Norwegian Psychomotor Physiotherapy versus Cognitive Patient Education and active physiotherapy-A randomized controlled trial

被引:5
|
作者
Dragesund, Tove [1 ]
Nilsen, Roy Miodini [1 ]
Kvale, Alice [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Norway Univ Appl Sci, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Dept Hlth & Functioning, Bergen, Norway
关键词
musculoskeletal; physiotherapy; RCT; AVOIDANCE BELIEFS QUESTIONNAIRE; BACK PERFORMANCE SCALE; TAMPA SCALE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; CHRONIC PAIN; RELIABILITY; KINESIOPHOBIA; DISABILITY; THERAPY; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1002/pri.1891
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: Norwegian Psychomotor Physiotherapy (NPMP) has been an established treatment approach for more than 50 years, mostly in the Scandinavian countries, usually applied to patients with widespread and long-lasting musculoskeletal pain and/or psychosomatic disorders. Few studies have investigated the outcomes of NPMP, and no randomized clinical trials (RCT) with a comparing treatment group have systematically been tried out on individuals. Methods: This is a pragmatic, single-blinded RCT where 128 participants with long-lasting widespread musculoskeletal pain and/or pain located to the neck and shoulders were block randomized to NPMP or Cognitive Patient Education combined with active individualized physiotherapy (COPE-PT). Intention-to-treat with linear mixed models were used to estimate the group differences in treatment effects. The outcomes at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up were pain intensity, function, anxiety and depression, quality of life, sleep, fear of movement, and subjective health complaints. Risk profile (orebro) was examined at 3 and 6 months. All participants underwent physical tests at baseline and 6 months. Results: One-year data were available for 66.4% of the original participants. Calculated with intention-to-treat analysis, at 3 months statistically significant differences were found in favor of COPE-PT for pain, anxiety and depression, quality of life-physical dimension, risk profile and fear of movement. At 6 months, statistically significant differences in favor of COPE-PT were found for anxiety and depression, and sleep. At 12 months, the improvements were still statistically significant for anxiety, depression and sleep. Both groups improved, but no statistically significant differences were found between the groups on the physical tests at 6 months. Conclusions: COPE-PT, which is targeted towards pain-coping and increasing activity, contribute to more improvements than NPMP.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Study protocol for Norwegian Psychomotor Physiotherapy versus Cognitive Patient Education in combination with active individualized physiotherapy in patients with long-lasting musculoskeletal pain – a randomized controlled trial
    Tove Dragesund
    Alice Kvåle
    [J]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 17
  • [2] Study protocol for Norwegian Psychomotor Physiotherapy versus Cognitive Patient Education in combination with active individualized physiotherapy in patients with long-lasting musculoskeletal pain - a randomized controlled trial
    Dragesund, Tove
    Kvale, Alice
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2016, 17
  • [3] Medial Plica Syndrome of the Knee: Arthroscopic Plica Resection versus Structured Physiotherapy-A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sauer, Steffen
    Karlsen, Gitte
    Miller, Lene
    Storm, Jens Ole
    [J]. SURGERY JOURNAL, 2022, 08 (03): : E249 - E256
  • [4] Physiotherapy Versus Physiotherapy Plus Cognitive Training on Cognition and Quality of Life in Parkinson Disease Randomized Clinical Trial
    Barboza, Natalia Mariano
    Terra, Marcelle Brandao
    Brandao Bueno, Maria Eduarda
    Christofoletti, Gustavo
    Smaili, Suhaila Mahmoud
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2019, 98 (06) : 460 - 468
  • [5] Physiotherapy combined with therapeutic neuroscience education versus physiotherapy alone for patients with chronic low back pain: A pilot, randomized-controlled trial
    Gul, Hatice
    Erel, Suat
    Toraman, Naciye Fusun
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 67 (03): : 283 - 290
  • [6] Physiotherapy and the randomized controlled trial: an evaluation of research and development workshops in musculoskeletal physiotherapy
    Sim, J
    Dziedzic, K
    Hay, EM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 1999, 5 (04) : 437 - 441
  • [7] EFFECT OF SIMULATED PATIENT USE ON LEARNING MOTIVATION AND STUDENT FEEDBACK IN PHYSIOTHERAPY AND REHABILITATION EDUCATION: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Alaca, Nuray
    Safran, Elif Esma
    Cagri, Dilek
    Feyzioglu, Ozlem
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY REHABILITATION-TURK FIZYOTERAPI VE REHABILITASYON DERGISI, 2020, 31 (03): : 307 - 315
  • [8] RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY FOR POSTOPERATIVE PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS
    MORRAN, CG
    FINLAY, IG
    MATHIESON, M
    MCKAY, AJ
    WILSON, N
    MCARDLE, CS
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1983, 55 (11) : 1113 - 1117
  • [9] A randomized controlled trial of respiratory physiotherapy for patients with LRTI
    Marques, Alda Sofia Pires de Dias
    Oliveira, Ana
    Ayoub, Rodrigo
    Neves, Joana
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2016, 48
  • [10] Effectiveness of aquatic versus land physiotherapy in the treatment of peripheral neuropathies: a randomized controlled trial
    Zivi, Ilaria
    Maffia, Sara
    Ferrari, Vanessa
    Zarucchi, Alessio
    Molatore, Katia
    Maestri, Roberto
    Frazzitta, Giuseppe
    [J]. CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2018, 32 (05) : 663 - 670