Using Monte Carlo Method for estimation of Absorbed Dose in Mammography

被引:0
|
作者
Rezaei, F. Salmani [1 ]
Feghhi, S. A. [1 ]
Aghamiri, S. M. [1 ]
Rezaei, A. Salmani [2 ]
Ebrahimi, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ, Dept Nucl Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran, Dept Elect Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Mammography; Simulation; Monte Carlo Dosimetry; Mean Glandular Dose; Entrance Skin Dose; DOSIMETRY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Mammography is the best method for diagnosis of breast cancer in which the received radiation dose to the patient during imaging increases the risk of cancer. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate irradiation device and estimate the patient dose during mammography. In this study Mean Glandular Dose (MGD) and ESD have been calculated by Monte Carlo method-MCNP4C code. Suitable models for X-ray tube components and patient's breast are considered. In order to simulate Xray spectra, the accelerating electrons were transported until they slow down and stop in the target. To achieve error less than 2% in this work 2x10(8) electrons have been transported and both bremsstrahlung and characteristic X-ray production have been considered and compared with IPEM. Various target/filter combinations and kVps were focused to investigate all device condition effect on the absorbed dose. The breast is simulated as a semi cylinder with 16 cm diameter and 4 cm thickness. After transporting 2x10(8) photons, MGD and ESD have been obtained with error less than 2%. The simulation results show that the relationship between MGD and kVp is linear and the equation is y = 0.127 x -1.544. The results illustrate that for a 4 cm breast MGD is variable between 1.38 and 1.76 mGy in kVp range of 23 to 26. According to simulation, ESD varies from 2.23 to 2.92 mGy for a 4- cm thick breast in kVp range of 23 to 26.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 16
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Monte Carlo estimation of absorbed dose to organs in computed tomography
    Alonso, M
    Barriuso, T
    Castañeda, MJ
    Díaz-Caneja, N
    Gutiérrez, I
    Villar, E
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 2002, 82 (02): : 233 - 239
  • [2] Monte Carlo estimation of absorbed dose to organs in diagnostic radiology
    Alonso, M
    Barriuso, T
    Castañeda, MJ
    Díaz-Caneja, N
    Gutiérrez, I
    Sarmiento, JJ
    Villar, E
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 1999, 76 (04): : 388 - 392
  • [3] The Monte Carlo simulation of the absorbed dose in quartz
    Chen, Shaowen
    Liu, Xiaowei
    Zhang, Chunxiang
    Tang, Qiang
    RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2009, 44 (5-6) : 626 - 628
  • [4] Clinical electron beam characteristics investigations using the Monte Carlo method for absorbed dose determination
    Yoriyaz, H.
    Siqueira, P.
    Poli, M.
    Furnari, L.
    Rubo, R.
    Rodrigues, L.
    Fonseca, G.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (06) : 2424 - 2424
  • [5] Dose estimation of Radiotherapy Based on Monte Carlo Method
    Liu Yanmei
    Xue Dingyu
    Xu Xinhe
    Chen Zhen
    2008 CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-11, 2008, : 4868 - +
  • [6] Estimation of absorbed gamma dose rate from granite by Monte Carlo simulation approach
    Knezevic, J.
    Kuzmanovic, P.
    Mrdja, D.
    Todorovic, N.
    Bikit, I
    Hansman, J.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2020, 40 (02) : 596 - 611
  • [7] Calculation of absorbed dose distribution for Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) using Monte Carlo Method
    Maciak, M.
    Piasecki, P.
    Iller, E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2020, 47 (SUPPL 1) : S239 - S240
  • [8] Estimation of the absorbed dose from electron beams to treat conjunctival lymphoma using a fast Monte Carlo algorithm
    Brualla, L.
    Palanco-Zamora, R.
    Fluehs, A.
    Sauerwein, W.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2009, 185 : 50 - 50
  • [9] MONTE-CARLO CALCULATION OF ABSORBED DOSE IN XEROMAMMOGRAPHY
    DANCE, DR
    BAKER, AM
    DAVIS, R
    STACEY, AJ
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1980, 25 (04): : 760 - 760
  • [10] CALCULATION OF ABSORBED DOSE RATIOS USING CORRELATED MONTE-CARLO SAMPLING
    MA, CM
    NAHUM, AE
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 20 (04) : 1189 - 1199