Supporting conceptualisation processes in collaborative networks: a case study on an R&D project

被引:9
|
作者
Pereira, Carla [1 ,2 ]
Sousa, Cristovao [1 ,2 ]
Soares, Antonio Lucas [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Polytech Inst Porto, CIICESI ESTGF, P-4610156 Felgueiras, Portugal
[2] INESC TEC, P-4200 Oporto, Portugal
[3] Univ Porto, Fac Engn, Dept Informat Engn, P-4200 Oporto, Portugal
关键词
conceptualisation processes; ontology engineering; collaborative networks; BUILDING ONTOLOGIES; ENVIRONMENT; METHODOLOGIES; INTEGRATION; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1080/0951192X.2012.684714
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The development of new products or processes involves the creation, re-creation and integration of conceptual models from the related scientific and technical domains. Particularly, in the context of collaborative networks of organisations (CNO) (e.g. a multi-partner, international project) such developments can be seriously hindered by conceptual misunderstandings and misalignments, resulting from participants with different backgrounds or organisational cultures, for example. The research described in this article addresses this problem by proposing a method and the tools to support the collaborative development of shared conceptualisations in the context of a collaborative network of organisations. The theoretical model is based on a socio-semantic perspective, while the method is inspired by the conceptual integration theory from the cognitive semantics field. The modelling environment is built upon a semantic wiki platform. The majority of the article is devoted to developing an informal ontology in the context of a European R&D project, studied using action research. The case study results validated the logical structure of the method and showed the utility of the method.
引用
收藏
页码:1066 / 1086
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] STABILITY OF COLLABORATIVE R&D NETWORKS: A SIMULATION STUDY
    Gust, Peter
    Altfeld, Nils
    Kreutzfeldt, Jochen
    [J]. GAIN COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE BY MANAGING COMPLEXITY, 2012, : 385 - +
  • [2] An integrated method for collaborative R&D project selection: Supporting innovative research teams
    Feng, Bo
    Ma, Jian
    Fan, Zhi-Ping
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (05) : 5532 - 5543
  • [3] Collaborative R&D Project Management: The Case of the National Power Quality Project of Turkey
    Terciyanli, Erman
    Seker, Vedat
    Ozturk, Tugrul C.
    Aksuyek, Hasan S.
    [J]. 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, 2007, : 186 - +
  • [4] DETERMINING THE STABILITY OF COLLABORATIVE R&D NETWORKS
    Altfeld, Nils
    Hinckeldeyn, Johannes
    Kreutzfeldt, Jochen
    Gust, Peter
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL 7, 2012, : 673 - +
  • [5] Inter-firm knowledge transfer in R&D project networks: A multiple case study
    Majuri, Matti
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2022, 115
  • [6] R&D Project Valuation Considering Changes of Economic Environment: A Case of a Pharmaceutical R&D Project
    Park, Jung Ho
    Shin, Kwangsoo
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (04)
  • [7] How can R&D programs induce unplanned R&D collaborative networks in clusters?
    Belso-Martinez, Jose A.
    Diez-Vial, Isabel
    Lopez-Sanchez, Maria J.
    Sanchez, Maria D.
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR WIRTSCHAFTSGEOGRAPHIE, 2021, 65 (3-4): : 118 - 131
  • [8] Knowledge management practices within a collaborative R&D project Case study of a firm in a cluster of railway industry
    Zanzouri, Chokri
    Francois, Jean-Charles
    [J]. BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 19 (05) : 819 - 840
  • [9] Research on Profit Distribution of Collaborative R&D in Mega Project
    Shi Qian-qian
    Zhu Jian-bo
    Sheng Zhao-han
    Liu Hui-min
    [J]. 2016 23RD ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, VOLS. I AND II, 2016, : 1444 - 1449
  • [10] Comparing Strategies of Collaborative Networks for R&D: An Agent-Based Study
    Campos, Pedro
    Brazdil, Pavel
    Mota, Isabel
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 42 (01) : 1 - 22