Ongoing quality control in digital radiography: Report of AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 151

被引:54
|
作者
Jones, A. Kyle [1 ]
Heintz, Philip [2 ]
Geiser, William [1 ]
Goldman, Lee [3 ]
Jerjian, Khachig [4 ]
Martin, Melissa [5 ]
Peck, Donald [6 ]
Pfeiffer, Douglas [7 ]
Ranger, Nicole [8 ]
Yorkston, John [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Imaging Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ New Mexico, Dept Radiol, Albuquerque, NM 87104 USA
[3] Hartford Hosp, Hartford, CT 06102 USA
[4] Hoag Mem Hosp, Newport Beach, CA 92658 USA
[5] Therapy Phys Inc, Gardena, CA 90248 USA
[6] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[7] Boulder Community Foothills Hosp, Boulder, CO 80303 USA
[8] Landauer Inc, Glenwood, IL 60425 USA
[9] Carestream Hlth Inc, Rochester, NY 14615 USA
关键词
quality control; digital radiography; repeat analysis; exposure analysis; X-RAY EXAMINATIONS; COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY; REJECT ANALYSIS; ATTENUATION PHANTOM; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; RADIOLOGY; PATIENT; HOSPITALS; DICOM; DEPARTMENTS;
D O I
10.1118/1.4932623
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Quality control (QC) in medical imaging is an ongoing process and not just a series of infrequent evaluations of medical imaging equipment. The QC process involves designing and implementing a QC program, collecting and analyzing data, investigating results that are outside the acceptance levels for the QC program, and taking corrective action to bring these results back to an acceptable level. The QC process involves key personnel in the imaging department, including the radiologist, radiologic technologist, and the qualified medical physicist (QMP). The QMP performs detailed equipment evaluations and helps with oversight of the QC program, the radiologic technologist is responsible for the day-to-day operation of the QC program. The continued need for ongoing QC in digital radiography has been highlighted in the scientific literature. The charge of this task group was to recommend consistency tests designed to be performed by a medical physicist or a radiologic technologist under the direction of a medical physicist to identify problems with an imaging system that need further evaluation by a medical physicist, including a fault tree to define actions that need to be taken when certain fault conditions are identified. The focus of this final report is the ongoing QC process, including rejected image analysis, exposure analysis, and artifact identification. These QC tasks are vital for the optimal operation of a department performing digital radiography. (C) 2015 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:6658 / 6670
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Current state of practice regarding digital radiography exposure indicators and deviation indices: Report of AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 232
    Dave, Jaydev K.
    Jones, A. Kyle
    Fisher, Ryan
    Hulme, Katie
    Rill, Lynn
    Zamora, David
    Woodward, Andrew
    Brady, Samuel
    MacDougall, Robert D.
    Goldman, Lee
    Lang, Susan
    Peck, Donald
    Apgar, Bruce
    Shepard, S. Jeff
    Uzenoff, Robert
    Willis, Charles
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (11) : E1146 - E1160
  • [3] Eye Plaque Dosimetry: Report of the AAPM Therapy Physics Committee Task Group No. 129
    Mourtada, F.
    Chiu-Tsao, S.
    Astrahan, M.
    Finger, P.
    Followill, D.
    Meigooni, A.
    Melhus, C.
    Napolitano, M.
    Thomson, R.
    Rivard, M.
    Parish, M.
    Rogers, D.
    Nath, R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06)
  • [4] Intravascular brachytherapy physics: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 60
    Nath, R
    Amols, H
    Coffey, C
    Duggan, D
    Jani, S
    Li, ZF
    Schell, M
    Soares, C
    Whiting, J
    Cole, PE
    Crocker, I
    Schwartz, R
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (02) : 119 - 152
  • [5] Accuracy and calibration of integrated radiation output indicators in diagnostic radiology: A report of the AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 190
    Lin, Pei-Jan P.
    Schueler, Beth A.
    Balter, Stephen
    Strauss, Keith J.
    Wunderle, Kevin A.
    LaFrance, M. Terry
    Kim, Don-Soo
    Behrman, Richard H.
    Shepard, S. Jeff
    Bercha, Ishtiaq H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (12) : 6815 - 6829
  • [6] AAPM Task Group Report 306: Quality control and assurance for tomotherapy: An update to Task Group Report 148
    Chen, Quan
    Rong, Yi
    Burmeister, Jay W. W.
    Chao, Edward H. H.
    Corradini, Nathan A. A.
    Followill, David S. S.
    Li, X. Allen
    Liu, An
    Qi, X. Sharon
    Shi, Hairong
    Smilowitz, Jennifer B. B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (03) : E25 - E52
  • [7] Code of practice for brachytherapy physics: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 56
    Nath, R
    Anderson, LL
    Meli, JA
    Olch, AJ
    Stitt, JA
    Williamson, JF
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (10) : 1557 - 1598
  • [8] An exposure indicator for digital radiography: AAPM Task Group 116 (Executive Summary)
    Shepard, S. Jeff
    Wang, Jihong
    Flynn, Michael
    Gingold, Eric
    Goldman, Lee
    Krugh, Kerry
    Leong, David L.
    Mah, Eugene
    Ogden, Kent
    Peck, Donald
    Samei, Ehsan
    Willis, Charles E.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (07) : 2898 - 2914
  • [9] Clinical use of electronic portal imaging: Report of AAPM radiation therapy committee Task Group 58
    Herman, MG
    Balter, JM
    Jaffray, DA
    McGee, KP
    Munro, P
    Shalev, S
    Van Herk, M
    Wong, JW
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (05) : 712 - 737
  • [10] AAPM/RNSA basic physics lecture for the radiologic technologist: Basic physics of digital imaging and computed radiography
    Weiser, JC
    Tucker, D
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 17 - 17