity, and was superior to paroxetine on 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale improvement (by 2.39 points; 95% CI 0.14, 4.65; P = 0.037) and estimated probability of remission (57% for duloxetine 80 mg/d, 34% for paroxetine; P = 0.022). The only adverse event reported significantly more frequently for duloxetine 80 mg/d than for paroxetine was insomnia (19.8% for duloxetine 80 mg/d, 8.0% for paroxetine; P = 0.031). Hypertension incidence was not affected by any treatment. Conclusion: Duloxetine therapy was efficacious for emotional and physical symptoms of depression, with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-like profile of side effects.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 399
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Duloxetine in the treatment of depression: A double-blind placebo-controlled comparison with paroxetine
    Mallinckrodt, C
    Goldstein, DJ
    Lu, Y
    Detke, M
    Wiltse, C
    Demitrack, MA
    [J]. EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 12 : S214 - S214
  • [2] Duloxetine in the treatment of depression: a double-blind placebo-controlled comparison with paroxetine
    Goldstein, DJ
    Lu, Y
    Detke, M
    Wiltse, C
    Mallinckrodt, C
    Demitrack, MA
    [J]. EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 12 : S43 - S44
  • [3] Duloxetine in the treatment of depression: A double-blind placebo-controlled comparison with paroxetine
    Goldstein, DJ
    Lu, Y
    Detke, M
    Wiltse, C
    Mallinckrodt, C
    Demitrack, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2002, 68 (01) : 108 - 109
  • [4] Duloxetine in the treatment of depression: a double-blind placebo-controlled comparison with paroxetine
    Goldstein, D
    Bitter, I
    Lu, Y
    Detke, M
    Wiltse, C
    Mallinckrodt, C
    Demitrack, M
    [J]. EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 17 : 98S - 98S
  • [5] Duloxetine in the treatment of depression: A double-blind placebo-controlled comparison with paroxetine
    Goldstein, DJ
    Yili, L
    Detke, M
    Wiltse, C
    Mallinckrodt, C
    Demitrack, MA
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 51 (08) : 123S - 123S
  • [6] Duloxetine in the treatment of depression: A double-blind placebo-controlled comparison with paroxetine
    Goldstein, DJ
    Lu, Y
    Detke, M
    Wiltse, C
    Mallinckrodt, C
    Perahia, DG
    Demitrack, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 16 (03) : A43 - A43
  • [7] Double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of imipramine and paroxetine in the treatment of bipolar depression
    Nemeroff, CB
    Evans, DL
    Gyulai, L
    Sachs, GS
    Bowden, CL
    Gergel, IP
    Oakes, R
    Pitts, CD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 158 (06): : 906 - 912
  • [8] A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF PAROXETINE, IMIPRAMINE, AND PLACEBO IN MAJOR DEPRESSION
    SHRIVASTAVA, RK
    SHRIVASTAVA, SHP
    OVERWEG, N
    BLUMHARDT, CL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1992, 53 : 48 - 51
  • [9] A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF PAROXETINE AND PLACEBO IN THE TREATMENT OF DEPRESSED OUTPATIENTS
    CLAGHORN, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 6 : 25 - 30
  • [10] Changes in energy during treatment of depression: an analysis of duloxetine in double-blind placebo-controlled trials
    Harada, E.
    Kato, M.
    Fujikoshi, S.
    Wohlreich, M. M.
    Berggren, L.
    Tokuoka, H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2015, 69 (10) : 1139 - 1148