European Court of Human Rights -: Limited responsibility of European Union member states for actions within the scope of community law.: Judgment of 30 June 2005, Bosphorus Airways v. Ireland, Application No. 45036/98

被引：14

作者：

Peers, Steve ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England

来源：

EUROPEAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REVIEW | 2006年 / 2卷 / 03期

关键词：

Bosphorus; Cantoni; Cilfit; Community action; Community law; Compromise position; European convention on human rights; European Court of Justice; European Union; International organizations; Kandova; Legal basis; Matthews; Member states; Member states' action; Responsibility; Review; Scope; Transfer of sovereignty;

D O I：

10.1017/S1574019606004433

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

The position of human rights within the European Union legal order has been an issue since the early years of the original European Economic Community. For many years, the development of human rights as general principles of Community law was characterized by dialogue and debate between the Communities's Court of Justice on the one hand, and certain national constitutional courts on the other, as regards the protection of human rights recognized in national constitutions by the Community legal order. But in recent years, there has been a parallel dialogue between the Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights, as regards the Community legal order's protection of the rights guaranteed by the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR). © 2006 T.M.C. Asser Press and Contributors.

引用

页码：443 / 455

页数：13

共 4 条

[1] European Convention on Human Rights -: reviewability of national actions to implement EU law -: impounding aircraft -: right to property -: Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm Ve Ticaret Anonim Sirket v. Ireland.: App. No. 45036/98.: At ⟨http://www.echr.coe.int⟩.: European Court of Human Rights (Grand chamber), June 30, 2005
Hoffmeister, Frank
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2006, 100 (02) : 442 - 449
[2] Jurisprudence of other courts Gloss to the Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of June 9, 2009 in Opuz v. Turkey (Application no. 33401/02)
Drewicz, Marcin
PRZEGLAD SEJMOWY, 2010, (03): : 167 - 175
[3] European Court of Human Rights -: After Sahin:: The debate on headscarves is not over, Leyla Sahin v. Turkey, grand chamber judgment of 10 November 2005, application No. 44774/98
Altiparmak, Kerern
Karahanogullari, Onur
EUROPEAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REVIEW, 2006, 2 (02) : 268 - 292
[4] Jurisprudence of other courts Gloss to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of June 15, 2010 in the case of Grzelak v. Poland (Application no. 7710/02)
Lacki, Pawel
PRZEGLAD SEJMOWY, 2011, (02): : 194 - 204

← 1 →