Survey topic and unit nonresponse Evidence from an online survey on mating

被引:20
|
作者
Zillmann, Doreen [1 ]
Schmitz, Andreas [1 ]
Skopek, Jan [1 ]
Blossfeld, Hans-Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] Otto Friedrich Univ Bamberg, D-96047 Bamberg, Germany
[2] European Univ Inst, Florence, Italy
关键词
Topic interest; Unit nonresponse; Online survey; Web-generated process data; Online dating; Success bias; DECEPTIVE SELF-PRESENTATION; LEVERAGE-SALIENCY THEORY; SURVEY PARTICIPATION; RESPONSE RATES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11135-013-9880-y
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Survey topic as a factor influencing participation rates is becoming increasingly important, as there is a growing trend in social science research for surveying specific populations about specific topics. Previous research has shown that respondents with high topic interest (often referred to as salience) are more likely to participate in surveys. However, the identification of mechanisms that affect respondents' interest in a survey topic has been largely neglected in research literature. We present an explanatory model of participation that conceptualizes topic interest as a function of an actor's relational position in a particular social setting. To illustrate the relationship between survey topic and participation behavior, we use an online survey on mating conducted on the user population of an online dating site. For our nonresponse analysis we use web-generated process data, consisting of profile and interaction data, which describe all units of the sample frame. Thus, comprehensive information is available for both participants and non-participants of the online survey on an individual level, enabling a particularly accurate analysis of nonresponse. Results show that the probability of participation varies according to a user's chances of success on the mating market. Users who can be described as less attractive (e.g. older people, less educated men, overweight women) show a higher probability of participation, which we explain with the mechanism of topic salience. We conclude with general implications regarding (1) the relationship between survey topic and survey participation and (2) the potential of web-generated process data for (online) survey research.
引用
收藏
页码:2069 / 2088
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Survey topic and unit nonresponseEvidence from an online survey on mating
    Doreen Zillmann
    Andreas Schmitz
    Jan Skopek
    Hans-Peter Blossfeld
    [J]. Quality & Quantity, 2014, 48 : 2069 - 2088
  • [2] DO TOPIC DIFFERENCES AFFECT SURVEY NONRESPONSE
    MCDANIEL, SW
    VERILLE, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MARKET RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1987, 29 (01): : 55 - 66
  • [3] Patterns of unit and item nonresponse in the CAHPS® Hospital Survey
    Elliott, MN
    Edwards, C
    Angeles, J
    Hambarsoomians, K
    Hays, RD
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2005, 40 (06) : 2096 - 2119
  • [4] Targeting Key Survey Variables at the Unit Nonresponse Treatment Stage
    Haziza, David
    Chen, Sixia
    Gao, Yimeng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURVEY STATISTICS AND METHODOLOGY, 2022, 10 (01) : 25 - 49
  • [5] "Optimal" calibration weights under unit nonresponse in survey sampling
    Andersson, Per Gosta
    [J]. SURVEY METHODOLOGY, 2019, 45 (03) : 533 - 542
  • [6] The dilemma of survey nonresponse
    Burkell, J
    [J]. LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2003, 25 (03) : 239 - 263
  • [7] ORGANIZATIONAL SURVEY NONRESPONSE
    TOMASKOVICDEVEY, D
    LEITER, J
    THOMPSON, S
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1994, 39 (03) : 439 - 457
  • [8] Consequences of Survey Nonresponse
    Peytchev, Andy
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2013, 645 (01): : 88 - 111
  • [9] The Impact of Active Consent Procedures on Nonresponse and Nonresponse Error in Youth Survey Data Evidence From a New Experiment
    Courser, Matthew W.
    Shamblen, Stephen R.
    Lavrakas, Paul J.
    Collins, David
    Ditterline, Paul
    [J]. EVALUATION REVIEW, 2009, 33 (04) : 370 - 395
  • [10] Patient Characteristics of Provider Survey Respondents: No Evidence of Nonresponse Bias
    Ziegenfuss, Jeanette Y.
    Shah, Nilay D.
    Fan, Jiaquan
    Van Houten, Holly K.
    Deming, James R.
    Smith, Steven A.
    Beebe, Timothy J.
    [J]. EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2012, 35 (04) : 507 - 516