Optimal Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Vaccinated Against Human Papillomavirus

被引:49
|
作者
Kim, Jane J. [1 ]
Burger, Emily A. [1 ,2 ]
Sy, Stephen [1 ]
Campos, Nicole G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Decis Sci, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Boston, MA USA
[2] Univ Oslo, Dept Hlth Management & Hlth Econ, Oslo, Norway
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; HPV VACCINE; UNITED-STATES; PREVALENCE; INFECTION; DURATION; EFFICACY; COLPOSCOPY; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djw216
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Current US cervical cancer screening guidelines do not differentiate recommendations based on a woman's human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination status. Changes to cervical cancer screening policies in HPV-vaccinated women should be evaluated. Methods: We utilized an individual-based mathematical model of HPV and cervical cancer in US women to project the health benefits, costs, and harms associated with screening strategies in women vaccinated with the bivalent, quadrivalent, or nonavalent vaccine. Strategies varied by the primary screening test, including cytology, HPV, and combined cytology and HPV "cotesting"; age of screening initiation and/or switching to a new test; and interval between routine screens. Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the societal perspective to identify screening strategies that would be considered good value for money according to thresholds of $50 000 to $200 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Results: Among women fully vaccinated with the bivalent or quadrivalent vaccine, optimal screening strategies involved either cytology or HPV testing alone every five years starting at age 25 or 30 years, with cost-effectiveness ratios ranging from $34 680 to $138 560 per QALY gained. Screening earlier or more frequently was either not cost-effective or associated with exceedingly high cost-effectiveness ratios. In women vaccinated with the nonavalent vaccine, only primary HPV testing was efficient, involving decreased frequency (ie, every 10 years) starting at either age 35 years ($40 210 per QALY) or age 30 years ($127 010 per QALY); with lower nonavalent vaccine efficacy, 10-year HPV testing starting at earlier ages of 25 or 30 years was optimal. Importantly, current US guidelines for screening were inefficient in HPV-vaccinated women. Conclusions: This model-based analysis suggests screening can be modified to start at later ages, occur at decreased frequency, and involve primary HPV testing in HPV-vaccinated women, providing more health benefit at lower harms and costs than current screening guidelines.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cervical, screening rates for women vaccinated against human papillomavirus
    Budd, Alison C.
    Brotherton, Julia M. L.
    Gertig, Dorota M.
    Chau, Theresa
    Drennan, Kelly T.
    Saville, Marion
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2014, 201 (05) : 279 - 282
  • [2] Cervical cancer screening in women vaccinated against human papillomavirus infection: Recommendations from a consensus conference
    Rossi, Paolo Giorgi
    Carozzi, Francesca
    Federici, Antonio
    Ronco, Guglielmo
    Zappa, Marco
    Franceschi, Silvia
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 98 : 21 - 30
  • [3] Adapting cervical cancer screening for women vaccinated against human papillomavirus infections: The value of stratifying guidelines
    Pedersen, Kine
    Burger, Emily A.
    Nygard, Mari
    Kristiansen, Ivar S.
    Kim, Jane J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 91 : 68 - 75
  • [4] Acceptability of deferring the start of cervical cancer screening to age 30 for women vaccinated against human papillomavirus
    Martello, Gessica
    Gori, Silvia
    Frayle, Helena
    Franceschi, Silvia
    Zorzi, Manuel
    Del Mistro, Annarosa
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2023, 36
  • [5] Human papillomavirus infections and cervical cancer screening in Tunisian women
    Bouguerra, H.
    Hechaichi, A.
    Letaief, H.
    Ardhaoui, M.
    Ennaiefer, E.
    Bougatef, S.
    Chahed, K.
    Mechala, M.
    Boubaker, S.
    Ben Alaya, N.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 29
  • [6] Awareness of cervical cancer and willingness to be vaccinated against human papillomavirus in Mozambican adolescent girls
    Bardaji, Azucena
    Mindu, Carolina
    Augusto, Orvalho J.
    Casellas, Aina
    Cambaco, Olga
    Simbine, Egas
    Matsinhe, Graca
    Macete, Eusebio
    Menendez, Clara
    Sevene, Esperanca
    Munguambe, Khatia
    [J]. PAPILLOMAVIRUS RESEARCH, 2018, 5 : 156 - 162
  • [7] Will vaccinated women attend cervical screening? A population based survey of human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical screening among young women in Victoria, Australia
    Brotherton, Julia M. L.
    Mullins, Robyn M.
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 36 (03) : 298 - 302
  • [8] REDUCED CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING FREQUENCY IN HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS VACCINATED, HIV-INFECTED WOMEN: A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    Cohen, Jamie
    Menzies, Nicolas A.
    Kim, Jane J.
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2020, 40 (01) : E85 - E85
  • [10] Human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening
    Franceschi, S
    Mahé, C
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 92 (09) : 1591 - 1592