Increasing a building's life-cycle in regions of high seismic risk

被引:1
|
作者
Sarkisian, M. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Skidmore Owings & Merrill LLP, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1201/9780203885307.ch8
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Beyond life safety considerations, increasing a building's service life is paramount in regions of high seismic risk. With the implementation of scientific structural devices and systems, building services, contents, and economic investments can be protected. Building codes specifying equivalent static analyses in many cases lead to conventional designs including members and joints that have limited ductility and have questionable economic value following a major seismic event. What if structures were designed to behave dynamically moving freely at times, dissipating energy, protecting life safety, protecting investments, and allowing structures to remain elastic after a severe earthquake achieving the highest level of structural sustainability? What if these structures looked directly to nature for their mathematical derivations? What if the solutions to superior performance use conventional building materials? These solutions could provide a scientific response without great expense and construction complexity while increase a building structure's life-cycle in regions of high seismic risk.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 97
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Increasing risk aversion and life-cycle investing
    Kerry Back
    Ruomeng Liu
    Alberto Teguia
    [J]. Mathematics and Financial Economics, 2019, 13 : 287 - 302
  • [2] Increasing risk aversion and life-cycle investing
    Back, Kerry
    Liu, Ruomeng
    Teguia, Alberto
    [J]. MATHEMATICS AND FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 13 (02) : 287 - 302
  • [3] Parameterized seismic life-cycle cost evaluation method for building structures
    Noureldin, Mohamed
    Kim, Jinkoo
    [J]. STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2021, 17 (03) : 425 - 439
  • [4] Life-cycle building control
    East, E. W.
    Bogen, C.
    Rashid, M.
    [J]. EWORK AND EBUSINESS IN ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2012, : 391 - 396
  • [5] A LIFE-CYCLE APPROACH IN BUILDING
    BEKKER, PCF
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 1982, 17 (01) : 55 - 61
  • [6] Life-Cycle Assessment of Seismic Retrofit Strategies Applied to Existing Building Structures
    Vitiello, Umberto
    Salzano, Antonio
    Asprone, Domenico
    Di Ludovico, Marco
    Prota, Andrea
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (12) : 1 - 18
  • [7] Life-cycle cost analysis of bridge structures considering seismic risk
    Furuta, H
    Koyama, K
    Dogaki, M
    Sugimoto, H
    [J]. RELIABILITY AND OPTIMIZATION OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS, 2004, : 39 - 46
  • [8] Modelling the living building life-cycle
    Nederveen, S. V.
    Gielingh, W.
    [J]. EWORK AND EBUSINESS IN ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTIO N, 2009, : 225 - 230
  • [9] Effects of Maintenance Strategies on the Life-cycle Performance and Cost of a Deteriorating RC Building with High-Seismic Hazard
    Chiu, Chien-Kuo
    Noguchi, Takafumi
    Kanematsu, Manabu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 8 (02) : 157 - 170
  • [10] Life-Cycle Evaluation of Passive Building
    Li, Qiangnian
    Zhao, Lijuan
    [J]. ICCREM 2017: INDUSTRY REGULATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2017, : 251 - 259