Evaluation of the effects of motion mitigation strategies on respiration-induced motion in each pancreatic region using cine-magnetic resonance imaging

被引:6
|
作者
Fujimoto, Koya [1 ]
Shiinoki, Takehiro [1 ]
Yuasa, Yuki [1 ]
Onizuka, Ryota [2 ]
Yamane, Masatoshi [2 ]
机构
[1] Yamaguchi Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Yamaguchi, Japan
[2] Yamaguchi Univ, Dept Radiol Technol, Yamaguchi, Japan
来源
关键词
cine-magnetic resonance imaging; motion mitigation strategies; pancreas; respiration-induced motion; 4-DIMENSIONAL COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; AUDIOVISUAL BIOFEEDBACK; TUMOR; SURVIVAL; TRACKING; IMPROVES; CANCER;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.12693
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose This study aimed to quantify the respiration-induced motion in each pancreatic region during motion mitigation strategies and to characterize the correlations between this motion and that of the surrogate signals in cine-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We also aimed to evaluate the effects of these motion mitigation strategies in each pancreatic region. Methods Sagittal and coronal two-dimensional cine-MR images were obtained in 11 healthy volunteers, eight of whom also underwent imaging with abdominal compression (AC). For each pancreatic region, the magnitude of pancreatic motion with and without motion mitigation and the positional error between the actual and predicted pancreas motion based on surrogate signals were evaluated. Results The magnitude of pancreatic motion with and without AC in the left-right (LR) and superior-inferior (SI) directions varied depending on the pancreatic region. In respiratory gating (RG) assessments based on a surrogate signal, although the correlation was reasonable, the positional error was large in the pancreatic tail region. Furthermore, motion mitigation in the anterior-posterior and SI directions with RG was more effective than was that with AC in the head region. Conclusions This study revealed pancreatic region-dependent variations in respiration-induced motion and their effects on motion mitigation outcomes during AC or RG. The magnitude of pancreatic motion with or without AC and the magnitude of the positional error with RG varied depending on the pancreatic region. Therefore, during radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer, it is important to consider that the effects of motion mitigation during AC or RG may differ depending on the pancreatic region.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 50
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantification of Esophageal Tumor Motion on Cine-Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Lever, Frederiek M.
    Lips, Irene M.
    Crijns, Sjoerd P. M.
    Reerink, Onne
    van Lier, Astrid L. H. M. W.
    Moerland, Marinus A.
    van Vulpen, Marco
    Meijer, Gert J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 88 (02): : 419 - 424
  • [2] ASSESSMENT OF BLADDER MOTION FOR CLINICAL RADIOTHERAPY PRACTICE USING CINE-MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
    McBain, Catherine A.
    Khoo, Vincent S.
    Buckley, David L.
    Sykes, Jonathan S.
    Green, Melanie M.
    Cowan, Richard A.
    Hutchinson, Charles E.
    Moore, Christopher J.
    Price, Patricia M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (03): : 664 - 671
  • [3] Prostate gland motion assessed with cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI)
    Ghilezan, MJ
    Jaffray, DA
    Siewerdsen, JH
    van Herk, M
    Shetty, A
    Sharpe, MB
    Jafri, SZ
    Vicini, FA
    Matter, RC
    Brabbins, DS
    Martinez, AA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 62 (02): : 406 - 417
  • [4] Three-dimensional motion of liver tumors using cine-magnetic resonance imaging
    Kirilova, Anna
    Lockwood, Gina
    Math, M.
    Choi, Perry
    Bana, Neelufer
    Haider, Masoom A.
    Brock, Kristy K.
    Eccles, Cynthia
    Dawson, Laura A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 71 (04): : 1189 - 1195
  • [5] COMPARISON OF LIVER TUMOR MOTION WITH AND WITHOUT ABDOMINAL COMPRESSION USING CINE-MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
    Eccles, Cynthia L.
    Patel, Ritesh
    Simeonov, Anna K.
    Lockwood, Gina
    Haider, Masoom
    Dawson, Laura A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 79 (02): : 602 - 608
  • [6] Respiratory-induced Prostate Motion in the Supine and Prone Positions as Assessed by Cine-magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Nakamura, K.
    Anai, S.
    Hirakawa, M.
    Miyasaka, M.
    Yoshikawa, H.
    Sasaki, T.
    Shioyama, Y.
    Ohga, S.
    Terashima, K.
    Honda, H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S386 - S386
  • [7] Audiovisual Biofeedback Improves Cine-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measured Lung Tumor Motion Consistency
    Lee, Danny
    Greer, Peter B.
    Ludbrook, Joanna
    Arm, Jameen
    Hunter, Perry
    Pollock, Sean
    Makhija, Kuldeep
    O'brien, Ricky T.
    Kim, Taeho
    Keall, Paul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 94 (03): : 628 - 636
  • [8] EVALUATION OF CARDIAC MOTION AND FUNCTION BY CINE MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING
    KONDO, T
    KUROKAWA, H
    ANNO, H
    OKAMURA, M
    ANNO, N
    SAKAKURA, K
    TOKUDA, M
    HISHIDA, H
    WATANABE, Y
    MIZUNO, Y
    SUGIISHI, M
    JAPANESE CIRCULATION JOURNAL-ENGLISH EDITION, 1992, 56 (06): : 632 - 638
  • [9] Can Belly Board Reduce Respiratory-induced Prostate Motion in the Prone Position? Assessed by Cine-magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Terashima, K.
    Nakamura, K.
    Shioyama, Y.
    Sasaki, T.
    Ohga, S.
    Nonoshita, T.
    Yoshitake, T.
    Atsumi, K.
    Asai, K.
    Honda, H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S359 - S359
  • [10] Can a Belly Board Reduce Respiratory-induced Prostate Motion in the Prone Position? - Assessed by Cine-magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Terashima, K.
    Nakamura, K.
    Shioyama, Y.
    Sasaki, T.
    Ohga, S.
    Nonoshita, T.
    Yoshitake, T.
    Atsumi, K.
    Asai, K.
    Hirakawa, M.
    Anai, S.
    Yoshikawa, H.
    Honda, H.
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2013, 12 (05) : 447 - 453