Flight performance of Crew Escape System during pad abort condition

被引:1
|
作者
Somanath, S. [1 ]
Nair, S. Unnikrishnan [2 ]
Sivamurugan, T. [1 ]
Desikan, S. L. N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Space Res Org, Vikram Sarabhai Space Ctr, Thiruvananthapuram 695022, Kerala, India
[2] Indian Space Res Org, Human Space Flight Ctr, Bengaluru 560054, India
来源
CURRENT SCIENCE | 2021年 / 120卷 / 01期
关键词
Crew Escape System; Crew Module; flight performance; pad abort;
D O I
10.18520/cs/v120/i1/81-88
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
As a prologue to the Gaganyaan project, ISRO successfully test fired one of the critical and essential technologies for human space flight, i.e. Crew Escape System (CES) Pad Abort Test on 5 July 2018. This is a strategically important flight as a part of various qualification tests that ensures emergency escape measure to quickly pull the Crew Module (CM) along with the astronauts to a safe distance from the launch vehicle in case of any eventuality. CES along with CM weighing of 12.6 tonnes lifted-off at 07.00 h from the Sounding Rocket Complex Launch Pad, Sriharikota. The vehicle was taken to an altitude of 3 km using a specially developed solid motor with multiple reverse flow and scarfed nozzles with 10 g acceleration. Around 330 sensors on-board were used to measure its performance. The data obtained ensured that the adopted design philosophy and approaches such as CM reorientation, aerodynamic data with jet-on environment, mission sequences, performance of special solid motors, deceleration system, etc. were in order. This provides more confidence to progress to the next level of demonstration as a part of Gaganyaan.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 88
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ORION MULTI-PURPOSE CREW MODULE PAD ABORT FLIGHT TEST OVERVIEW AND SUMMARY
    Burt, Richard R.
    Pratt, William D.
    Begley, Michael E.
    GUIDANCE AND CONTROL 2012, 2012, 144 : 665 - 684
  • [2] Orion multi-purpose crew module pad abort flight test overview and summary
    Burt, Richard R.
    Pratt, William D.
    Begley, Michael E.
    Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, 2012, 144 : 665 - 684
  • [3] Mission design, preflight and flight performance and observations for Pad Abort Test
    Dhaoya, Jayanta
    Remesh, N.
    Ravikumar, C.
    Bhanumathy, P.
    Anilkumar, A. K.
    Kumar, Abhay
    Ashok, V
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2021, 120 (01): : 89 - 95
  • [4] Aerothermal design of Crew Escape System
    Lakshmi, K. S.
    Prabhu, M. Ram
    Padmanabhan, Rishi
    Pandey, Ullekh
    Manirajan, M.
    Anoop, P.
    Sivamurugan, T.
    Sundar, B.
    Chacko, M. J.
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2021, 120 (01): : 110 - 115
  • [5] Aircraft crew escape system assistant
    Grzesik, N.
    Czapla, R.
    SAFETY AND RELIABILITY: METHODOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS, 2015, : 791 - 796
  • [6] Spaceflight crew escape system demonstrator
    不详
    AIRCRAFT ENGINEERING AND AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 76 (03): : 332 - 333
  • [7] Evolution of Crew Escape System configuration
    Sreenivasulu, Juluri
    Saha, Sanjoy Kumar
    Patil, M. M.
    Ashok, V
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2021, 120 (01): : 96 - 104
  • [8] Flight Hours and Flight Crew Performance in Commercial Aviation
    Todd, Melanie A.
    Thomas, Matthew J. W.
    AVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2012, 83 (08): : 776 - 782
  • [9] Onset separation aerodynamics of Crew Module from Crew Escape System
    Saravanan, R.
    Tennyson, J. A.
    Desikan, S. L. N.
    Pati, M. M.
    Kalimuthu, R.
    Surendranath
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2021, 120 (01): : 105 - 109
  • [10] Does SOFIA require a crew escape system?
    Datta, Koushik
    Wiltsee, Christopher B.
    Briceno, Anthony
    2006 PROCEEDINGS - ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2006, : 539 - +