Whole-Body Functional MRI and PET/MRI in Multiple Myeloma

被引:19
|
作者
Mule, Sebastien [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Reizine, Edouard [1 ,2 ]
Blanc-Durand, Paul [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Baranes, Laurence [1 ,2 ]
Zerbib, Pierre [1 ,2 ]
Burns, Robert [1 ,2 ]
Nouri, Refaat [1 ,2 ]
Itti, Emmanuel [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Luciani, Alain [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Henri Mondor Hosp, AP HP, SyMPTOm PET MRI Platform, F-94010 Creteil, France
[2] Henri Mondor Hosp, AP HP, Dept Med Imaging, F-94010 Creteil, France
[3] Univ Paris Est Creteil, F-94010 Creteil, France
[4] Henri Mondor Hosp, AP HP, Dept Nucl Med, F-94010 Creteil, France
关键词
multiple myeloma; MRI; functional imaging; PET; whole-body imaging; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; PLASMA-CELL DISORDERS; DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MRI; BONE-MARROW; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; SYMPTOMATIC PATIENTS; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; F-18-FDG PET/CT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.3390/cancers12113155
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recognized as the most sensitive imaging technique for the detection of bone marrow infiltration, and was therefore, recently included in the new diagnostic myeloma criteria, as proposed by the International Myeloma Working Group. The use of diffusion-weighted MRI further improved the performances of whole-body MRI in the setting of multiple myeloma, and its systematic implementation in general clinical practice is now recommended. Whole-body, dynamic, contrast-enhanced MRI might provide further information on lesions vascularity and might help evaluate response to treatment. Hybrid PET/MRI might act as the optimal imaging modality, owing to the association of the best techniques for both detecting bone marrow involvement and evaluating treatment response, providing one-stop-shop imaging in a whole-body scale. This review provides an overview on the value of whole-body MRI, including diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and whole-body F-18-FDG PET/MRI in diagnosis, staging, and response evaluation in multiple myeloma. Bone disease is one of the major features of multiple myeloma (MM), and imaging has a pivotal role in both diagnosis and follow-up. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recognized as the gold standard for the detection of bone marrow involvement, owing to its high sensitivity. The use of functional MRI sequences further improved the performances of whole-body MRI in the setting of MM. Whole-body diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI is the most attractive functional technique and its systematic implementation in general clinical practice is now recommended by the International Myeloma Working Group. Whole-body dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI might provide further information on lesions vascularity and help evaluate response to treatment. Whole Body PET/MRI is an emerging hybrid imaging technique that offers the opportunity to combine information on morphology, fat content of bone marrow, bone marrow cellularity and vascularization, and metabolic activity. Whole-body PET/MRI allows a one-stop-shop examination, including the most sensitive technique for detecting bone marrow involvement, and the most recognized technique for treatment response evaluation. This review aims at providing an overview on the value of whole-body MRI, including DW and DCE MRI, and combined whole-body F-18-FDG PET/MRI in diagnosis, staging, and response evaluation in patients with MM.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The use of whole-body MRI in multiple myeloma
    Portet, Mark
    Owens, Emma
    Howlett, David
    [J]. CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 19 (04) : 355 - 356
  • [2] Whole-Body MRI Versus PET in Assessment of Multiple Myeloma Disease Activity
    Shortt, Conor P.
    Gleeson, Tadhg G.
    Breen, Karen A.
    McHugh, John
    O'Connell, Martin J.
    O'Gorman, Peter J.
    Eustace, Stephen J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 192 (04) : 980 - 986
  • [3] Whole-body MRI versus whole-body MDCT for staging of multiple myeloma
    Baur-Melnyk, Andrea
    Buhmann, Sonja
    Becker, Christoph
    Schoenberg, Stefan Oswald
    Lang, Nicola
    Bartl, Reiner
    Reiser, Maximilian Ferdinand
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 190 (04) : 1097 - 1104
  • [4] Whole-Body MRI in Multiple Myeloma: The Details Make the Picture
    Dragan, Alina D.
    Messiou, Christina
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2023, 308 (03)
  • [5] Whole body PET/MRI in multiple myeloma: An initial experience
    Fardanesh, Reza
    Tanenbaum, Lawrence
    Mesguich, Charles
    Sen, Urmi
    Chari, Ajai
    Jagannath, Sundar
    Kostakoglu, Lale
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 55
  • [6] Whole-body imaging with PET/MRI
    Gaa, J
    Rummeny, EJ
    Seemann, MD
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2004, 9 (06) : 309 - 312
  • [7] Evaluation of Whole-Body MRI (WB-MRI) in Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (SMM)
    Hill, Elizabeth
    Turkbey, Baris
    Turkbey, Evrim
    Morrison, Candis
    Choyke, Peter
    Mena, Esther
    Lindenberg, Liza
    Kazandjian, Dickran
    [J]. BLOOD, 2020, 136
  • [8] Development of a Semiquantitative Whole-Body MRI Scoring System for Multiple Myeloma
    Kim, Dong Kyun
    Jung, Joon-Yong
    Kim, Hyeonseon
    Lee, Sungwon
    Lee, So-Yeon
    Lee, Seungeun
    Park, Sung-Soo
    Min, Chang-Ki
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2023, 308 (03)
  • [9] Whole Body MRI and FDG PET in Myeloma
    Lindenberg, Liza
    Mena, Esther
    Ton, Anita
    Turkbey, Baris
    Hill, Elizabeth
    Eclarinal, Philip
    Daar, Dagane
    Tieu, Hoa
    Leyson, Christopher
    Cedo, Mona Lisa
    Weaver, Juanita
    McKinney, Yolanda
    Dew, Alexander
    Braylan, Raul
    Wang, Hao-Wei
    Yuan, Constance
    Maric, Irina
    Stetler-Stevenson, Maryalice
    Calvo, Katherine
    Dulau-Florea, Alina
    Choyke, Peter
    Kazandjian, Dickran
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 61
  • [10] Whole-body MRI of multiple myeloma: Comparison of different MRI sequences in assessment of different growth patterns
    Weininger, Markus
    Lauterbach, Brigitte
    Knop, Stefan
    Pabst, Thomas
    Kenn, Werner
    Hahn, Dietbert
    Beissert, Matthias
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 69 (02) : 339 - 345