Minimum end-tidal sevoflurane concentration necessary to prevent movement during a constant rate infusion of morphine, or morphine plus dexmedetomidine in ponies

被引:12
|
作者
Gozalo-Marcilla, Miguel [1 ]
Hopster, Klaus [2 ]
Gasthuys, Frank [1 ]
Krajewski, Anna Elisabeth [2 ]
Schwarz, Andrea [3 ]
Schauvliege, Stijn [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Surg & Anaesthesia Domest Anim, Fac Vet Med, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
[2] Univ Vet Med Hannover, Clin Horses, Hannover, Germany
[3] Univ Zurich, Vetsuisse Fac, Sect Anaesthesiol, Equine Dept, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
morphine; minimal alveolar concentration; ponies; sevoflurane; dexmedetomidine; constant-rate infusion; ALVEOLAR CONCENTRATION; CARDIOPULMONARY FUNCTION; PERIOPERATIVE MORPHINE; HALOTHANE; ISOFLURANE; HORSES; ANESTHESIA; RESPONSES; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1111/vaa.12090
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Objective To compare the effects of a constant rate infusion (CRI) of dexmedetomidine and morphine to those of morphine alone on the minimum end-tidal sevoflurane concentration necessary to prevent movement (MAC(NM)) in ponies. Study design Prospective, randomized, crossover, 'blinded', experimental study. Animals Five healthy adult gelding ponies were anaesthetized twice with a 3-week washout period. Methods After induction of anaesthesia with sevoflurane in oxygen (via nasotracheal tube), the ponies were positioned on a surgical table (T0), and anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (Fe ' SEVO 2.5%) in 55% oxygen. Monitoring included pulse oximetry, electrocardiography and measurement of anaesthetic gases, arterial blood pressure and body temperature. The ponies were mechanically ventilated and randomly allocated to receive IV treatment M [morphine 0.15mgkg(-1) (T10-T15) followed by a CRI (0.1mgkg(-1)hour(-1))] or treatment DM [dexmedetomidine 3.5 mu gkg(-1) plus morphine 0.15mgkg(-1) (T10-T15) followed by a CRI of dexmedetomidine 1.75 mu gkg(-1)hour(-1) and morphine 0.1mgkg(-1)hour(-1)]. At T60, a stepwise MAC(NM) determination was initiated using constant current electrical stimuli at the skin of the lateral pastern region. Triplicate MAC(NM) estimations were obtained and then averaged in each pony. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to detect differences in MAC between treatments (alpha=0.05). Results Sevoflurane-morphine MAC(NM) values (median (range) and mean +/- SD) were 2.56 (2.01-4.07) and 2.79 +/- 0.73%. The addition of a continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine significantly reduced sevoflurane MAC(NM) values to 0.89 (0.62-1.05) and 0.89 +/- 0.22% (mean MAC(NM) reduction 67 +/- 11%). Conclusion and clinical relevance Co-administration of dexmedetomidine and morphine CRIs significantly reduced the MAC(NM) of sevoflurane compared with a CRI of morphine alone at the reported doses.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 219
页数:8
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Effects of a constant-rate infusion of dexmedetomidine on the minimal alveolar concentration of sevoflurane in ponies
    Gozalo-Marcilla, M.
    Hopster, K.
    Gasthuys, F.
    Hatz, L.
    Krajewski, A. E.
    Schauvliege, S.
    [J]. EQUINE VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2013, 45 (02) : 204 - 208
  • [2] The effect of fentanyl on the end-tidal sevoflurane concentration needed to prevent motor movement in dogs
    Reilly, Sabrina
    Seddighi, Reza
    Egger, Christine M.
    Rohrbach, Barton W.
    Doherty, Thomas J.
    Qu, Wen
    Johnson, James R.
    [J]. VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2013, 40 (03) : 290 - 296
  • [3] Effect of dexmedetomidine, morphine-lidocaine-ketamine, and dexmedetomidine-morphine-lidocaine-ketamine constant rate infusions on the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane and bispectral index in dogs
    Ebner, Lisa Sams
    Lerche, Phillip
    Bednarski, Richard M.
    Hubbell, John A. E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2013, 74 (07) : 963 - 970
  • [4] Reduction of the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane in dogs using a constant rate of infusion of lidocaine-ketamine in combination with either morphine or fentanyl
    Aguado, Delia
    Benito, Javier
    Gomez de Segura, Ignacio A.
    [J]. VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2011, 189 (01): : 63 - 66