Ethnicity and impact on the receipt of cognitive-behavioural therapy in people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: an English cohort study

被引:16
|
作者
Morris, Rohan Michael [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sellwood, William [1 ]
Edge, Dawn [4 ]
Colling, Craig [5 ,6 ]
Stewart, Robert [5 ,6 ]
Cupitt, Caroline [6 ]
Das-Munshi, Jayati [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Div Hlth Res, Lancaster, England
[2] Lancashire Care NHS Fdn Trust, Preston, Lancs, England
[3] Pennine Care NHS Fdn Trust, Manchester, England
[4] Univ Manchester, Sch Hlth Sci, Div Psychol & Mental Hlth, Manchester, Lancs, England
[5] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, London, England
[6] South London & Maudsley NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[7] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat, Sect Epidemiol, Dept Hlth Serv & Populat Res, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 12期
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
schizophrenia & psychotic disorders; depression & mood disorders; mental health; adult psychiatry; SEVERE MENTAL-ILLNESS; SELF-HARM; EXPERIENCE; DETENTION; WHITES; BLACK;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034913
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives (1) To explore the role of ethnicity in receiving cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) for people with psychosis or bipolar disorder while adjusting for differences in risk profiles and symptom severity. (2) To assess whether context of treatment (inpatient vs community) impacts on the relationship between ethnicity and access to CBT. Design Cohort study of case register data from one catchment area (January 2007-July 2017). Setting A large secondary care provider serving an ethnically diverse population in London. Participants Data extracted for 30 497 records of people who had diagnoses of bipolar disorder (International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code F30-1) or psychosis (F20-F29 excluding F21). Exclusion criteria were: <15 years old, missing data and not self-defining as belonging to one of the larger ethnic groups. The sample (n=20 010) comprised the following ethnic groups: white British: n=10 393; Black Caribbean: n=5481; Black African: n=2817; Irish: n=570; and 'South Asian' people (consisting of Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi people): n=749. Outcome assessments ORs for receipt of CBT (single session or full course) as determined via multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results In models adjusted for risk and severity variables, in comparison with White British people; Black African people were less likely to receive a single session of CBT (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.82, p<0.001); Black Caribbean people were less likely to receive a minimum of 16-sessions of CBT (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.98, p=0.03); Black African and Black Caribbean people were significantly less likely to receive CBT while inpatients (respectively, OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.89, p=0.001; OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.94, p=0.003). Conclusions This study highlights disparity in receipt of CBT from a large provider of secondary care in London for Black African and Caribbean people and that the context of therapy (inpatient vs community settings) has a relationship with disparity in access to treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条