Ground-penetrating radar imaging of carbonate mound structures and implications for interpretation of marine seismic data

被引:11
|
作者
Nielsen, L [1 ]
Boldreel, LO [1 ]
Surlyk, F [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Inst Geol, DK-1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1306/02230403070
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Images of carbonate mound structures in Denmark and Sweden are obtained from ground-penetrating radar (GPR) reflections and outcrop analysis. The GPR data are collected in limestone quarries and provide a depth penetration of about 10 m (3 3 ft) and a vertical resolution of about 0.5 m (1.6 ft). The mounds are part of the northwest European Upper Cretaceous - Danian (Lower Paleocene) Chalk Group, and they are similar to each other in terms of architecture, spatial distribution, and size, with widths and lengths of 30-60 m (100-200 ft) and heights of 5-10 m (16-33 ft). Seismic reflection images from the sea of Kattegat between Sweden and Denmark and the North Sea show large (similar to500-1000-m [similar to1640-3280-ft]-wide and similar to50-100-m [similar to160-330-ft]-high) moundlike carbonate structures. Interpretations of such large mounds conflict with the GPR and outcrop observations. We address these conflicting observations. We construct realistic reference models of carbonate mound complex geometries based on the results of the GPR measurements and outcrop analysis and calculate synthetic seismic sections for the models. The modeling results show that the size of individual mounds is below the seismic resolution of 10-25 m (33-82 ft), and that interference effects caused by stacks of mounds may explain the observed large moundlike structures. Our findings are important for the interpretation of seismic images of carbonate mound structures. Carbonate mound buildups may form traps, and correct seismic interpretation of mound complex geometry may be essential for evaluation of the nature and reservoir potential of such structures.
引用
收藏
页码:1069 / 1082
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A method for interpretation of ground-penetrating radar data
    Yufryakov, BA
    Surikov, BS
    Sosulin, YG
    Linnikov, ON
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY AND ELECTRONICS, 2004, 49 (12) : 1342 - 1356
  • [2] Diffraction imaging of ground-penetrating radar data
    Yuan, Hemin
    Montazeri, Mahboubeh
    Looms, Majken C.
    Nielsen, Lars
    GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 84 (03) : H1 - H12
  • [3] Seismic reflection and ground-penetrating radar imaging of a shallow aquifer
    Cardimona, SJ
    Clement, WP
    Kadinsky-Cade, K
    GEOPHYSICS, 1998, 63 (04) : 1310 - 1317
  • [4] Ground-Penetrating Radar for Inspection of In-Road Structures and Data Interpretation by Numerical Modeling
    Solla, Mercedes
    Gonzalez-Jorge, Higinio
    Varela, Maria
    Lorenzo, Henrique
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2013, 139 (06): : 749 - 753
  • [5] Interpretation pitfalls to avoid in void interpretation from ground-penetrating radar imaging
    Nobes, David C.
    INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION, 2018, 6 (04): : SL21 - SL28
  • [6] Remigration of ground-penetrating radar data
    Jaya, MS
    Botelho, MA
    Hubral, P
    Liebhardt, G
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 1999, 41 (01) : 19 - 30
  • [7] Imaging periglacial conditions with ground-penetrating radar
    Moorman, BJ
    Robinson, SD
    Burgess, MM
    PERMAFROST AND PERIGLACIAL PROCESSES, 2003, 14 (04) : 319 - 329
  • [8] Application of deterministic deconvolution of ground-penetrating radar data in a study of carbonate strata
    Xia, JH
    Franseen, EK
    Miller, RD
    Weis, TV
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2004, 56 (03) : 213 - 229
  • [9] The challenges of signal interpretation of burials in ground-penetrating radar
    Martindale, Andrew
    Wadsworth, William T. D.
    Simons, Eric
    Whiting, Brian
    Grier, Colin
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROSPECTION, 2023,
  • [10] Three-dimensional imaging of multicomponent ground-penetrating radar data
    van der Kruk, J
    Wapenaar, CPA
    Fokkema, JT
    van den Berg, PM
    GEOPHYSICS, 2003, 68 (04) : 1241 - 1254