Chicken or Egg? A Bi-directional Analysis of Social Protection and Social Cohesion in Burundi and Haiti

被引:2
|
作者
Roelen, Keetie [1 ]
Leon-Himmelstine, Carmen [2 ]
Kim, Sung Kyu [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Inst Dev Studies, Brighton BN1 9RE, E Sussex, England
[2] ODI, 203 Blackfriars Rd, London SE1 8NJ, England
[3] Univ Sussex Business Sch, Sci Policy Res Unit, Brighton BN1 9SL, E Sussex, England
来源
关键词
Social protection; Social cohesion; Community; Haiti; Burundi; CASH TRANSFERS; PROGRAMS; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1057/s41287-022-00524-2
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
A limited but growing number of studies point to mixed effects of social protection on social cohesion. Relatively little is known about the role of social cohesion on access to and impact of social protection. Based on in-depth qualitative research in Burundi and Haiti, this paper explores the bi-directional relationship between social protection and social cohesion. The analysis focuses on horizontal forms of social cohesion within a particular set of comprehensive interventions that provide bundled packages of support to the poorest and most vulnerable. We find that programmes strengthened attributes of social cohesion, such as dignity and positive identity. They also hampered elements of cohesion such as sense of belonging and togetherness. Stronger cohesion, mediated through community trust and collaboration, fostered positive programme impacts. The paper concludes that social dynamics at community, family and individual levels should receive greater attention in design and implementation of social protection to avoid unintended consequences and maximise programme impact across social and other dimensions.
引用
收藏
页码:1216 / 1239
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Chicken or Egg? A Bi-directional Analysis of Social Protection and Social Cohesion in Burundi and Haiti
    Keetie Roelen
    Carmen Leon-Himmelstine
    Sung Kyu Kim
    [J]. The European Journal of Development Research, 2022, 34 : 1216 - 1239
  • [2] Correction to: Chicken or Egg? A Bi-directional Analysis of Social Protection and Social Cohesion in Burundi and Haiti
    Keetie Roelen
    Carmen Leon‑Himmelstine
    Sung Kyu Kim
    [J]. The European Journal of Development Research, 2022, 34 : 2136 - 2136
  • [3] Chicken or Egg? A Bi-directional Analysis of Social Protection and Social Cohesion in Burundi and Haiti (Apr, 10.1057/s41287-022-00524-2, 2022)
    Roelen, Keetie
    Leon-Himmelstine, Carmen
    Kim, Sung Kyu
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH, 2022, 34 (04): : 2136 - 2136
  • [4] Bi-directional emotional contagion: An analysis of chinese parents' social media data
    Luo, Wenwei
    Berson, Ilene R.
    Berson, Michael J.
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION OPEN, 2022, 3
  • [5] Bi-directional emotional contagion: An analysis of chinese parents? social media data
    Luo, Wenwei
    Berson, Ilene R.
    Berson, Michael J.
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION OPEN, 2022, 3
  • [6] Bi-directional Exchange: the Cornerstone of Globally Focused Social Work
    Parker G.
    Ali S.
    Ringell K.
    McKay M.
    [J]. Global Social Welfare, 2014, 1 (1) : 1 - 8
  • [7] Environmental protection and performance: A bi-directional assessment
    Yang, Qi-Cheng
    Feng, Gen-Fu
    Chang, Chun-Ping
    Wang, Quan-Jing
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 774
  • [8] Measuring the Dynamic Bi-directional Influence between Content and Social Networks
    Wang, Shenghui
    Groth, Paul
    [J]. SEMANTIC WEB-ISWC 2010, PT I, 2010, 6496 : 814 - 829
  • [9] Bi-directional communication of oligodendrocyte precursors with interneurons determines social cognition
    Bai, X.
    [J]. GLIA, 2023, 71 : E171 - E171
  • [10] Sleep disorders and social engagement in nursing facilities: A bi-directional relationship
    Garms-Homolova, V
    Flick, U.
    Gundula, Roehnsch A. S.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2010, 25 : 36 - 37