Uncertainty in importance measures: Developing the epistemic Risk Achievement Worth

被引:0
|
作者
Borgonovo, E. [1 ]
Smith, C. L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Bocconi Univ, Milan, Italy
[2] Idaho Natl Lab, Idaho Falls, ID USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Risk or Reliability Achievement Worth (RAW) is one of the most widely employed importance measures. RAW is defined as the ratio of the reliability (or risk metric) value attained when a component is failed over the base case value of the reliability. Both the numerator and denominator are typically point estimates. In this work, we extend RAW to the case in which epistemic uncertainty is taken into consideration (epistemic RAW; ERAW). ERAW considers the effect of the component being down not only on the reliability point estimate but on its entire epistemic distribution. We discuss the properties of the new measure for series and parallel systems. In particular, for series systems, we show that aleatory uncertainty makes the value of ERAW independent of epistemic uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:2256 / 2260
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Composite multilinearity, epistemic uncertainty and risk achievement worth
    Borgonovo, E.
    Smith, C. L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 222 (02) : 301 - 311
  • [2] On the use of uncertainty importance measures in reliability and risk analysis
    Aven, T.
    Nokland, T. E.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2010, 95 (02) : 127 - 133
  • [3] Extended composite importance measures for multi-state systems with epistemic uncertainty of state assignment
    Xiahou, Tangfan
    Liu, Yu
    Jiang, Tao
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2018, 109 : 305 - 329
  • [4] The Role of Epistemic Uncertainty in Risk Analysis
    Dubois, Didier
    SCALABLE UNCERTAINTY MANAGEMENT, SUM 2010, 2010, 6379 : 11 - 15
  • [5] Uncertainty assessment for availability: Importance measures
    Miman, Mehmet
    Pohl, Edward A.
    2006 PROCEEDINGS - ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2006, : 222 - +
  • [6] On imprecision in relation to uncertainty importance measures
    Flage, R.
    Aven, T.
    Baraldi, P.
    Zio, E.
    ADVANCES IN SAFETY, RELIABILITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2012, : 2250 - 2255
  • [7] Revised regional importance measures in the presence of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties
    Cheng Lei
    Lu ZhenZhou
    Wu DanQing
    SCIENCE CHINA-PHYSICS MECHANICS & ASTRONOMY, 2015, 58 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [8] Revised regional importance measures in the presence of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties
    Lei Cheng
    ZhenZhou Lu
    DanQing Wu
    Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 2015, 58 : 1 - 11
  • [9] Revised regional importance measures in the presence of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties
    CHENG Lei
    LU ZhenZhou
    WU DanQing
    Science China(Physics,Mechanics & Astronomy), 2015, (01) : 90 - 100
  • [10] Extended Component Importance Measures Considering Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainties
    Sallak, Mohamed
    Schoen, Walter
    Aguirre, Felipe
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2013, 62 (01) : 49 - 65