Defining the ecological values of rivers: the views of Australian river scientists and managers

被引:16
|
作者
Dunn, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Sch Geog & Environm Studies, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
关键词
river conservation; identification; conservation criteria; opinion survey;
D O I
10.1002/aqc.618
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
1. The first step in making a case for river conservation is to define the particular values and attributes that describe conservation significance. 2. Australia's rivers vary widely in their characteristics and ecological communities. The conservation values of Australian rivers have not been well articulated. 3. A survey of Australian river scientists and managers was undertaken to identify the criteria and attributes of rivers of high ecological value. This was the first attempt to establish a baseline for defining natural conservation values for Australian rivers. 4. The final list comprised five broad criteria with a total of 47 attributes considered to be indicators of high ecological value. These included not only biotic values, but also values attributed to river hydrology, geomorphology, instream processes, and landscape functions. 5. The list of criteria and attributes provides a context from which specific values may be drawn to assess conservation values of rivers for particular purposes. Copyright (C) 2004 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 433
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Connecting ecological science and management in forests for scientists, managers and pocket scientists
    Binkley, Dan
    Adams, Mark
    Fredericksen, Todd
    Laclau, Jean Paul
    Makinen, Harri
    Prescott, Cindy
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 410 : 157 - 163
  • [2] Restoring ecological integrity of great rivers: historical hydrographs aid in defining reference conditions for the Missouri River
    Galat, DL
    Lipkin, R
    [J]. HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2000, 422 (0) : 29 - 48
  • [3] Restoring ecological integrity of great rivers: historical hydrographs aid in defining reference conditions for the Missouri River
    David L. Galat
    Robin Lipkin
    [J]. Hydrobiologia, 2000, 422-423 : 29 - 48
  • [4] Sediment management of the Himalayan rivers: a challenge for river managers
    Sinha, Rajiv
    [J]. CURRENT SCIENCE, 2018, 115 (03): : 367 - 368
  • [5] Values in environmental research: Citizens' views of scientists who acknowledge values
    Elliott, Kevin C.
    McCright, Aaron M.
    Allen, Summer
    Dietz, Thomas
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (10):
  • [6] Ecosystem services in European protected areas: Ambiguity in the views of scientists and managers?
    Hummel, Christiaan
    Provenzale, Antonello
    van der Meer, Jaap
    Wijnhoven, Sander
    Nolte, Arno
    Poursanidis, Dimitris
    Janss, Guyonne
    Jurek, Matthias
    Andresen, Magnus
    Poulin, Brigitte
    Kobler, Johannes
    Beierkuhnlein, Carl
    Honrado, Joao
    Razinkovas, Arturas
    Stritih, Ana
    Bargmann, Tessa
    Ziemba, Alex
    Bonet-Garcia, Francisco
    Adamescu, Mihai Cristian
    Janssen, Gerard
    Hummel, Herman
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (11):
  • [7] Ecological impacts of invasive carp in Australian dryland rivers
    Marshall, Jonathan C.
    Blessing, Joanna J.
    Clifford, Sara E.
    Hodges, Kate M.
    Negus, Peter M.
    Steward, Alisha L.
    [J]. AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2019, 29 (11) : 1870 - 1889
  • [8] Ecological values of intermittent rivers for terrestrial vertebrate fauna
    Mar Sanchez-Montoya, Maria
    Gomez, Rosa
    Calvo, Jose F.
    Bartonicka, Tomas
    Datry, Thibault
    Paril, Petr
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 806
  • [9] THE NATURE AND ORIGINS OF ECOLOGICAL WORLD VIEWS - AN AUSTRALIAN STUDY
    BLAIKIE, NWH
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1992, 73 (01) : 144 - 165
  • [10] The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act at 50: Managers' views of actions, barriers and partnerships
    Paveglio, Travis B.
    McGown, Brenna
    Wilson, Patrick I.
    Krumpe, Edwin E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OUTDOOR RECREATION AND TOURISM-RESEARCH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 37