Role of diuretics in the prevention of heart failure - The antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial

被引:90
|
作者
Davis, BR
Piller, LB
Cutler, JA
Furberg, C
Dunn, K
Franklin, S
Goff, D
Leenen, F
Mohiuddin, S
Papademetriou, V
Proschan, M
Ellsworth, A
Golden, J
Colon, P
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Sch Publ Hlth, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] NHLBI, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
[4] Univ Ottawa, Inst Heart, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA USA
[6] Creighton Cardiac Ctr, Omaha, NE USA
[7] Ctr Cardiovasc Caguas, Caguas, PR USA
[8] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Washington, DC 20422 USA
[9] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[10] Penderbrook Med Ctr, Fairfax, VA USA
[11] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
heart failure; diuretics; hypertension;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.544031
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background - Hypertension is a major cause of heart failure (HF) and is antecedent in 91% of cases. The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) stipulated assessment of the relative effect of chlorthalidone, lisinopril, and amlodipine in preventing HF. Methods and Results - ALLHAT was a double-blind, randomized, clinical trial in 33 357 high-risk hypertensive patients aged >= 55 years. Hospitalized/fatal HF outcomes were examined with proportional-hazards models. Relative risks (95% confidence intervals; P values) of amlodipine or lisinopril versus chlorthalidone were 1.35 (1.21 to 1.50; < 0.001) and 1.11 (0.99 to 1.24; 0.09). The proportional hazards assumption of constant relative risk over time was not valid. A more appropriate model showed relative risks of amlodipine or lisinopril versus chlorthalidone during year 1 were 2.22 ( 1.69 to 2.91; < 0.001) and 2.08 (1.58 to 2.74; < 0.001), and after year 1, 1.22 (1.08 to 1.38; P = 0.001) and 0.96 (0.85 to 1.10; 0.58). There was no significant interaction between prior medication use and treatment. Baseline blood pressures were equivalent (146/84 mm Hg) and at year 1 were 137/79, 139/79, and 140/80 mm Hg in those given chlorthalidone, amlodipine, and lisinopril. At 1 year, use of added open-label atenolol, diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and calcium channel blockers in the treatment groups was similar. Conclusions - HF risk decreased with chlorthalidone versus amlodipine or lisinopril use during year 1. Subsequently, risk for those individuals taking chlorthalidone versus amlodipine remained decreased but less so, whereas it was equivalent to those given lisinopril. Prior medication use, follow-up blood pressures, and concomitant medications are unlikely to explain most of the HF differences. Diuretics are superior to calcium channel blockers and, at least in the short term, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in preventing HF in hypertensive individuals.
引用
收藏
页码:2201 / 2210
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条