Laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy

被引:33
|
作者
Giessing, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Berlin, Germany
关键词
kidney transplantation; laparoscopy; laparoscopic techniques; living donor; kidney donation;
D O I
10.1093/ndt/gfh1039
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background. In order to increase the number of renal donors, laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy (LLDN) was first performed 8 years ago. Today, LLDN is a routine procedure in many centres worldwide. We reviewed the literature with regard to extend the use of this method, the feasibility and safety for donor, graft and recipient. Laparoscopic and open-donor nephrectomy are compared, and the impact of LLDN on donors' willingness is evaluated. Methods. Literature search (PubMed, DIMDI, Medline) for the period from 1995 to 2003. Results. More than 200 centres worldwide perform LLDN. It is a feasible and safe surgical procedure. For the donor, LLDN has numerous advantages, while graft and recipient outcome are the same as with the open approach. The learning curve on the way to performing this operation safely is long, and surgeons planning to integrate LLDN into their programme must be trained thoroughly. There are some indications that with LLDN the number of donors willing to donate a kidney can be increased. Conclusions. LLDN is widely used and will spread further. It is of the utmost importance to undergo thorough laparoscopic training in general urology prior to performing this procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 40
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy as an alternative to traditional laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy
    Buell, JF
    Hanaway, MJ
    Potter, SR
    Cronin, DC
    Yoshida, A
    Munda, R
    Alexander, JW
    Newell, KA
    Bruce, DS
    Woodle, ES
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 2 (10) : 983 - 988
  • [2] Laparoscopic Living-Donor Nephrectomy: Is It Really Better?
    Lechevallier, Eric
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 58 (04) : 510 - 511
  • [3] Quality of Life Following Laparoscopic Living-Donor Nephrectomy
    Bahler, Clinton D.
    Sundaram, Chandru P.
    [J]. JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2013, 17 (02) : 273 - 278
  • [4] Retroperitoneal laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy - Preliminary results
    Hoznek, A
    Olsson, LE
    Salomon, L
    Saint, F
    Cicco, A
    Chopin, D
    Abbou, CC
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 40 (06) : 614 - 618
  • [5] Laparoscopic Living-Donor Nephrectomy: Analysis of the Existing Literature
    Greco, Francesco
    Hoda, M. Raschid
    Alcaraz, Antonio
    Bachmann, Alexander
    Hakenberg, Oliver W.
    Fornara, Paolo
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 58 (04) : 498 - 509
  • [6] RETROPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC LIVING-DONOR NEPHRECTOMY: CHI MEI EXPERIENCE
    Wang, Jhih Cheng
    Huan, Steven K.
    Tian, Yu-Feng
    Lee, Ling-Hsien
    Chiu, Allen W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A212 - A213
  • [7] The economic impact of laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy on kidney transplantation
    Mullins, CD
    Thomas, SK
    Pradel, FG
    Bartlett, ST
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 75 (09) : 1505 - 1512
  • [8] Cost Effectiveness of Open Versus Laparoscopic Living-Donor Nephrectomy
    Hamidi, Vida
    Andersen, Marit Helen
    Oyen, Ole
    Mathisen, Lars
    Fosse, Erik
    Kristiansen, Ivar Sonbo
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 87 (06) : 831 - 838
  • [9] Laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy: Shorter operating time for right kidney
    不详
    [J]. Nature Clinical Practice Nephrology, 2008, 4 (5): : 242 - 243
  • [10] Use of the LigaSure vessel sealing device in laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy
    Constant, DL
    Florman, SS
    Mendez, F
    Thomas, R
    Slakey, DP
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 78 (11) : 1661 - 1664