Why do physicians vary so widely in their referral rates?

被引:142
|
作者
Franks, P [1 ]
Williams, GC [1 ]
Zwanziger, J [1 ]
Mooney, C [1 ]
Sorbero, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Dept Family Med, Primary Care Inst, Rochester, NY 14620 USA
关键词
primary health care; physician's practice patterns; referral and consultation;
D O I
10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.04079.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To determine which physician practice and psychological factors contribute to observed variation in primary care physicians' referral rates. DESIGN: Cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey and analysis of claims database. SETTING:A large managed care organization in the Rochester, NY, metropolitan area. PARTICIPANTS: Internists and family physicians. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patient referral status (referred or not) was derived from the 1995 claims database of the managed care organization. The claims data were also used to generate a predicted risk of referral based on patient age, gender, and case mix. A physician survey completed by a sample of 182 of the physicians (66% of those eligible) included items on their practice and validated psychological scales on anxiety from uncertainty, risk aversiveness, fear of malpractice, satisfaction with practice, autonomous and controlled motivation for referrals and test ordering, and psychosocial beliefs. The relation between the risk of referral and the physician practice and psychological factors was examined using logistic regression. After adjustment for predicted risk of referral (case mix), patients were more likely to be referred if their physician was female, had more years in practice, was an internist, and used a narrower range of diagnoses (a higher Herfindahl index, also derived from the claims data). Of the psychological factors, only greater psychosocial orientation and malpractice fear was associated with greater likelihood of referral. When the physician practice factors were excluded from the analysis, risk aversion was positively associated with referral likelihood. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the explainable variation In referral likelihood was accounted for by patient and physician practice factors like case mix, physician gender, years in practice, specialty, and the Herfindahl index. Relatively Little variation was explained by any of the examined physician psychological factors.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 168
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Why do physicians vary so widely in their referral rates?
    Peter Franks
    Geoffrey C. Williams
    Jack Zwanziger
    Cathleen Mooney
    Melony Sorbero
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2000, 15 : 163 - 168
  • [2] Pesticide application rates and their toxicological impacts: why do they vary so widely across the US?
    Tao, Mengya
    Adler, Paul R.
    Larsen, Ashley E.
    Suh, Sangwon
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (12)
  • [3] HLW DISPOSAL COSTS - WHY DO ESTIMATES VARY SO WIDELY
    WARD, D
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 39 (475): : 26 - 27
  • [4] Why do PBDE levels vary widely?
    Betts, K
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 37 (09) : 164A - 165A
  • [5] Referral Rates Vary Widely Between Family Medicine Practices
    El Ayadi, Hamza
    Desai, Alpa
    Jones, Ross E.
    Mercado, Elvira
    Williams, Maribeth
    Rooks, Benjamin
    Carek, Peter J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2021, 34 (06) : 1183 - 1188
  • [6] Why do discount rates vary?
    Kozak, Serhiy
    Santosh, Shrihari
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 137 (03) : 740 - 751
  • [7] Why do hospital death rates vary?
    Halm, EA
    Chassin, MR
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (09): : 692 - 694
  • [8] INCIDENCE OF DO-NOT-RESUSCITATE ORDERS - WHY DO RATES VARY
    SINGER, PA
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1990, 38 (02): : A742 - A742
  • [9] New Report Asks Why Pediatric Hospital Readmission Rates Vary Widely
    McBride, Deborah L.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NURSING-NURSING CARE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, 2013, 28 (03): : 300 - 301
  • [10] CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION - WHY DO RATES VARY GEOGRAPHICALLY IN THE UK
    BLACK, N
    LANGHAM, S
    PETTICREW, M
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1995, 49 (04) : 408 - 412