Specific energy consumption and carbon intensity of ceramic tablewares: Small enterprises (SEs) in Thailand

被引:14
|
作者
Chuenwong, Iannaphat [1 ,2 ]
Chiarakorn, Siriluk [3 ]
Sajjakulnukit, Boonrod [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] King Mongkuts Univ Technol Thonburi, Joint Grad Sch Energy & Environm, Environm Technol Div, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
[2] PERDO, Ctr Excellence Energy Technol & Environm, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] King Mongkuts Univ Technol Thonburi, Sch Energy Environm & Mat, Environm Technol Div, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
[4] King Mongkuts Univ Technol Thonburi, Joint Grad Sch Energy & Environm, Div Energy Technol, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
关键词
Ceramic tableware; Specific energy consumption; Carbon intensity; Small enterprises; Thailand; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.089
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission from ceramic tableware production in Thailand were evaluated. Activity data regarding ceramic tableware manufacture were collected from 13 small-scale ceramic tableware plants within the boundaries of gate-to-gate. The functional unit of analysis was 1 kg of ceramic tableware product. The GHG emission of ceramic tableware production per unit of kgCO(2)e/kg was calculated following the 2006 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) guidelines. Emission factors were taken from the Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization (TGO) and IPCC databases. The SPSS independent sample t-test (IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0) was used as a statistical inferential method for comparison of energy consumption. Results showed that the energy consumptions of ceramic tableware were mainly from liquefied petroleum gases (LPG) as 19,363 ME tonne during the firing process (99%), followed by electricity at 243 MJ/tonne (1%) during the forming process. The average specific energy consumption (SEC) for small-scale ceramic tableware production in Thailand was 19.6 4.7 GJ/tonne of product. The SPSS independent sample t-test revealed that the energy consumption in double firing plants was 10% significantly higher than single firing plants. Comparison between specific LPG consumptions and kiln loading capacities of single filing plants indicated a linear relationship, and kiln loading capacity significantly influenced the amount of specific LPG consumed. An increase in kiln loading capacity decreased specific LPG consumption. Every one kg product/m(3) loading increase gave a reduction of 0.67 kg LPG/kg product. The average carbon intensity of small-scale ceramic tableware production in Thailand was 1.241 +/- 0.295 kgCO(2)e/kg of product. The largest GHG emission was from LPG consumption-during the firing process (98%), followed by electricity consumptions (1%), and decomposition of calcium and barium carbonates (1%). The average GHG emissions of double fired and single fired products were 1.340 and 1.211 kgCO(2)e/kg of product, respectively. Therefore, LPG consumption during the firing process was identified as the main hotspot for energy consumption and GHG emission. Increasing kiln loading capacity, reducing kiln heat leakage, and repairing ceramic insulators were recommended as good practices for energy saving which can potentially be applied to the existing small-scale ceramic tableware plants. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 405
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Nexus among energy consumption structure, energy intensity, population density, urbanization, and carbon intensity: a heterogeneous panel evidence considering differences in electrification rates
    Jingqi Sun
    Xiaohui Guo
    Yuan Wang
    Jing Shi
    Yiquan Zhou
    Boyang Shen
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 19224 - 19243
  • [42] Thermal energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions in ceramic tile manufacture - Analysis of the Spanish and Brazilian industries
    Monfort, E.
    Mezquita, A.
    Vaquer, E.
    Mallol, G.
    Alves, H. J.
    Boschi, A. O.
    BOLETIN DE LA SOCIEDAD ESPANOLA DE CERAMICA Y VIDRIO, 2012, 51 (05): : 275 - 284
  • [43] Can new-type urbanization construction policy mitigate energy consumption intensity? Evidence from Chinese listed enterprises
    Ju, Cheng
    Yuan, Can
    Yan, Jiale
    Isik, Cem
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [44] Universal Energy Ratings for Germany - Part 4: Specific heating-energy consumption of small houses and consumption projection for the total housing stock
    Schroeder, Franz
    Altendorf, Lars
    Greller, Martin
    Boegelein, Tobias
    BAUPHYSIK, 2011, 33 (04) : 243 - 253
  • [45] Carbon Dioxide Reduction by Saving Energy Consumption in Small Scale Industries - A Case Study
    Ganesan, S.
    Birundha, V. Dhulasi
    Bose, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY & DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 18 (01) : 76 - 90
  • [46] Spatial-temporal pattern and spatial convergence of carbon emission intensity of rural energy consumption in China
    Xia, Wenhao
    Ma, Yiguang
    Gao, Yajing
    Huo, Yu
    Su, Xufeng
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2024, 31 (05) : 7751 - 7774
  • [47] Study of the impact of energy consumption structure on carbon emission intensity in China from the perspective of spatial effects
    Hongwei Xiao
    Zhongyu Ma
    Peng Zhang
    Ming Liu
    Natural Hazards, 2019, 99 : 1365 - 1380
  • [48] Study of the impact of energy consumption structure on carbon emission intensity in China from the perspective of spatial effects
    Xiao, Hongwei
    Ma, Zhongyu
    Zhang, Peng
    Liu, Ming
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2019, 99 (03) : 1365 - 1380
  • [49] Spatial-temporal pattern and spatial convergence of carbon emission intensity of rural energy consumption in China
    Wenhao Xia
    Yiguang Ma
    Yajing Gao
    Yu Huo
    Xufeng Su
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 : 7751 - 7774
  • [50] Energy efficiency in electrical systems of micro, small and medium size enterprises of the food sector. Simulation to optimize electric energy consumption costs
    Cuisano J.C.
    Chirinos L.R.
    Barrantes E.J.
    Mas R.E.
    Informacion Tecnologica, 2020, 31 (02): : 267 - 276