Efficacy of Contact Lens Care Solutions in Removing Cholesterol Deposits From Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses

被引:7
|
作者
Walther, Hendrik [1 ]
Subbaraman, Lakshman N. [1 ]
Jones, Lyndon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Sch Optometry & Vis Sci, CORE, Waterloo, ON, Canada
来源
关键词
Lipid deposition; Silicone hydrogel; Contact lenses; Cholesterol; Cleaning; Multipurpose solution; TEAR FILM COMPONENTS; IN-VITRO; PROTEIN DEPOSITION; LIPID DEPOSITION; LYSOZYME DEPOSITION; BACTERIAL ADHESION; IMPACT; QUANTIFICATION; SURFACE; RUB;
D O I
10.1097/ICL.0000000000000547
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the efficacy of multipurpose solutions (MPSs) on the removal of cholesterol deposits from silicone hydrogel (SH) contact lens materials using an in vitro model. Materials and Methods: Five SH lens materials: senofilcon A, comfilcon A, balafilcon A, lotrafilcon A, and lotrafilcon B were removed from the blister pack (n=4 for each lens type), incubated for 7 days at 37 degrees C in an artificial tear solution containing C-14 radiolabeled cholesterol. Thereafter, lenses were stored in a preserved saline solution control (Sensitive Eyes Saline Plus) or cleaned with 1 of the 5 MPSs incorporating different preservatives (POLYQUAD/ALDOX, polyquaternium-1/alexidine, polyquaternium-1/PHMB, and 2 based on PHMB alone) using a rub and rinse technique, according to the manufacturer's recommendations, and stored in the MPS for a minimum of 6 hr. Lenses were then extracted with 2:1 chloroform: methanol, analyzed in a beta counter, and mu g/lens of cholesterol was determined. Results: Balafilcon A and senofilcon A lens materials showed the highest amounts of accumulated cholesterol (0.93 +/- 0.02 mu g/lens; 0.95 +/- 0.01 mu g/lens, respectively), whereas lotrafilcon A and lotrafilcon B deposited the lowest amounts (0.37 +/- 0.03 mu g/lens; 0.47 +/- 0.12 mu g/lens, respectively). For all lens materials, the MPS preserved with POLYQUAD/ALDOX removed more deposited cholesterol than any other test solution; however, the amount of removed cholesterol contamination from the individual contact lenses was only statistically significant for balafilcon A and senofilcon A (P=0.006 and P=0.042, respectively). Sensitive eyes and the other evaluated MPSs showed no significant effect on cholesterol removal (P>0.05). Conclusion: Cholesterol-removal efficacy varies depending on the combination of lens material and solution. Only 1 MPS showed a statistically significant reduction of cholesterol deposit for only 2 of the 5 tested lens materials.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 111
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of multi-purpose solutions in removing cholesterol deposits from silicone hydrogel contact lenses
    Walther, Hendrik
    Subbaraman, Lakshman
    Jones, Lyndon
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (15)
  • [2] Effects of Multipurpose Contact Lens Care Solutions on the Adhesion of Acanthamoeba to Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses
    Uno, Toshihiko
    Ohashi, Yuichi
    Nomachi, Miya
    Imayasu, Masaki
    CORNEA, 2012, 31 (10) : 1170 - 1175
  • [3] The efficiency of contact lens care regimens on protein removal from hydrogel and silicone hydrogel lenses
    Luensmann, Doerte
    Heynen, Miriam
    Liu, Lina
    Sheardown, Heather
    Jones, Lyndon
    MOLECULAR VISION, 2010, 16 (10-11): : 79 - 92
  • [4] Uptake and Release Phenomena in Contact Lens Care by Silicone Hydrogel Lenses
    Jones, Lyndon
    Powell, Charles H.
    EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2013, 39 (01): : 29 - 36
  • [5] Contact Lens Lipid Spoliation of Hydrogel and Silicone Hydrogel Lenses
    Maissa, Cecile
    Guillon, Michel
    Cockshott, Nik
    Garofalo, Renee J.
    Lemp, Jessie M.
    Boclair, Joseph W.
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2014, 91 (09) : 1071 - 1083
  • [6] Enzymatic Quantification of Cholesterol and Cholesterol Esters from Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses
    Pucker, Andrew D.
    Thangavelu, Mirunalni
    Nichols, Jason J.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (06) : 2949 - 2954
  • [7] Compatibility of two new silicone hydrogel contact lenses with three soft contact lens multipurpose solutions
    Santodomingo-Rubido, Jacinto
    Barrado-Navascues, Eva
    Rubido-Crespo, Maria-Jose
    Sugimoto, Keiji
    Sawano, Tadashi
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2008, 28 (04) : 373 - 381
  • [8] Contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis with silicone hydrogel lenses
    Sorbara, L.
    Jones, L.
    Williams-Lyn, D.
    CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE, 2009, 32 (02): : 93 - 96
  • [9] Quantitation of cholesterol and phospholipid sorption on silicone hydrogel contact lenses
    Pitt, William G.
    Perez, Krystian X.
    Ngai Keung Tam
    Handly, Erika
    Chinn, Joseph A.
    Liu, Xiaojun Michael
    Maziarz, Edmond Peter
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B-APPLIED BIOMATERIALS, 2013, 101 (08) : 1516 - 1523
  • [10] Are Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses More Comfortable Than Hydrogel Contact Lenses?
    Guillon, Michel
    EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2013, 39 (01): : 86 - 92