Motion Planning using Hierarchical Aggregation of Workspace Obstacles

被引:0
|
作者
Ghosh, Mukulika [1 ]
Thomas, Shawna [1 ]
Morales, Marco [2 ]
Rodriguez, Sam [1 ,3 ]
Amato, Nancy M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Parasol Lab, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Inst Tecnol Autonomo Mexico, Dept Digital Syst, Mexico City 01080, DF, Mexico
[3] Texas Wesleyan Univ, Ft Worth, TX 76105 USA
关键词
FRAMEWORK; PATH;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Sampling-based motion planning is the state-of-the-art technique for solving challenging motion planning problems in a wide variety of domains. While generally successful, their performance suffers from increasing problem complexity. In many cases, the full problem complexity is not needed for the entire solution. We present a hierarchical aggregation framework that groups and models sets of obstacles based on the currently needed level of detail. The hierarchy enables sampling to be performed using the simplest and most conservative representation of the environment possible in that region. Our results show that this scheme improves planner performance irrespective of the underlying sampling method and input problem. In many cases, improvement is significant, with running times often less than 60% of the original planning time.
引用
收藏
页码:5716 / 5721
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Understanding the Geometry of Workspace Obstacles in Motion Optimization
    Ratliff, Nathan
    Toussaint, Marc
    Schaal, Stefan
    [J]. 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION (ICRA), 2015, : 4202 - 4209
  • [2] Motion planning in dynamic environments using velocity obstacles
    Fiorini, P
    Shiller, Z
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH, 1998, 17 (07): : 760 - 772
  • [3] Motion Planning with Cartesian Workspace Information
    Liu, Bangshang
    Scheurer, Christian
    Janschek, Klaus
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2020, 53 (02): : 9826 - 9833
  • [4] Motion planning for nonholonomic robots in a limited workspace
    Shkel, AM
    Lumelsky, VJ
    [J]. 1998 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS - PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-3: INNOVATIONS IN THEORY, PRACTICE AND APPLICATIONS, 1998, : 1473 - 1478
  • [5] MOTION PLANNING AMID TRANSIENT OBSTACLES
    FUJIMURA, K
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH, 1994, 13 (05): : 395 - 407
  • [6] MOTION PLANNING IN THE PRESENCE OF MOVING OBSTACLES
    REIF, J
    SHARIR, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACM, 1994, 41 (04) : 764 - 790
  • [7] Motion planning for mobile robots using the Collidable Velocity Obstacles method
    Gyenes, Zoltan
    Szadeczky-Kardoss, Emese Gincsaine
    [J]. 2022 30TH MEDITERRANEAN CONFERENCE ON CONTROL AND AUTOMATION (MED), 2022, : 737 - 742
  • [8] Autonomous driving motion planning with obstacles prioritization using lexicographic optimization
    Rasekhipour, Yadollah
    Fadakar, Iman
    Khajepour, Amir
    [J]. CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2018, 77 : 235 - 246
  • [9] Motion planning for mobile robots using the Safety Velocity Obstacles method
    Gyenes, Zoltan
    Szadeczky-Kardoss, Emese Gincsaine
    [J]. 2018 19TH INTERNATIONAL CARPATHIAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ICCC), 2018, : 389 - 394
  • [10] Motion Planning With Dynamic Obstacles Using Convexified Control Barrier Functions
    Varun, V. P.
    Vinod, Abraham P.
    Kolathaya, Shishir
    [J]. 2021 SEVENTH INDIAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ICC), 2021, : 81 - 86