Genetic Population Structure of Shoal Bass within their Native Range\

被引:9
|
作者
Taylor, Andrew T. [1 ]
Tringali, Michael D. [2 ]
Sammons, Steven M. [3 ]
Ingram, Travis R. [4 ]
O'Rouke, Patrick M. [5 ]
Peterson, Douglas L. [6 ]
Long, James M. [7 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Nat Resource Ecol & Management, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
[2] Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservat Commiss, Fish & Wildlife Res Inst, St Petersburg, FL 33701 USA
[3] Auburn Univ, Sch Fisheries Aquaculture & Aquat Sci, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[4] Georgia Dept Nat Resources, 2024 Newton Rd, Albany, GA 31701 USA
[5] Georgia Power Co, 2480 Maner Rd Southeast, Atlanta, GA 30339 USA
[6] Univ Georgia, Warnell Sch Forestry & Nat Resources, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[7] Oklahoma State Univ, US Geol Survey, Oklahoma Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, Dept Nat Resource Ecol & Management, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
关键词
FLINT RIVER; INBREEDING COEFFICIENTS; OUTBREEDING DEPRESSION; PAIRWISE RELATEDNESS; LARGEMOUTH BASS; HABITAT USE; CONSERVATION; GEORGIA; MOVEMENT; ALABAMA;
D O I
10.1002/nafm.10048
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Endemic to the Apalachicola River basin of the southeastern USA, the Shoal Bass Micropterus cataractae is a fluvial-specialist sport fish that is imperiled because of anthropogenic habitat alteration. To counter population declines, restorative stocking efforts are becoming an increasingly relevant management strategy. However, population genetic structure within the species is currently unknown, but it could influence management decisions, such as brood source location. Leveraging a collaborative effort to collect and genotype specimens with 16 microsatellite loci, our objective was to characterize hierarchical population structure and genetic differentiation of the Shoal Bass across its native range, including an examination of structuring mechanisms, such as relatedness and inbreeding levels. Specimens identified as Shoal Bass were collected from 13 distinct sites (N ranged from 17 to 209 per location) and were then taxonomically screened to remove nonnative congeners and hybrids (pure Shoal Bass N ranged from 13 to 183 per location). Our results revealed appreciable population structure, with five distinct Shoal Bass populations identifiable at the uppermost hierarchical level that generally corresponded with natural geographic features and anthropogenic barriers. Substructure was recovered within several of these populations, wherein differences appeared related to spatial isolation and local population dynamics. An analysis of molecular variance revealed that 3.6% of the variation in our data set was accounted for among three larger river drainages, but substructure within each river drainage also explained an additional 8.9% of genetic variation, demonstrating that management at a scale lower than the river drainage level would likely best conserve genetic diversity. Results provide a population genetic framework that can inform future management decisions, such as brood source location, so that genetic diversity within and among populations is conserved and overall adaptability of the species is maintained.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 564
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Population genetic structure of the catadromous Australian bass from throughout its range
    Jerry, DR
    JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, 1997, 51 (05) : 909 - 920
  • [2] The Development of a Genetic Conservation Program for the Florida Bass in Its Native Range
    Porak, Wesley F.
    Barthel, Brandon L.
    Stout, Richard B.
    Tringali, Michael D.
    Matthews, Michael
    Pouder, William F.
    Philipp, David P.
    BLACK BASS DIVERSITY: MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCE FOR CONSERVATION, 2015, 82 : 585 - 600
  • [3] Habitat Use, Home Range, and Movement of Shoal Bass in Alabama
    Stormer, David G.
    Maceina, Michael J.
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES MANAGEMENT, 2009, 29 (03) : 604 - 613
  • [4] Assessment of the Shoal Bass Population in the Lower Flint River, Georgia
    Ingram, Travis R.
    Kilpatrick, John M.
    BLACK BASS DIVERSITY: MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCE FOR CONSERVATION, 2015, 82 : 157 - 168
  • [5] Relative Abundance, Distribution, and Population Metrics of Shoal Bass in Alabama
    Stormer, David G.
    Maceina, Michael J.
    JOURNAL OF FRESHWATER ECOLOGY, 2008, 23 (04) : 651 - 661
  • [6] Population genetic structure ofAnoplophora glabripennisin South Korea: Invasive populations in the native range?
    Lee, Seunghyun
    Lee, Yerim
    Lee, Seunghwan
    JOURNAL OF PEST SCIENCE, 2020, 93 (04) : 1181 - 1196
  • [7] Population genetic structure of Anoplophora glabripennis in South Korea: Invasive populations in the native range?
    Seunghyun Lee
    Yerim Lee
    Seunghwan Lee
    Journal of Pest Science, 2020, 93 : 1181 - 1196
  • [8] Genetic structure of Carcinus maenas within its native range: larval dispersal and oceanographic variability
    Domingues, Carla P.
    Creer, Simon
    Taylor, Martin I.
    Queiroga, Henrique
    Carvalho, Gary R.
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2010, 410 : 111 - 123
  • [9] Genetic diversity and population structure of the Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis in its native range
    Sui, Liying
    Zhang, Fumin
    Wang, Xiaomei
    Bossier, Peter
    Sorgeloos, Patrick
    Haenfling, Bernd
    MARINE BIOLOGY, 2009, 156 (08) : 1573 - 1583
  • [10] Population genetic structure of the predatory, social wasp Vespula pensylvanica in its native and invasive range
    Chau, Linh M.
    Hanna, Cause
    Jenkins, Laurel T.
    Kutner, Rachel E.
    Burns, Elizabeth A.
    Kremen, Claire
    Goodisman, Michael A. D.
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2015, 5 (23): : 5573 - 5587