Analysis of CO2 storage mechanisms at a CO2-EOR site, Cranfield, Mississippi

被引:7
|
作者
Hosseini, Seyyed Abolfazl [1 ]
Alfi, Masoud [2 ]
Nicot, Jean-Philippe [1 ]
Nunez-Lopez, Vanessa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Bur Econ Geol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX USA
来源
关键词
trapping mechanism; CO2; storage; Cranfield; enhanced oil recovery; TRAPPING MECHANISMS; INJECTION; DISSOLUTION;
D O I
10.1002/ghg.1754
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Carbon dioxide injected for enhanced oil recovery will partition into several phases in the target geological formation. The distribution into free or residually trapped oil, gas, and brine phases depends on many factors such as reservoir temperature and pressure, initial fluid saturations, brine salinity, and relative permeability parameters, and evolves through time including in the post-injection period, during which it will tend to stabilize. Our numerical simulations, based on Cranfield, MS CO2-EOR project data, demonstrate that these variations are significant and mostly dependent on the operator's selected field-development strategy: continuous gas (CO2) injection, water alternating gas (WAG) injection, water curtain injection, or combinations thereof. In summary, our work shows that the field development strategy selected by the operator has a major impact on the relative importance of the different trapping mechanisms and that WAG seems to be a promising operational approach to balance both CO2 storage and oil production. (c) 2018 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 482
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sensitivity Analysis of CO2 Storage Coefficient and CO2-EOR
    Liao Xinwei
    Chen Yanfang
    Zhao Hongjun
    Zhao Xiaoliang
    [J]. 2010 ASIA-PACIFIC POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APPEEC), 2010,
  • [2] Simulation Analysis of CO2-EOR Process and Feasibility of CO2 Storage during EOR
    Arnaut, Maja
    Vulin, Domagoj
    Jose Garcia Lamberg, Gabriela
    Jukic, Lucija
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (04)
  • [3] Probabilistic analysis of CO2 storage mechanisms in a CO2-EOR field using polynomial chaos expansion
    Jia, Wei
    McPherson, Brian J.
    Pan, Feng
    Xiao, Ting
    Bromhal, Grant
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2016, 51 : 218 - 229
  • [4] Integration of reservoir simulation, history matching, and 4D seismic for CO2-EOR and storage at Cranfield, Mississippi, USA
    Alfi, Masoud
    Hosseini, Seyyed A.
    [J]. FUEL, 2016, 175 : 116 - 128
  • [5] Gas source attribution techniques for assessing leakage at geologic CO2 storage sites: Evaluating a CO2 and CH4 soil gas anomaly at the Cranfield CO2-EOR site
    Anderson, Jacob S.
    Romanak, Katherine D.
    Yang, Changbing
    Lu, Jiemin
    Hovorka, Susan D.
    Young, Michael H.
    [J]. CHEMICAL GEOLOGY, 2017, 454 : 93 - 104
  • [6] CO2-EOR and storage design optimization
    Ettehadtavakkol, Amin
    Lake, Larry W.
    Bryant, Steven L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2014, 25 : 79 - 92
  • [7] Storage compliance in coupled CO2-EOR and storage
    Ettehad, Amin
    [J]. GREENHOUSE GASES-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 4 (01): : 66 - 80
  • [8] Uncertainty quantification for CO2 storage during intermittent CO2-EOR in oil reservoirs
    Rezk, Mohamed Gamal
    Ibrahim, Ahmed Farid
    Adebayo, Abdulrauf R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2023, 266
  • [9] Ship transport of CO2 - breaking the CO2-EOR deadlock
    Neele, Filip
    Haugen, Hans Aksel
    Skagestad, Ragnhild
    [J]. 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-12, 2014, 63 : 2638 - 2644
  • [10] Utilization of CO2 from emitters in Poland for CO2-EOR
    Mathisen, Anette
    Skagestad, Ragnhild
    [J]. 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-13, 2017, 114 : 6721 - 6729