共 50 条
Impact of Peer Health Coaching on Glycemic Control in Low-Income Patients With Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
被引:222
|作者:
Thom, David H.
[1
]
Ghorob, Amireh
[1
]
Hessler, Danielle
[1
]
De Vore, Diana
[1
]
Chen, Ellen
[1
]
Bodenheimer, Thomas A.
[1
]
机构:
[1] San Francisco Gen Hosp, Dept Family & Community Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词:
peer coach;
diabetes mellitus type 2;
self care;
primary health care;
self-management support;
SELF-MANAGEMENT PROGRAM;
COST-EFFECTIVENESS;
AFRICAN-AMERICAN;
PROJECT DULCE;
SUPPORT;
CARE;
INTERVENTION;
EDUCATION;
D O I:
10.1370/afm.1443
中图分类号:
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号:
1004 ;
120402 ;
摘要:
PURPOSE Peer health coaches offer a potential model for extending the capacity of primary care practices to provide self-management support for patients with diabetes. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to test whether clinic-based peer health coaching, compared with usual care, improves glycemic control for low-income patients who have poorly controlled diabetes. METHOD We undertook a randomized controlled trial enrolling patients from 6 public health clinics in San Francisco. Twenty-three patients with a glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1C)) level of less than 8.5%, who completed a 36-hour health coach training class, acted as peer coaches. Patients from the same clinics with HbA(1C) levels of 8.0% or more were recruited and randomized to receive health coaching (n = 148) or usual care (n = 151). The primary outcome was the difference in change in HbA(1C) levels at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were proportion of patients with a decrease in HbA(1C) level of 1.0% or more and proportion of patients with an HbA(1C) level of less than 7.5% at 6 months. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed model with and without adjustment for differences in baseline variables. RESULTS At 6 months, HbA(1C) levels had decreased by 1.07% in the coached group and 0.3% in the usual care group, a difference of 0.77% in favor of coaching (P = .01, adjusted). HbA(1C) levels decreased 1.0% or more in 49.6% of coached patients vs 31.5% of usual care patients (P = .001, adjusted), and levels at 6 months were less than 7.5% for 22.0% of coached vs 14.9% of usual care patients (P = .04, adjusted). CONCLUSIONS Peer health coaching significantly improved diabetes control in this group of low-income primary care patients.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 144
页数:8
相关论文